Robinson B F
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Jan 25;55(3):102B-106B. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90618-6.
Calcium-entry blocking agents resemble established dilators such as diazoxide, minoxidil and hydralazine in that they act predominantly on the arterial resistance vessels and have little or no effect upon the veins. They have therefore been evaluated in the treatment of hypertension. Controlled studies have shown that verapamil and nifedipine are effective in decreasing blood pressure when given as sole agents. The antihypertensive effect of nifedipine is additive with that of a beta blocker, and nifedipine is also effective when given as a "third step" agent in combination with a beta blocker (or alpha methyldopa) and a diuretic. In contrast to other directly acting dilators, nifedipine causes, at most, only moderate stimulation of renin secretion and verapamil does not increase renin release at all; neither drug induces sodium retention. Both verapamil and nifedipine produce a moderate incidence of unwanted effects; these are mostly subjective in nature, but verapamil may cause constipation that is occasionally severe and nifedipine sometimes causes ankle swelling. Calcium-entry blockers should be considered as initial therapy when some contraindication exists to the use of other standard drugs. Nifedipine appears preferable to hydralazine for use in combination with a beta blocker and a diuretic: it is at least as effective as hydralazine and has a lower incidence of serious adverse effects.
钙通道阻滞剂与已有的血管扩张剂如二氮嗪、米诺地尔和肼屈嗪相似,因为它们主要作用于动脉阻力血管,对静脉几乎没有影响。因此,它们已被用于高血压治疗的评估。对照研究表明,维拉帕米和硝苯地平单独使用时可有效降低血压。硝苯地平的降压作用与β受体阻滞剂的作用相加,并且硝苯地平与β受体阻滞剂(或甲基多巴)和利尿剂联合作为“第三步”药物使用时也有效。与其他直接作用的血管扩张剂不同,硝苯地平最多只会引起适度的肾素分泌刺激,而维拉帕米根本不会增加肾素释放;两种药物都不会引起钠潴留。维拉帕米和硝苯地平产生不良反应的发生率适中;这些不良反应大多是主观性质的,但维拉帕米可能会导致便秘,偶尔会很严重,硝苯地平有时会导致脚踝肿胀。当使用其他标准药物存在某些禁忌症时,应考虑将钙通道阻滞剂作为初始治疗药物。硝苯地平与β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂联合使用似乎比肼屈嗪更可取:它至少与肼屈嗪一样有效,并且严重不良反应的发生率更低。