Suppr超能文献

家族病史与乳腺癌风险:一项考虑家族结构的分析

Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure.

作者信息

Brewer Hannah R, Jones Michael E, Schoemaker Minouk J, Ashworth Alan, Swerdlow Anthony J

机构信息

Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.

Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sir Richard Doll Building, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Family history is an important risk factor for breast cancer incidence, but the parameters conventionally used to categorize it are based solely on numbers and/or ages of breast cancer cases in the family and take no account of the size and age-structure of the woman's family.

METHODS

Using data from the Generations Study, a cohort of over 113,000 women from the general UK population, we analyzed breast cancer risk in relation to first-degree family history using a family history score (FHS) that takes account of the expected number of family cases based on the family's age-structure and national cancer incidence rates.

RESULTS

Breast cancer risk increased significantly (P  < 0.0001) with greater FHS. There was a 3.5-fold (95% CI 2.56-4.79) range of risk between the lowest and highest FHS groups, whereas women who had two or more relatives with breast cancer, the strongest conventional familial risk factor, had a 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.83-3.47) increase in risk. Using likelihood ratio tests, the best model for determining breast cancer risk due to family history was that combining FHS and age of relative at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A family history score based on expected as well as observed breast cancers in a family can give greater risk discrimination on breast cancer incidence than conventional parameters based solely on cases in affected relatives. Our modeling suggests that a yet stronger predictor of risk might be a combination of this score and age at diagnosis in relatives.

摘要

目的

家族史是乳腺癌发病的重要风险因素,但传统上用于对其进行分类的参数仅基于家族中乳腺癌病例的数量和/或年龄,而未考虑女性家族的规模和年龄结构。

方法

利用来自世代研究的数据,该研究对超过113,000名来自英国普通人群的女性进行了队列研究,我们使用家族史评分(FHS)分析了与一级家族史相关的乳腺癌风险,该评分考虑了基于家族年龄结构和国家癌症发病率的家族病例预期数量。

结果

乳腺癌风险随着FHS的增加而显著增加(P < 0.0001)。最低和最高FHS组之间的风险范围为3.5倍(95%CI 2.56 - 4.79),而有两个或更多患乳腺癌亲属的女性,这是最强的传统家族风险因素,其风险增加了2.5倍(95%CI 1.83 - 3.47)。使用似然比检验,确定家族史导致乳腺癌风险的最佳模型是将FHS和亲属诊断时的年龄相结合。

结论

基于家族中预期和观察到的乳腺癌的家族史评分,比仅基于受影响亲属病例的传统参数在乳腺癌发病率风险判别方面能提供更大的区分度。我们的模型表明,更强的风险预测指标可能是该评分与亲属诊断年龄的组合。

相似文献

1
Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
5
Timing of familial breast cancer in sisters.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):721-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn146. Epub 2008 May 13.
6
Risk factors for breast cancer in elderly women.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Nov 1;160(9):868-75. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh276.
10
Prospective study of breast cancer risk for mutation negative women from BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation positive families.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Dec;130(3):1057-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1733-6. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Current trends in breast cancer genetics, risk factors, and screening strategies.
J Biol Methods. 2025 Mar 13;12(2):e99010054. doi: 10.14440/jbm.2025.0079. eCollection 2025.
2
Recent strategies in diagnosis, screening, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer in young women.
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 11;16(1):1532. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03180-0.
3
Optimizing breast cancer screening strategies for women with different BMI levels in Ghana: A simulation-based study on BMI-dependent tumor growth model.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 28;5(7):e0004953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004953. eCollection 2025.
4
PI3 K/AKT/mTOR pathway and its role in breast cancer stem cells.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04297-3.
6
Myths and Misconceptions of Breast Cancer Causation among Female Population of Saudi Arabia.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Jun 1;26(6):2155-2162. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.6.2155.

本文引用的文献

2
Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 30;107(12):djv263. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv263. Print 2015 Dec.
3
Established breast cancer risk factors and risk of intrinsic tumor subtypes.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Aug;1856(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
4
Global cancer statistics, 2012.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
5
Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited.
Mol Oncol. 2013 Oct;7(5):859-69. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Family history and risk of breast cancer: nurses' health study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jun;133(3):1097-104. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-1985-9. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
7
The Breakthrough Generations Study: design of a long-term UK cohort study to investigate breast cancer aetiology.
Br J Cancer. 2011 Sep 27;105(7):911-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.337. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
8
Confirmation of family cancer history reported in a population-based survey.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 May 18;103(10):788-97. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr114. Epub 2011 May 11.
9
Family cancer history: healthy skepticism required.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 May 18;103(10):776-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr142. Epub 2011 May 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验