Graham James E, Prvu Bettger Janet, Middleton Addie, Spratt Heidi, Sharma Gulshan, Ottenbacher Kenneth J
Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke Medicine, Durham, NC.
Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;52(5):1631-1646. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12678. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
To examine the effects of facility-level acute-postacute continuity on probability of community discharge and 30-day rehospitalization following inpatient rehabilitation.
We used national Medicare enrollment, claims, and assessment data to study 541,097 patients discharged from 1,156 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2010-2011.
We calculated facility-level continuity as the percentages of an IRF's patients admitted from each contributing acute care hospital. Patients were categorized into three groups: low continuity (<26 percent from same hospital that discharged the patient), medium continuity (26-75 percent from same hospital), or high continuity (>75 percent from same hospital). The multivariable models included an interaction term to examine the potential moderating effects of facility type (freestanding facility vs. hospital-based rehabilitation unit) on the relationships between facility-level continuity and our two outcomes: community discharge and 30-day rehospitalization.
Medicare beneficiaries in hospital-based rehabilitation units were more likely to be referred from a high-contributing hospital compared to those in freestanding facilities. However, the association between higher acute-postacute continuity and desirable outcomes is significantly better in freestanding rehabilitation facilities than in hospital-based units.
Improving continuity is a key premise of health care reform. We found that both observed referral patterns and continuity-related benefits differed markedly by facility type. These findings provide a starting point for health systems establishing or strengthening acute-postacute relationships to improve patient outcomes in this new era of shared accountability and public quality reporting programs.
研究机构层面急性-亚急性连续性对住院康复后社区出院概率及30天再住院率的影响。
我们使用全国医疗保险参保、理赔及评估数据,对2010 - 2011年从1156家住院康复机构(IRF)出院的541,097名患者进行研究。
我们将机构层面的连续性计算为每个IRF中来自各急性护理医院的入院患者百分比。患者被分为三组:低连续性(来自出院医院的比例<26%)、中等连续性(来自出院医院的比例为26% - 75%)或高连续性(来自出院医院的比例>75%)。多变量模型包含一个交互项,以检验机构类型(独立机构与医院附属康复单元)对机构层面连续性与我们的两个结果(社区出院和30天再住院率)之间关系的潜在调节作用。
与独立机构中的医疗保险受益人相比,医院附属康复单元中的受益人更有可能来自贡献度高的医院。然而,在独立康复机构中,更高的急性-亚急性连续性与理想结果之间的关联明显优于医院附属单元。
改善连续性是医疗改革的关键前提。我们发现,观察到的转诊模式和与连续性相关的益处因机构类型而异。这些发现为卫生系统建立或加强急性-亚急性关系以在这个共同问责和公共质量报告计划的新时代改善患者结局提供了一个起点。