Rawstorn Jonathan C, Gant Nicholas, Warren Ian, Doughty Robert Neil, Lever Nigel, Poppe Katrina K, Maddison Ralph
National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Mar 20;2(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/rehab.3633.
Remote telemonitoring holds great potential to augment management of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) by enabling regular physiological monitoring during physical activity. Remote physiological monitoring may improve home and community exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (exCR) programs and could improve assessment of the impact and management of pharmacological interventions for heart rate control in individuals with AF.
Our aim was to evaluate the measurement validity and data transmission reliability of a remote telemonitoring system comprising a wireless multi-parameter physiological sensor, custom mobile app, and middleware platform, among individuals in sinus rhythm and AF.
Participants in sinus rhythm and with AF undertook simulated daily activities, low, moderate, and/or high intensity exercise. Remote monitoring system heart rate and respiratory rate were compared to reference measures (12-lead ECG and indirect calorimeter). Wireless data transmission loss was calculated between the sensor, mobile app, and remote Internet server.
Median heart rate (-0.30 to 1.10 b∙min) and respiratory rate (-1.25 to 0.39 br∙min) measurement biases were small, yet statistically significant (all P≤.003) due to the large number of observations. Measurement reliability was generally excellent (rho=.87-.97, all P<.001; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.94-.98, all P<.001; coefficient of variation [CV]=2.24-7.94%), although respiratory rate measurement reliability was poor among AF participants (rho=.43, P<.001; ICC=.55, P<.001; CV=16.61%). Data loss was minimal (<5%) when all system components were active; however, instability of the network hosting the remote data capture server resulted in data loss at the remote Internet server during some trials.
System validity was sufficient for remote monitoring of heart and respiratory rates across a range of exercise intensities. Remote exercise monitoring has potential to augment current exCR and heart rate control management approaches by enabling the provision of individually tailored care to individuals outside traditional clinical environments.
远程遥测监测通过在身体活动期间进行定期生理监测,在增强冠心病(CHD)和心房颤动(AF)患者的管理方面具有巨大潜力。远程生理监测可能会改善基于家庭和社区的运动心脏康复(exCR)计划,并可能改善对AF患者心率控制的药物干预的影响评估和管理。
我们的目的是评估由无线多参数生理传感器、定制移动应用程序和中间件平台组成的远程遥测监测系统在窦性心律和AF个体中的测量有效性和数据传输可靠性。
窦性心律和AF参与者进行模拟日常活动、低、中、和/或高强度运动。将远程监测系统的心率和呼吸率与参考测量值(12导联心电图和间接热量计)进行比较。计算传感器、移动应用程序和远程互联网服务器之间的无线数据传输损失。
由于观察数量众多,心率中位数(-0.30至1.10次/分钟)和呼吸率中位数(-1.25至0.39次/分钟)测量偏差较小,但具有统计学意义(所有P≤.003)。测量可靠性总体上非常好(rho =.87-.97,所有P<.001;组内相关系数[ICC]=.94-.98,所有P<.001;变异系数[CV]=2.24-7.94%),尽管AF参与者的呼吸率测量可靠性较差(rho =.43,P<.001;ICC =.55,P<.001;CV =16.61%)。当所有系统组件都处于活动状态时,数据丢失最小(<5%);然而,托管远程数据捕获服务器的网络不稳定导致在某些试验期间远程互联网服务器出现数据丢失。
该系统的有效性足以在一系列运动强度下远程监测心率和呼吸率。远程运动监测有潜力通过为传统临床环境之外的个体提供个性化定制护理来增强当前的exCR和心率控制管理方法。