From the George Institute for Global Health (T.O., M.W., M.J., J.H., J.C.), and Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, Sydney Medical School (S.C.), University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (M.W.); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (M.W.); Departments of Epidemiology (P.M.) and Medicine (P.M.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Physiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.H.); University of Milan-Bicocca and Instituto Auxologico Italiano (G.M.); International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College, London, UK (N.P.); Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London (UCL) and National Institute of Health Research UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (B.W.); and Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (P.R.).
Hypertension. 2017 Aug;70(2):461-468. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09359. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, whether it provides additional predictive information beyond traditional risk factors, including mean SBP, in the long term is unclear. The ADVANCE trial (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation) was a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus; ADVANCE-ON (ADVANCE-Observational) followed-up patients subsequently. In these analyses, 9114 patients without major macrovascular or renal events or death during the first 24 months were included. Data on SBP from 6 visits during the first 24 months after randomization were used to estimate visit-to-visit variability in several ways: the primary measure was the standard deviation. Events accrued during the following 7.6 years. The primary outcome was a composite of major macrovascular and renal events and all-cause mortality. Standard deviation of SBP was log-linearly associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (<0.001) after adjustment for mean SBP and other cardiovascular risk factors. The hazard ratio (HR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) in the highest, compared with the lowest, tenth of the standard deviation was 1.39 (1.15-1.69). Results were similar for major macrovascular events alone and all-cause mortality alone (both <0.01). Addition of standard deviation of SBP significantly improved 8-year risk classification (continuous net reclassification improvement, 5.3%). Results were similar for other measures of visit-to-visit variability, except maximum SBP. Visit-to-visit variability in SBP is an independent predictor of vascular complications and death, which improves risk prediction beyond that provided by traditional risk factors, including mean SBP.
血压变异性与心血管事件风险相关。然而,其是否能提供比传统风险因素(包括平均 SBP)更长期的额外预测信息尚不清楚。ADVANCE 试验(糖尿病和血管疾病的行动:培哚普利和二甲双胍缓释片的控制评估)是一项 2 型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验;ADVANCE-ON(ADVANCE 的观察)随后对患者进行了随访。在这些分析中,纳入了 9114 名在最初 24 个月内无重大大血管或肾脏事件或死亡的患者。使用随机分组后最初 24 个月内的 6 次就诊的 SBP 数据,采用多种方法评估血压变异性:主要指标是标准差。在随后的 7.6 年内累计发生事件。主要结局是主要大血管和肾脏事件以及全因死亡率的复合结局。在调整平均 SBP 和其他心血管风险因素后,SBP 标准差与主要结局风险增加呈对数线性相关(<0.001)。与最低十分位数相比,最高十分位数的危险比(HR;95%置信区间 [CI])为 1.39(1.15-1.69)。主要大血管事件和全因死亡率的结果均相似(均 <0.01)。SBP 标准差的加入显著改善了 8 年风险分类(连续净重新分类改善 5.3%)。其他血压变异性指标的结果相似,除了最大 SBP。SBP 的血压变异性是血管并发症和死亡的独立预测因素,可改善风险预测,其作用超过了传统风险因素(包括平均 SBP)。