Suppr超能文献

药物诱导睡眠内镜检查中的观察者变异:有经验与无经验的耳鼻喉科外科医生。

Observer variation in drug-induced sleep endoscopy: experienced versus nonexperienced ear, nose, and throat surgeons.

机构信息

ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Sleep. 2013 Jun 1;36(6):947-53. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2732.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine variations in interobserver and intraobserver agreement of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in a cohort of experienced versus nonexperienced ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons.

DESIGN

Prospective, blinded agreement study.

SETTING

Ninety-seven ENT surgeons (90 nonexperienced with DISE; seven experienced) observed six different DISE videos and were asked to score the upper airway (UA) level (palate, oropharynx, tongue base, hypopharynx, epiglottis), direction (anteroposterior, concentric, lateral), and degree of collapse (none; partial or complete collapse). Findings were collected and analyzed, determining interobserver and intraobserver agreement [overall agreement (OA), specific agreement (SA)] and kappa values per UA level.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

In the nonexperienced group, overall interobserver agreement on presence of tongue base collapse (OA = 0.63; kappa = 0.33) was followed by the agreement on epiglottis (OA = 0.57; kappa = 0.23) and oropharynx collapse (OA = 0.45; kappa = 0.09). Low overall interobserver agreement in this group was found for hypopharyngeal collapse (OA = 0.33; kappa = 0.08). A similar ranking was found for degree of collapse. For direction of collapse, high interobserver agreement was found for the palate (OA = 0.57; kappa = 0.16). Among the experienced observers, overall interobserver agreement was highest for presence of tongue base collapse (OA = 0.93; kappa = 0.71), followed by collapse of the palate (OA = 0.80; kappa = 0.51). In this group, lowest agreement was also found for hypopharyngeal collapse (OA = 0.47; kappa = 0.03). Interob-server agreement on direction of collapse was highest for epiglottis collapse (OA = 0.97; kappa = 0.97). Concerning the degree of collapse, highest agreement was found for degree of oropharyngeal collapse (OA = 0.82; kappa = 0.66). Among the experienced observers a statistically significant higher interobserver agreement was obtained for presence, direction, and degree of oropharyngeal collapse, as well as for presence of tongue base collapse and degree of epiglottis collapse. Among the nonexperienced observers, high intraobserver agreement was found in particular for tongue base and epiglottis collapse. Among the experienced observers, high agreement was found for all levels but to a lesser extent for hypopharyngeal collapse. Intraobserver agreement was statistically significantly higher in the experienced group, for all UA levels expect for the hypopharynx.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that both interobserver and intraobserver agreement was higher in experienced versus nonexperienced ENT surgeons. Agreement ranged from poor to excellent in both groups. The current results suggest that experience in performing DISE is necessary to obtain reliable observations.

摘要

研究目的

确定在经验丰富与非经验丰富的耳鼻喉科(ENT)外科医生中,药物诱导睡眠内镜(DISE)的观察者间和观察者内一致性的差异。

设计

前瞻性、盲法一致性研究。

设置

97 名耳鼻喉科外科医生(90 名无 DISE 经验;7 名有经验)观察了 6 个不同的 DISE 视频,并被要求对上气道(UA)水平(硬腭、口咽、舌根、下咽、会厌)、方向(前后、同心、侧向)和塌陷程度(无;部分或完全塌陷)进行评分。收集和分析结果,确定观察者间和观察者内的一致性(总体一致性(OA)、特定一致性(SA))和每个 UA 水平的kappa 值。

测量和结果

在无经验组中,舌根塌陷存在的观察者间总体一致性最高(OA=0.63;kappa=0.33),其次是会厌(OA=0.57;kappa=0.23)和口咽塌陷(OA=0.45;kappa=0.09)。在该组中,下咽部塌陷的观察者间总体一致性较低(OA=0.33;kappa=0.08)。对于塌陷程度,也发现了类似的排名。对于塌陷方向,硬腭的观察者间一致性较高(OA=0.57;kappa=0.16)。在有经验的观察者中,舌根塌陷存在的观察者间总体一致性最高(OA=0.93;kappa=0.71),其次是硬腭塌陷(OA=0.80;kappa=0.51)。在该组中,下咽部塌陷的一致性最低(OA=0.47;kappa=0.03)。对于会厌塌陷,观察者间的一致性最高(OA=0.97;kappa=0.97)。对于塌陷方向,观察者间的一致性最高的是会厌塌陷。至于塌陷程度,口咽塌陷的一致性最高(OA=0.82;kappa=0.66)。在有经验的观察者中,对于口咽塌陷的存在、方向和程度,以及舌根塌陷和会厌塌陷的程度,均获得了统计学上显著更高的观察者间一致性。在无经验的观察者中,舌根和会厌塌陷的观察者内一致性特别高。在有经验的观察者中,所有水平的一致性都很高,但下咽部的一致性较低。在有经验的观察者中,除了下咽,所有 UA 水平的观察者内一致性均显著更高。

结论

本研究表明,经验丰富的 ENT 外科医生的观察者间和观察者内一致性均高于无经验的外科医生。在两组中,一致性从差到好不等。目前的结果表明,进行 DISE 操作的经验对于获得可靠的观察结果是必要的。

相似文献

5
Is image interpretation in drug-induced sleep endoscopy that reliable?药物诱导睡眠内镜检查中的图像解读可靠吗?
Sleep Breath. 2020 Jun;24(2):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01958-5. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: the VOTE classification.药物诱导睡眠内镜检查:VOTE 分类。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug;268(8):1233-1236. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1633-8. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Interrater reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy.药物诱导睡眠内镜检查的评分者间可靠性。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;136(4):393-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.26.
9
Test-retest reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy.药物诱导睡眠内镜检查的重测信度
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 May;140(5):646-51. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验