Leonard Laurence B, Deevy Patricia
Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):1030-1041. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0095.
The purpose of this article is to present 3 approaches that emphasize the role that input plays in the treatment of grammatical deficits in children with language impairments.
These approaches-input informativeness, competing sources of input, and high variability-were selected because they go beyond issues of token frequency and emphasize instead type frequency, relative frequency, and frequency at an abstract as well as a concrete level of grammar. Each of these approaches can be applied to the grammatical deficits seen in children with specific language impairment and can be readily used with well-established procedures, such as focused stimulation and recasting.
Each approach is supported by a body of laboratory research with children with typical language skills, and the feasibility of each has been tested in studies with a treatment design. Furthermore, the assumptions of the 3 approaches are largely compatible, permitting application of combinations of these approaches without violating any of their principles.
The positive findings from each of these approaches should serve as a basis for further clinical research.
本文旨在介绍三种方法,这些方法强调输入在语言障碍儿童语法缺陷治疗中所起的作用。
选择这些方法——输入信息性、输入的竞争来源和高变异性——是因为它们超越了词频问题,而是强调类型频率、相对频率以及语法抽象和具体层面的频率。这些方法中的每一种都可以应用于特定语言障碍儿童出现的语法缺陷,并且可以很容易地与既定程序(如集中刺激和重新表述)一起使用。
每种方法都得到了一系列针对具有典型语言技能儿童的实验室研究的支持,并且每种方法的可行性都在具有治疗设计的研究中得到了检验。此外,这三种方法的假设在很大程度上是兼容的,允许在不违反其任何原则的情况下应用这些方法的组合。
这些方法各自的积极研究结果应作为进一步临床研究的基础。