Suppr超能文献

对语法缺陷儿童治疗中输入的不断变化的看法。

The Changing View of Input in the Treatment of Children With Grammatical Deficits.

作者信息

Leonard Laurence B, Deevy Patricia

机构信息

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):1030-1041. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0095.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to present 3 approaches that emphasize the role that input plays in the treatment of grammatical deficits in children with language impairments.

METHOD

These approaches-input informativeness, competing sources of input, and high variability-were selected because they go beyond issues of token frequency and emphasize instead type frequency, relative frequency, and frequency at an abstract as well as a concrete level of grammar. Each of these approaches can be applied to the grammatical deficits seen in children with specific language impairment and can be readily used with well-established procedures, such as focused stimulation and recasting.

RESULTS

Each approach is supported by a body of laboratory research with children with typical language skills, and the feasibility of each has been tested in studies with a treatment design. Furthermore, the assumptions of the 3 approaches are largely compatible, permitting application of combinations of these approaches without violating any of their principles.

CONCLUSION

The positive findings from each of these approaches should serve as a basis for further clinical research.

摘要

目的

本文旨在介绍三种方法,这些方法强调输入在语言障碍儿童语法缺陷治疗中所起的作用。

方法

选择这些方法——输入信息性、输入的竞争来源和高变异性——是因为它们超越了词频问题,而是强调类型频率、相对频率以及语法抽象和具体层面的频率。这些方法中的每一种都可以应用于特定语言障碍儿童出现的语法缺陷,并且可以很容易地与既定程序(如集中刺激和重新表述)一起使用。

结果

每种方法都得到了一系列针对具有典型语言技能儿童的实验室研究的支持,并且每种方法的可行性都在具有治疗设计的研究中得到了检验。此外,这三种方法的假设在很大程度上是兼容的,允许在不违反其任何原则的情况下应用这些方法的组合。

结论

这些方法各自的积极研究结果应作为进一步临床研究的基础。

相似文献

1
The Changing View of Input in the Treatment of Children With Grammatical Deficits.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):1030-1041. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0095.
6
Feasibility of a Recasting and Auditory Bombardment Treatment With Young Cochlear Implant Users.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2016 Apr 1;47(2):157-70. doi: 10.1044/2016_LSHSS-15-0060.
7
Children's views of communication and speech-language pathology.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;13(4):281-90. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.577809.
8
Current Practice of Child Grammar Intervention: A Survey of Speech-Language Pathologists.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1329-1351. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0168.
9
Grammar predicts procedural learning and consolidation deficits in children with Specific Language Impairment.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2362-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.026. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
10
Initial mean length of utterance predicts the relative efficacy of two grammatical treatments in preschoolers with specific language impairment.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Aug;54(4):1170-81. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0246). Epub 2011 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Data-Informed Guideposts for Decision Making in Enhanced Conversational Recast Treatment.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Nov 12;29(4):2068-2081. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00017. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Telegraphic Versus Grammatical Utterances: A Survey Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2271-2280. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00132. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Treatment Targets for Co-Occurring Speech-Language Impairment: A Case Study.
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2019 Apr 15;4(2):240-256. doi: 10.1044/2019_PERS-SIG1-2018-0013. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Individual Versus Small Group Treatment of Morphological Errors for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Apr 23;50(2):237-252. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0033.
5
Learning Without Trying: The Clinical Relevance of Statistical Learning.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Aug 14;49(3S):710-722. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0131.
6
Distributional Cues to Language Learning in Children With Intellectual Disabilities.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Aug 14;49(3S):653-667. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0128.

本文引用的文献

1
Input Subject Diversity Enhances Early Grammatical Growth: Evidence from a Parent-Implemented Intervention.
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(1):54-79. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1193020. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Sensitivity to Morphosyntactic Information in 3-Year-Old Children With Typical Language Development: A Feasibility Study.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Mar 1;60(3):668-674. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0153.
3
A Clinical Evaluation of the Competing Sources of Input Hypothesis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):104-120. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0448.
4
Subordinate clause comprehension and tense/agreement inconsistency in children with specific language impairment.
J Commun Disord. 2016 Jul-Aug;62:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 7.
5
Why does parental language input style predict child language development? A twin study of gene-environment correlation.
J Commun Disord. 2015 Sep-Oct;57:106-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
6
The efficacy of recasts in language intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 May;24(2):237-55. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0105.
8
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition.
J Child Lang. 2015 Mar;42(2):239-73. doi: 10.1017/S030500091400049X.
9
Input sources of third person singular -s inconsistency in children with and without specific language impairment.
J Child Lang. 2015 Jul;42(4):786-820. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000397. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
Variability in the language input to children enhances learning in a treatment context.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Nov;23(4):530-45. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0038.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验