Kang Qiangjun, Li Ximing, Cheng Zishen, Liu Chang'An
Department of Orthopedics, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050082, P.R. China.
Department of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jun;13(6):2927-2933. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4293. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
The clinical effects and safety of release and decompression techniques on nerve roots through percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) while treating patients with central lumbar disc herniation (CLDH) were explored. Patient cases of lumbar and leg pain treated in Bethune International Peace Hospital from July 2013 to October 2015 were collected retrospectively. The patients in these cases received imaging examinations such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Among these cases, 37 CLDH patients with no other complications were selected for this study. A total of 22 males and 15 females aged 28-54 years, with an average age of 36.8±1.5 years, were the subjects of the study. Their disease course was from 1 month to 3 years, with a median course time of 1.5 years. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring and the MacNab method were used to evaluate treatment effects. After permission from patients or their family members, release and decompression techniques of nerve roots were performed through PTED. All patients had successful surgery. Their average surgery time was 41.3 (25.5-57.1) min. A physician followed-up each patient from 0 to 18 months after surgery, with the average follow-up period of 12.1 months. VAS scoring of lower limbs was 7.95±0.82 before surgery and 2.28±0.35, 3 months after surgery. VAS scoring of lower limbs was 2.06±0.58, 1 year after surgery and 2.12±0.23 at the last follow-up appointment. JOA scoring was 12.6±0.72 before surgery and 20.4±1.08, 3 months after surgery. JOA scoring was 21.1±0.82 1 year after surgery and 21.2±0.36 at the last follow-up. Differences are of statistical significance (P<0.05). There were no complications for any of the cases. One patient did not improve after surgery, so a laminectomy and bone grafting internal fixation were performed. Two patients relapsed after surgery and received laminectomy and bone grafting internal fixation. The total percentage of excellent and good rates was 83.5%. In conclusion, release and decompression techniques on nerve roots using PTED while treating CLDH resulted in a safe, effective and less traumatic outcome with fewer complications and quicker pain relief than alternative treatments. Due to the results of this study, the use of these techniques in treating CLDH should be more widely considered.
探讨经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)治疗中央型腰椎间盘突出症(CLDH)时神经根松解减压技术的临床疗效及安全性。回顾性收集2013年7月至2015年10月在白求恩国际和平医院治疗的腰腿痛患者病例。这些病例中的患者均接受了计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像等影像学检查。在这些病例中,选取37例无其他并发症的CLDH患者进行本研究。研究对象共22例男性和15例女性,年龄28 - 54岁,平均年龄36.8±1.5岁。病程为1个月至3年,中位病程时间为1.5年。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、日本骨科学会(JOA)评分法和MacNab法评估治疗效果。经患者或其家属同意后,通过PTED实施神经根松解减压技术。所有患者手术均成功。平均手术时间为41.3(25.5 - 57.1)分钟。术后0至18个月由一名医生对每位患者进行随访,平均随访时间为12.1个月。术前下肢VAS评分为7.95±0.82,术后3个月为2.28±0.35。术后1年下肢VAS评分为2.06±0.58,末次随访时为2.12±0.23。术前JOA评分为12.6±0.72,术后3个月为20.4±1.08。术后1年JOA评分为21.1±0.82,末次随访时为21.2±0.36。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有病例均无并发症发生。1例患者术后未改善,行椎板切除术和植骨内固定术。2例患者术后复发,接受了椎板切除术和植骨内固定术。优良率总百分比为83.5%。综上所述,PTED治疗CLDH时采用神经根松解减压技术安全、有效,创伤小,并发症少,疼痛缓解快于其他治疗方法。基于本研究结果,应更广泛地考虑在CLDH治疗中应用这些技术。