Killeen Gerry F, Tatarsky Allison, Diabate Abdoulaye, Chaccour Carlos J, Marshall John M, Okumu Fredros O, Brunner Shannon, Newby Gretchen, Williams Yasmin A, Malone David, Tusting Lucy S, Gosling Roland D
Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, United Republic of Tanzania.
Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 26;2(2):e000211. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000211. eCollection 2017.
Vector control using long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) accounts for most of the malaria burden reductions achieved recently in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). LLINs and IRS are highly effective, but are insufficient to eliminate malaria transmission in many settings because of operational constraints, growing resistance to available insecticides and mosquitoes that behaviourally avoid contact with these interventions. However, a number of substantive opportunities now exist for rapidly developing and implementing more diverse, effective and sustainable malaria vector control strategies for LMICs. For example, mosquito control in high-income countries is predominantly achieved with a combination of mosquito-proofed housing and environmental management, supplemented with large-scale insecticide applications to larval habitats and outdoor spaces that kill off vector populations en masse, but all these interventions remain underused in LMICs. Programmatic development and evaluation of decentralised, locally managed systems for delivering these proactive mosquito population abatement practices in LMICs could therefore enable broader scale-up. Furthermore, a diverse range of emerging or repurposed technologies are becoming available for targeting mosquitoes when they enter houses, feed outdoors, attack livestock, feed on sugar or aggregate into mating swarms. Global policy must now be realigned to mobilise the political and financial support necessary to exploit these opportunities over the decade ahead, so that national malaria control and elimination programmes can access a much broader, more effective set of vector control interventions.
使用长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)和室内滞留喷洒(IRS)进行病媒控制,是最近低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)疟疾负担得以减轻的主要原因。长效驱虫蚊帐和室内滞留喷洒非常有效,但由于操作上的限制、对现有杀虫剂的抗药性不断增强以及蚊子在行为上避免接触这些干预措施,在许多情况下仍不足以消除疟疾传播。然而,现在有一些重要机会,可以为低收入和中等收入国家迅速开发和实施更多样化、有效和可持续的疟疾病媒控制策略。例如,高收入国家的蚊虫控制主要通过防蚊住房和环境管理相结合来实现,并辅以在幼虫栖息地和室外空间大规模施用杀虫剂,以大量消灭病媒种群,但所有这些干预措施在低收入和中等收入国家仍未得到充分利用。因此,对低收入和中等收入国家中用于实施这些积极蚊虫种群减少措施的分散式、地方管理系统进行方案开发和评估,可以实现更广泛的推广。此外,当蚊子进入房屋、在户外觅食、攻击牲畜、吸食糖分或聚集形成交配群时,有各种各样的新兴或重新利用的技术可用于针对蚊子。现在必须调整全球政策,以调动未来十年利用这些机会所需的政治和财政支持,以便国家疟疾控制和消除计划能够获得一套更广泛、更有效的病媒控制干预措施。