Killeen Gerry F, Marshall John M, Kiware Samson S, South Andy B, Tusting Lucy S, Chaki Prosper P, Govella Nicodem J
Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara and Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.
Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Apr 26;2(2):e000212. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000212. eCollection 2017.
Residual malaria transmission can persist despite high coverage with effective long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and/or indoor residual spraying (IRS), because many vector mosquitoes evade them by feeding on animals, feeding outdoors, resting outdoors or rapidly exiting from houses after entering them. However, many of these behaviours that render vectors resilient to control with IRS and LLINs also make them vulnerable to some emerging new alternative interventions. Furthermore, vector control measures targeting preferred behaviours of mosquitoes often force them to express previously rare alternative behaviours, which can then be targeted with these complementary new interventions. For example, deployment of LLINs against vectors that historically fed predominantly indoors on humans typically results in persisting transmission by residual populations that survive by feeding outdoors on humans and animals, where they may then be targeted with vapour-phase insecticides and veterinary insecticides, respectively. So while the ability of mosquitoes to express alternative behaviours limits the impact of LLINs and IRS, it also creates measurable and unprecedented opportunities for deploying complementary additional approaches that would otherwise be ineffective. Now that more diverse vector control methods are finally becoming available, well-established entomological field techniques for surveying adult mosquito behaviours should be fully exploited by national malaria control programmes, to rationally and adaptively map out new opportunities for their effective deployment.
尽管长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)和/或室内滞留喷洒(IRS)的覆盖率很高,但残余疟疾传播仍可能持续存在,因为许多媒介蚊子通过吸食动物血液、在户外进食、在户外休息或进入房屋后迅速离开房屋来躲避这些防控措施。然而,许多使媒介对IRS和LLINs控制具有抗性的行为,也使它们容易受到一些新出现的替代干预措施的影响。此外,针对蚊子偏好行为的媒介控制措施往往会迫使它们表现出以前罕见的替代行为,然后可以针对这些行为采取这些补充性的新干预措施。例如,针对历史上主要在室内吸食人血的媒介部署LLINs,通常会导致残余种群持续传播疟疾,这些残余种群通过在户外吸食人和动物的血液生存,在这种情况下,它们可能分别会受到气相杀虫剂和兽用杀虫剂的针对性防控。因此,虽然蚊子表现出替代行为的能力限制了LLINs和IRS的影响,但它也为部署原本无效的补充性额外方法创造了可衡量且前所未有的机会。既然最终有了更多样化的媒介控制方法,国家疟疾控制项目应充分利用成熟的昆虫学野外技术来调查成年蚊子的行为,以便合理且适应性地规划有效部署这些方法的新机会。