Mittelmark Maurice B., Bauer Georg F.
Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Division of Public and Organizational Health, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
The term salutogenesis is associated with a variety of meanings that Aaron Antonovsky introduced in his 1979 book and expounded in many subsequent works. In its most thoroughly explicated meaning, salutogenesis refers to a model described in detail in , which posits that life experiences help shape one’s sense of coherence (a global orientation); life is understood as more or less comprehensible, meaningful and manageable. A strong sense of coherence helps one mobilise resources to cope with stressors and manage tension successfully. Through this mechanism, the sense of coherence helps determine one’s movement on the health Ease/Dis-ease continuum. In its most particular meaning, salutogenesis is almost equivalent to the sense of coherence. In its more general meaning, salutogenesis refers to a scholarly orientation focusing attention on the study of the origins of health, contra the origins of disease. Salutogenesis—model, sense of coherence and orientation—is in harmony with developments across the social sciences that seek better understanding of positive aspects of human experience. For instance, the key concepts of salutogenesis, of positive psychology and of positive organisational behaviour are consonant even if the terminologies are not uniform. It is therefore quite easy to label research and practice in these arenas as having a salutogenic orientation, and use the salutogenesis umbrella metaphor to embrace the cornucopia of scholarly ideas. Among these is the quite specific idea of the sense of coherence, and this meaning of salutogenesis is dominant, at least in the health promotion literature. This is so much so that some equate salutogenesis with the sense of coherence and refer to the sense of coherence as a model or theory (rather than as part of the salutogenic model). This book is about salutogenesis in all these meanings, which are briefly characterised in this chapter, to set the stage for the chapters that follow. We also briefly discuss salutogenesis in relation to other concepts within and beyond the health arena, with which salutogenesis has important kinship.
“健康生成学”一词具有多种含义,这些含义由亚伦·安东诺夫斯基在其1979年出版的书中提出,并在随后的许多著作中进行了阐述。在其最详尽的解释中,健康生成学指的是 中详细描述的一种模型,该模型假定生活经历有助于塑造一个人的连贯感(一种整体取向);人们认为生活或多或少是可理解的、有意义的和可管理的。强烈的连贯感有助于一个人调动资源来应对压力源并成功管理紧张情绪。通过这种机制,连贯感有助于确定一个人在健康/疾病连续体上的状态。在其最特定的含义中,健康生成学几乎等同于连贯感。在其更一般的含义中,健康生成学指的是一种学术取向,将注意力集中在对健康起源的研究上,与疾病起源相对。健康生成学——模型、连贯感和取向——与社会科学领域中寻求更好理解人类积极体验的发展相契合。例如,即使术语不统一,健康生成学、积极心理学和积极组织行为学的关键概念也是一致的。因此,很容易将这些领域的研究和实践标记为具有健康生成学取向,并使用健康生成学的伞状隐喻来涵盖丰富的学术思想。其中包括非常具体的连贯感概念,并且健康生成学的这种含义占主导地位,至少在健康促进文献中是这样。以至于有些人将健康生成学等同于连贯感,并将连贯感称为一种模型或理论(而不是健康生成学模型的一部分)。本书涉及健康生成学的所有这些含义,本章将对这些含义进行简要描述,为后续章节奠定基础。我们还将简要讨论健康生成学与健康领域内外其他概念的关系,健康生成学与这些概念有着重要的联系。