• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药行业决策指南和决策辅助工具对类风湿关节炎患者强化治疗选择影响的比较

Comparison of the Effects of a Pharmaceutical Industry Decision Guide and Decision Aids on Patient Choice to Intensify Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

作者信息

Martin Richard W, Enck Ryan D, Tellinghuisen Donald J, Eggebeen Aaron T, Birmingham James D, Head Andrew J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RWM, ATE, JDB, AJH).

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI, USA (RDE).

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):577-588. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696995. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X17696995
PMID:28590834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5466141/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects a pharmaceutical industry decision guide and International Patient Decision Aids Standard (IPDAS) compliant patient decision aids (PtDA) on patient medication beliefs and choice to intensify therapy.

METHODS

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, who had never taken etanercept (Enbrel), took part in a mail survey. They were presented with a hypothetical decision scenario where they were asked to consider adding etanercept to their current regimen. Each patient was randomized to review 1 of 3 forms of an etanercept-specific decision support: a long PtDA (LONG DA), a short PtDA (SHORT DA), or the manufacturer's Enbrel decision guide (Pharm Booklet).

RESULTS

We had 402 RA patients participate in the study (response rate, 52%). Of the patients randomized to the Pharm Booklet, 30.6% elected to initiate etanercept. Only 14.6% and 14.0% of patients who reviewed the LONG DA or SHORT DA choose to take etanercept (χ2 = 15.7; P < 0.001). Patients who reviewed the LONG DA or SHORT DA had a greater increase in knowledge about etanercept than those who reviewed the Pharm Booklet. There was no difference in decisional conflict among the groups. A logistic regression model explained 44.2% (R = 0.442) of patient choice to intensify therapy by initiating etanercept. The strongest predictor of choice to intensify therapy were beliefs about etanercept's ability to improve symptoms (OR = 2.56, 96%CI [1.71, 3.80]), and its use by others like the respondent (OR = 2.24, 95%CI [1.49, 3.35]). Mediation analysis confirmed the presence of a partial mediating effect of decision support on patients' intent to take etanercept (OR = 0.59, 95%CI [0.39, 0.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients supported by the Pharm Booklet were twice as likely to choose to intensify therapy. The Pharm Booklet's effects are partially mediated through persuasive communication techniques that influence patients' beliefs that symptoms will improve, and increase social normative beliefs, rather than by increasing the relevant knowledge, clarifying patient values about positive or negative treatment outcomes, or increasing their self-efficacy.

摘要

目的

比较一份制药行业决策指南和符合国际患者决策辅助工具标准(IPDAS)的患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)对患者用药信念及强化治疗选择的影响。

方法

从未使用过依那西普(恩利)的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者参与一项邮寄调查。他们面对一个假设的决策情景,被要求考虑在当前治疗方案中加用依那西普。每位患者被随机分配以查看3种依那西普特定决策支持形式中的1种:一份长篇PtDA(LONG DA)、一份短篇PtDA(SHORT DA)或制造商的恩利决策指南(制药手册)。

结果

402名RA患者参与了本研究(应答率为52%)。在被随机分配到制药手册组的患者中,30.6%选择开始使用依那西普。查看长篇PtDA或短篇PtDA的患者中分别只有14.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/43173380a6fa/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/6348c38c11fe/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/c337fbacb228/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/9629f335917d/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/43173380a6fa/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/6348c38c11fe/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/c337fbacb228/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/9629f335917d/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8b5/5466141/43173380a6fa/10.1177_0272989X17696995-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effects of a Pharmaceutical Industry Decision Guide and Decision Aids on Patient Choice to Intensify Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.制药行业决策指南和决策辅助工具对类风湿关节炎患者强化治疗选择影响的比较
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):577-588. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696995. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
2
Evaluation of a patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.一种用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物的患者决策辅助工具的评估
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Oct 28;18(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1138-3.
3
Development of a web-based patient decision aid for initiating disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs using user-centred design methods.使用以用户为中心的设计方法开发一种基于网络的患者决策辅助工具,用于启动改善病情抗风湿药物治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0433-5.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
5
Use of Low-Literacy Decision Aid to Enhance Knowledge and Reduce Decisional Conflict Among a Diverse Population of Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Pilot Study.使用低识字率决策辅助工具提高类风湿性关节炎成年患者群体的知识水平并减少决策冲突:一项试点研究的结果
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jul;68(7):889-98. doi: 10.1002/acr.22801.
6
Medication effectiveness with the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors among Texas Medicaid patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis.德克萨斯州医疗补助计划中诊断为类风湿关节炎的患者使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的药物疗效。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Jul;20(7):657-67. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.7.657.
7
An experimental evaluation of patient decision aid design to communicate the effects of medications on the rate of progression of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.一种用于沟通药物对类风湿关节炎结构关节损伤进展速度影响的患者决策辅助工具设计的实验评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
8
Treatment choices, preferences and decision-making by patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的治疗选择、偏好及决策制定
Musculoskeletal Care. 2008 Mar;6(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/msc.110.
9
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
10
Predictors of remission with etanercept-methotrexate induction therapy and loss of remission with etanercept maintenance, reduction, or withdrawal in moderately active rheumatoid arthritis: results of the PRESERVE trial.在中度活跃性类风湿关节炎中,依那西普-甲氨蝶呤诱导治疗缓解的预测因素和依那西普维持、减少或停药缓解的丧失:PRESERVE 试验的结果。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jan 16;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1484-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to, Facilitators of, and Interventions to Support Treat-to-Target Implementation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.支持类风湿关节炎达标治疗实施的障碍、促进因素和干预措施:系统评价。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;76(12):1626-1636. doi: 10.1002/acr.25408. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Framing Benefits in Decision Aids: Effects of Varying Contextualizing Statements on Decisions About Sacubitril-Valsartan for Heart Failure.在决策辅助工具中构建获益框架:不同情境化陈述对心力衰竭患者使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦决策的影响
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Oct 18;6(2):23814683211041623. doi: 10.1177/23814683211041623. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision-making: easy to evoke, challenging to implement.共同决策:易于引发,实施具有挑战性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):167-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4606.
2
Effects of a patient oriented decision aid for prioritising treatment goals in diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.面向患者的决策辅助工具对糖尿病治疗目标优先级排序的影响:实用随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 Sep 25;349:g5651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5651.
3
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Tools for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
类风湿关节炎患者教育工具的随机对照试验。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Oct;73(10):1470-1478. doi: 10.1002/acr.24362. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
4
"Am I OK?" using human centered design to empower rheumatoid arthritis patients through patient reported outcomes.“我还好吗?”——通过患者报告结局,以人本主义设计赋能类风湿关节炎患者。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
呈现决策结果的定量信息:为患者决策辅助工具开发者提供风险沟通基础
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
4
Providing information about options in patient decision aids.提供患者决策辅助工具中各种选择的相关信息。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S4. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
5
"Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.“路漫漫其修远兮……”:一项将患者决策支持干预措施融入常规临床实践中的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
6
Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids.国际患者决策辅助标准协作十年:评估患者决策辅助工具质量的核心维度的演变。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S1. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
7
The Drug Facts Box: Improving the communication of prescription drug information.药品说明书:改进处方药信息的沟通。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14069-74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214646110. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
Influence of patient characteristics on perceived risks and willingness to take a proposed anti-rheumatic drug.患者特征对感知风险和接受拟用抗风湿药物意愿的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 12;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-89.
9
Pharmaceutical "nudging"--reinterpreting the ethics of evaluative conditioning.药物“助推”——重新诠释评价性条件反射的伦理问题
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(5):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776136.
10
The dilemma in regulating drug advertising: propositional versus nonpropositional content.药品广告监管中的困境:命题内容与非命题内容
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(5):16-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776359.