• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Am I OK?" using human centered design to empower rheumatoid arthritis patients through patient reported outcomes.“我还好吗?”——通过患者报告结局,以人本主义设计赋能类风湿关节炎患者。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
2
Patient-reported outcomes in RA care improve patient communication, decision-making, satisfaction and confidence: qualitative results.类风湿关节炎护理中的患者报告结局可改善患者沟通、决策、满意度和信心:定性结果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1662-1670. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez506.
3
Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study.利用技术接受模型评估临床医生对类风湿关节炎结果仪表板的看法和体验:定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 27;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02530-2.
4
Patient and clinician perspectives on a patient-facing dashboard that visualizes patient reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.患者和临床医生对类风湿关节炎患者报告结局可视化的面向患者的仪表盘的看法。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):846-859. doi: 10.1111/hex.13057. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
Patient perceptions of an electronic-health-record-based rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: a mixed-methods study.基于电子病历的类风湿关节炎结果数据仪表盘的患者感知:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02696-9.
6
Call for action: how to improve use of patient-reported outcomes to guide clinical decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.行动呼吁:如何改善患者报告结局的使用以指导类风湿关节炎的临床决策。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Jun;38(6):935-947. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4005-5. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
English language proficiency, health literacy, and trust in physician are associated with shared decision making in rheumatoid arthritis.英语水平、健康素养以及对医生的信任与类风湿关节炎的共同决策相关。
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;41(7):1290-7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131350.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Rheumatology outcomes: the patient's perspective. A multicentre focus group interview study of Swedish rheumatoid arthritis patients.风湿病治疗结果:患者视角。一项针对瑞典类风湿关节炎患者的多中心焦点小组访谈研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jan;44(1):105-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh412. Epub 2004 Sep 20.
10
Group cognitive-behavioural programme to reduce the impact of rheumatoid arthritis fatigue: the RAFT RCT with economic and qualitative evaluations.群组认知行为方案对减轻类风湿关节炎疲劳的影响:RAFT RCT 伴有经济和定性评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(57):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta23570.

引用本文的文献

1
A step-by-step roadmap for the development and deployment of an electronic health record sidecar application that tracks patient outcomes: The RA PRO dashboard.用于开发和部署跟踪患者治疗结果的电子健康记录边车应用程序的分步路线图:RA PRO仪表板。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 10;10:20552076241288739. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288739. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.纳入患者报告结局指标的临床仪表盘设计组件集:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 2;26:e55267. doi: 10.2196/55267.
3
Using the technology acceptance model to assess clinician perceptions and experiences with a rheumatoid arthritis outcomes dashboard: qualitative study.利用技术接受模型评估临床医生对类风湿关节炎结果仪表板的看法和体验:定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 27;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02530-2.
4
Enhancing Care Partnerships Using a Rheumatology Dashboard: Bringing Together What Matters Most to Both Patients and Clinicians.使用风湿病仪表盘加强护理伙伴关系:汇集对患者和临床医生最重要的因素。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;5(4):190-200. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11533. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
The Challenges Toward Real-world Implementation of Digital Health Design Approaches: Narrative Review.数字健康设计方法在现实世界中实施面临的挑战:叙事性综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 9;9(3):e35693. doi: 10.2196/35693.
6
Informing the Design of Data Visualization Tools to Monitor the COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal: A Web-Delphi Participatory Approach.利用网络德尔菲法为监测葡萄牙新冠疫情设计数据可视化工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):11012. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711012.
7
From Digital Health to Digital Well-being: Systematic Scoping Review.从数字健康到数字福祉:系统范围界定综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 4;24(4):e33787. doi: 10.2196/33787.
8
Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.支持儿科风湿性疾病联合照护的电子仪表盘协同设计:以人为本的设计与可用性测试
J Particip Med. 2022 Apr 22;14(1):e34735. doi: 10.2196/34735.
9
Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review.以人为中心的电子健康发展方法:叙事范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e31858. doi: 10.2196/31858.
10
The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices.以人为本的设计方法在健康研究和创新中的应用:当前实践的叙述性综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28102. doi: 10.2196/28102.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging the electronic health record to improve quality and safety in rheumatology.利用电子健康记录改善风湿病学的质量和安全性。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Oct;37(10):1603-1610. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3804-4. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
Comparison of the Effects of a Pharmaceutical Industry Decision Guide and Decision Aids on Patient Choice to Intensify Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis.制药行业决策指南和决策辅助工具对类风湿关节炎患者强化治疗选择影响的比较
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):577-588. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17696995. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
3
Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness: A National Informatics-Enabled Registry for Quality Improvement.风湿性疾病疗效信息系统:一个基于信息学的全国质量改进登记系统。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1866-1873. doi: 10.1002/acr.23089.
4
Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science.以患者为中心的注册系统可以改善健康、医疗和科学。
BMJ. 2016 Jul 1;354:i3319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3319.
5
Evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: results of a systematic literature search update.类风湿关节炎达标治疗的证据:系统文献检索更新结果
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):e35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209094. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
Effects of Achieving Target Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis on Functional Status, Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization: Analysis of Clinical Practice Data.类风湿关节炎达标治疗对功能状态、生活质量及资源利用的影响:临床实践数据分析
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Mar;68(3):308-17. doi: 10.1002/acr.22678.
7
Use of Decision Support for Improved Knowledge, Values Clarification, and Informed Choice in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.在类风湿关节炎患者中使用决策支持以提高知识水平、明确价值观并做出明智选择。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Nov;67(11):1496-502. doi: 10.1002/acr.22659.
8
The design of a low literacy decision aid about rheumatoid arthritis medications developed in three languages for use during the clinical encounter.一种针对类风湿性关节炎药物的低识字率决策辅助工具的设计,该工具以三种语言开发,用于临床会诊期间。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 25;14:104. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0104-8.
9
Balance Sheets Versus Decision Dashboards to Support Patient Treatment Choices: A Comparative Analysis.支持患者治疗选择的资产负债表与决策仪表板:一项比较分析。
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):499-505. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0111-6.
10
Improving the quality of care of patients with rheumatic disease using patient-centric electronic redesign software.使用以患者为中心的电子重新设计软件提高风湿病患者的护理质量。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):546-53. doi: 10.1002/acr.22479.

“我还好吗?”——通过患者报告结局,以人本主义设计赋能类风湿关节炎患者。

"Am I OK?" using human centered design to empower rheumatoid arthritis patients through patient reported outcomes.

机构信息

SOM Tech, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 654 Minnesota St, San Francisco, CA, 94107, United States.

Division of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.016
PMID:30446358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6421089/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the routine care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been shown to improve health outcomes, However, integration of PROs into the clinical visit is inconsistent. We aimed to develop a "dashboard" for RA patients to display relevant PRO measures for discussion during a routine RA clinical visit.

METHODS

Patients (N = 45) and providers (N = 12) were recruited from rheumatology clinics at a university center and a safety net hospital. Using a human-centered design process involving patients, clinicians, designers, and health-IT experts, we performed interviews, clinic observations, and focus groups, which subsequently guided an iterative phase of prototype testing.

RESULTS

RA patients and their providers shared the goals of assessing wellbeing and developing a personalized treatment plan. We found conflicting views of which data were most important for guiding decision-making and for answering the patient's overarching question of "Am I OK?"

CONCLUSION

The final dashboard simplified the display of PRO data and correlated it longitudinally to the patient's medication regimen. It also included laboratory values relevant for RA care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

By presenting data graphically, the dashboard may provide a platform for patients and providers to communicate around PROs and shared goals.

摘要

目的

在类风湿关节炎(RA)的常规护理中使用患者报告的结果(PROs)已被证明可以改善健康结果,然而,PROs 整合到临床就诊中的情况并不一致。我们旨在为 RA 患者开发一个“仪表盘”,以便在常规 RA 临床就诊中讨论相关的 PRO 措施。

方法

从一所大学中心和一家安全网医院的风湿病诊所招募了患者(N=45)和提供者(N=12)。我们采用以人为中心的设计过程,涉及患者、临床医生、设计师和健康信息技术专家,进行了访谈、诊所观察和焦点小组,随后指导了原型测试的迭代阶段。

结果

RA 患者及其提供者都希望评估整体健康状况并制定个性化的治疗计划。我们发现,对于哪些数据对于指导决策以及回答患者的总体问题“我还好吗?”,存在不同的看法。

结论

最终的仪表盘简化了 PRO 数据的显示,并将其与患者的药物治疗方案进行了纵向关联。它还包括了与 RA 护理相关的实验室值。

实践意义

通过以图形方式呈现数据,仪表盘可以为患者和提供者提供一个围绕 PROs 和共同目标进行沟通的平台。