Hawking Meredith Kd, Lecky Donna M, Touboul Lundgren Pia, Aldigs Eman, Abdulmajed Hind, Ioannidou Eleni, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi Demetra, Khouri Pauline, Gal Micaela, Hadjichambis Andreas Ch, Mappouras Demetrios, McNulty Cliodna Am
Department of Microbiology, Public Health England Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK.
Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e015308. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015308.
To understand attitudes and behaviours of adolescents towards antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance and respiratory tract infections.
Qualitative approach informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were undertaken. We aimed to inform the development of an intervention in an international setting to improve antibiotic use among adolescents; therefore on completion of thematic analysis, findings were triangulated with qualitative data from similar studies in France, Saudi Arabia and Cyprus to elucidate differences in the behaviour change model and adaptation to diverse contexts.
7 educational establishments from the south of England.
53 adolescents (16-18 years) participated in seven focus groups and 21 participated in interviews.
Most participants had taken antibiotics and likened them to other common medications such as painkillers; they reported that their peers treat antibiotics like a 'cure-all' and that they themselves were not interested in antibiotics as a discussion topic. They demonstrated low knowledge of the difference between viral and bacterial infections.Participants self-cared for colds and flu but believed antibiotics are required to treat other RTIs such as tonsillitis, which they perceived as more 'serious'. Past history of taking antibiotics for RTIs instilled the belief that antibiotics were required for future RTIs. Those who characterised themselves as 'non-science students' were less informed about antibiotics and AMR. Most participants felt that AMR was irrelevant to them and their peers. Some 'non-science' students thought resistance was a property of the body, rather than bacteria.
Addressing adolescents' misperceptions about antibiotics and the treatment of RTIs using a behaviour change intervention should help improve antibiotic awareness and may break the cycle of patient demand for antibiotics to treat RTIs amongst this group. Schools should consider educating all students in further education about antibiotic usage and AMR, not only those taking science.
了解青少年对抗生素、抗菌药物耐药性及呼吸道感染的态度和行为。
采用基于计划行为理论的定性研究方法。进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。我们旨在为一项国际干预措施的制定提供信息,以改善青少年对抗生素的使用;因此,在主题分析完成后,将研究结果与法国、沙特阿拉伯和塞浦路斯类似研究的定性数据进行三角互证,以阐明行为改变模型的差异以及对不同背景的适应性。
英格兰南部的7所教育机构。
53名青少年(16 - 18岁)参加了7个焦点小组讨论,21名参加了访谈。
大多数参与者服用过抗生素,并将其与止痛药等其他常见药物相提并论;他们报告称,同龄人将抗生素视为“万灵药”,而他们自己对将抗生素作为讨论话题并不感兴趣。他们对病毒感染和细菌感染之间的差异了解甚少。参与者自行护理感冒和流感,但认为治疗扁桃体炎等其他呼吸道感染需要使用抗生素,他们认为这些感染更“严重”。过去因呼吸道感染服用抗生素的经历使他们坚信未来治疗呼吸道感染仍需要使用抗生素。那些将自己描述为“非理科学生”的人对抗生素和抗菌药物耐药性了解较少。大多数参与者认为抗菌药物耐药性与他们及同龄人无关。一些“非理科”学生认为耐药性是身体的特性,而非细菌的特性。
通过行为改变干预来解决青少年对抗生素及呼吸道感染治疗的误解,应有助于提高对抗生素的认识,并可能打破该群体中患者因治疗呼吸道感染而对抗生素产生需求的循环。学校应考虑对所有接受继续教育的学生进行抗生素使用和抗菌药物耐药性教育,而不仅仅是理科学生。