Zhao Zhiguo, Wickersham Nancy, Kangelaris Kirsten N, May Addison K, Bernard Gordon R, Matthay Michael A, Calfee Carolyn S, Koyama Tatsuki, Ware Lorraine B
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
The Institution for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4854-5. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Mortality prediction in ARDS is important for prognostication and risk stratification. However, no prediction models have been independently validated. A combination of two biomarkers with age and APACHE III was superior in predicting mortality in the NHLBI ARDSNet ALVEOLI trial. We validated this prediction tool in two clinical trials and an observational cohort.
The validation cohorts included 849 patients from the NHLBI ARDSNet Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT), 144 patients from a clinical trial of sivelestat for ARDS (STRIVE), and 545 ARDS patients from the VALID observational cohort study. To evaluate the performance of the prediction model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), model discrimination, and calibration were assessed, and recalibration methods were applied.
The biomarker/clinical prediction model performed well in all cohorts. Performance was better in the clinical trials with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.70-0.79) in FACTT, compared to 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.77) in VALID, a more heterogeneous observational cohort. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76) when FACTT and VALID were combined.
We validated a mortality prediction model for ARDS that includes age, APACHE III, surfactant protein D, and interleukin-8 in a variety of clinical settings. Although the model performance as measured by AUC was lower than in the original model derivation cohort, the biomarker/clinical model still performed well and may be useful for risk assessment for clinical trial enrollment, an issue of increasing importance as ARDS mortality declines, and better methods are needed for selection of the most severely ill patients for inclusion.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的死亡率预测对于预后评估和风险分层很重要。然而,尚无预测模型得到独立验证。在国家心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络(ARDSNet)肺泡试验中,两种生物标志物与年龄及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)相结合在预测死亡率方面表现更优。我们在两项临床试验和一个观察性队列中对该预测工具进行了验证。
验证队列包括来自NHLBI ARDSNet液体与导管治疗试验(FACTT)的849例患者、来自西维来司他治疗ARDS的一项临床试验(STRIVE)的144例患者,以及来自VALID观察性队列研究的545例ARDS患者。为评估预测模型的性能,对受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、模型辨别力和校准进行了评估,并应用了重新校准方法。
生物标志物/临床预测模型在所有队列中表现良好。在临床试验中性能更佳,FACTT的AUC为0.74(95%置信区间0.70 - 0.79),而VALID这个更具异质性的观察性队列的AUC为0.72(95%置信区间0.67 - 0.77)。将FACTT和VALID合并时,AUC为0.73(95%置信区间0.70 - 0.76)。
我们在多种临床环境中验证了一种用于ARDS的死亡率预测模型,该模型包括年龄、APACHE III、表面活性蛋白D和白细胞介素-8。尽管通过AUC衡量的模型性能低于原始模型推导队列,但生物标志物/临床模型仍表现良好,可能有助于临床试验入组的风险评估,随着ARDS死亡率下降,这一问题日益重要,并且需要更好的方法来选择病情最严重的患者纳入研究。