Olsen Johan G, Teilum Kaare, Kragelund Birthe B
Structural Biology and NMR Laboratory (SBiNLab) and the Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017 Sep;74(17):3175-3183. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2560-7. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) do not, by themselves, fold into a compact globular structure. They are extremely dynamic and flexible, and are typically involved in signalling and transduction of information through binding to other macromolecules. The reason for their existence may lie in their malleability, which enables them to bind several different partners with high specificity. In addition, their interactions with other macromolecules can be regulated by a variable amount of chemically diverse post-translational modifications. Four kinetically and energetically different types of complexes between an IDP and another macromolecule are reviewed: (1) simple two-state binding involving a single binding site, (2) avidity, (3) allovalency and (4) fuzzy binding; the last three involving more than one site. Finally, a qualitative definition of fuzzy binding is suggested, examples are provided, and its distinction to allovalency and avidity is highlighted and discussed.
内在无序蛋白(IDP)自身不会折叠成紧密的球状结构。它们极其动态且灵活,通常通过与其他大分子结合参与信号传导和信息转导。它们存在的原因可能在于其可塑性,这使它们能够以高特异性结合几种不同的伴侣。此外,它们与其他大分子的相互作用可通过数量可变的化学性质多样的翻译后修饰来调节。本文综述了IDP与另一种大分子之间四种动力学和能量学上不同类型的复合物:(1)涉及单个结合位点的简单双态结合,(2)亲合力,(3)异价性和(4)模糊结合;后三种涉及多个位点。最后,提出了模糊结合的定性定义,给出了示例,并强调和讨论了其与异价性和亲合力的区别。