• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极端模糊性:两个 IDP 之间的直接相互作用。

Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions between Two IDPs.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Multiscale Research Institute of Complex Systems, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.

出版信息

Biomolecules. 2019 Feb 26;9(3):81. doi: 10.3390/biom9030081.

DOI:10.3390/biom9030081
PMID:30813629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6468500/
Abstract

Protein interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) greatly extend the range of binding mechanisms available to proteins. In interactions employing coupled folding and binding, IDPs undergo disorder-to-order transitions to form a complex with a well-defined structure. In many other cases, IDPs retain structural plasticity in the final complexes, which have been defined as the fuzzy complexes. While a large number of fuzzy complexes have been characterized with variety of fuzzy patterns, many of the interactions are between an IDP and a structured protein. Thus, whether two IDPs can interact directly to form a fuzzy complex without disorder-to-order transition remains an open question. Recently, two studies of interactions between IDPs (4.1G-CTD/NuMA and H1/ProTα) have found a definite answer to this question. Detailed characterizations combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation demonstrate that direct interactions between these two pairs of IDPs do form fuzzy complexes while retaining the conformational dynamics of the isolated proteins, which we name as the extremely fuzzy complexes. Extreme fuzziness completes the full spectrum of protein-protein interaction modes, suggesting that a more generalized model beyond existing binding mechanisms is required. Previous models of protein interaction could be applicable to some aspects of the extremely fuzzy interactions, but in more general sense, the distinction between native and nonnative contacts, which was used to understand protein folding and binding, becomes obscure. Exploring the phenomenon of extreme fuzziness may shed new light on molecular recognition and drug design.

摘要

涉及无规卷曲蛋白质(IDPs)的蛋白质相互作用极大地扩展了蛋白质可用的结合机制的范围。在采用耦合折叠和结合的相互作用中,IDP 经历无序到有序的转变,形成具有明确定义结构的复合物。在许多其他情况下,IDP 在最终复合物中保持结构的可塑性,这些复合物被定义为模糊复合物。虽然已经用各种模糊模式对大量模糊复合物进行了表征,但许多相互作用是在 IDP 和结构蛋白之间发生的。因此,两个 IDP 是否可以直接相互作用形成模糊复合物而不经历无序到有序的转变仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。最近,两项关于 IDP 之间相互作用的研究(4.1G-CTD/NuMA 和 H1/ProTα)对这个问题给出了明确的答案。详细的特征分析结合核磁共振(NMR)、单分子Förster 共振能量转移(smFRET)和分子动力学(MD)模拟表明,这两对 IDP 之间的直接相互作用确实形成了模糊复合物,同时保留了分离蛋白质的构象动力学,我们将其命名为极其模糊复合物。极端模糊性完成了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用模式的完整范围,表明需要超越现有结合机制的更广义模型。蛋白质相互作用的先前模型可能适用于极其模糊相互作用的某些方面,但更一般地说,用于理解蛋白质折叠和结合的天然和非天然接触之间的区别变得模糊。探索极端模糊性的现象可能会为分子识别和药物设计提供新的思路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/01955e9bb3f2/biomolecules-09-00081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/a5400ff2d59c/biomolecules-09-00081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/b17a52fb870a/biomolecules-09-00081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/01955e9bb3f2/biomolecules-09-00081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/a5400ff2d59c/biomolecules-09-00081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/b17a52fb870a/biomolecules-09-00081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f705/6468500/01955e9bb3f2/biomolecules-09-00081-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions between Two IDPs.极端模糊性:两个 IDP 之间的直接相互作用。
Biomolecules. 2019 Feb 26;9(3):81. doi: 10.3390/biom9030081.
2
The Dynamic Multisite Interactions between Two Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.两种固有无序蛋白质之间的动态多点相互作用。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jun 19;56(26):7515-7519. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701883. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
The sequence-ensemble relationship in fuzzy protein complexes.模糊蛋白复合物中的序列-集合关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 14;118(37). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020562118.
4
Deciphering the Dynamic Interaction Profile of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein by NMR Exchange Spectroscopy.通过 NMR 交换光谱学破译无序蛋白的动态相互作用谱。
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Jan 24;140(3):1148-1158. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12407. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Theoretical perspectives on nonnative interactions and intrinsic disorder in protein folding and binding.蛋白质折叠与结合中非天然相互作用及内在无序的理论观点。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015 Feb;30:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.通过偶联折叠和结合来识别无规卷曲蛋白质的分子特征。
Protein Sci. 2019 Nov;28(11):1952-1965. doi: 10.1002/pro.3718. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
7
The importance of the compact disordered state in the fuzzy interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.紧密无序状态在内在无序蛋白质模糊相互作用中的重要性。
Chem Sci. 2022 Jan 28;13(8):2363-2377. doi: 10.1039/d1sc06825c. eCollection 2022 Feb 23.
8
The Thermodynamic Basis of the Fuzzy Interaction of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein.无序蛋白质的模糊相互作用的热力学基础。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Nov 13;56(46):14494-14497. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707853. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Modulation of Correlated Segment Fluctuations in IDPs upon Complex Formation as an Allosteric Regulatory Mechanism.构象变化对无规卷曲多肽形成复合物后相关片段波动的调控:一种变构调节机制。
J Mol Biol. 2018 Aug 3;430(16):2439-2452. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.035. Epub 2018 May 5.
10
Single-Molecule FRET of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.单分子荧光共振能量转移技术在无序蛋白质研究中的应用
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2020 Apr 20;71:391-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-012420-104917. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Conformational modulation of intrinsically disordered transactivation domains for cancer therapy.用于癌症治疗的内在无序反式激活结构域的构象调节
PNAS Nexus. 2025 May 9;4(5):pgaf152. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf152. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Isoform-specific C-terminal phosphorylation drives autoinhibition of Casein kinase 1.异构体特异性的C末端磷酸化驱动酪蛋白激酶1的自抑制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 8;121(41):e2415567121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415567121. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
3
Isoform-specific C-terminal phosphorylation drives autoinhibition of Casein Kinase 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Binding Affinity and Function of the Extremely Disordered Protein Complex Containing Human Linker Histone H1.0 and Its Chaperone ProTα.包含人类连接组蛋白H1.0及其伴侣蛋白ProTα的极端无序蛋白复合物的结合亲和力与功能
Biochemistry. 2018 Dec 4;57(48):6645-6648. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01075. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Fold or not to fold upon binding - does it really matter?折叠还是不折叠在装订时——真的有关系吗?
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Feb;54:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Targeting intrinsically disordered proteins at the edge of chaos.
异构体特异性的C末端磷酸化驱动酪蛋白激酶1的自抑制。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 29:2023.04.24.538174. doi: 10.1101/2023.04.24.538174.
4
Combined prediction and design reveals the target recognition mechanism of an intrinsically disordered protein interaction domain.联合预测和设计揭示了一个无规则蛋白质相互作用结构域的靶标识别机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 26;120(39):e2305603120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305603120. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Conformational changes in the negative arm of the circadian clock correlate with dynamic interactomes involved in post-transcriptional regulation.昼夜节律负臂构象变化与涉及转录后调控的动态互作组相关。
Cell Rep. 2023 Apr 25;42(4):112376. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112376. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
Highly Charged Proteins and Their Repulsive Interactions Antagonize Biomolecular Condensation.高电荷蛋白质及其排斥相互作用拮抗生物分子凝聚。
JACS Au. 2023 Feb 24;3(3):834-848. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00646. eCollection 2023 Mar 27.
7
Not Only Systemin: Prosystemin Harbors Other Active Regions Able to Protect Tomato Plants.不仅是系统素:前系统素还具有其他能够保护番茄植株的活性区域。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 24;13:887674. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.887674. eCollection 2022.
8
The importance of the compact disordered state in the fuzzy interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.紧密无序状态在内在无序蛋白质模糊相互作用中的重要性。
Chem Sci. 2022 Jan 28;13(8):2363-2377. doi: 10.1039/d1sc06825c. eCollection 2022 Feb 23.
9
The diversity of molecular interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins: A molecular modeling perspective.涉及内在无序蛋白质的分子相互作用的多样性:分子建模视角
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Jun 24;19:3817-3828. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.031. eCollection 2021.
10
Protein-Protein Connections-Oligomer, Amyloid and Protein Complex-By Wide Line H NMR.蛋白质-蛋白质连接体-寡聚体、淀粉样蛋白和蛋白质复合物-通过宽线 H NMR。
Biomolecules. 2021 May 18;11(5):757. doi: 10.3390/biom11050757.
靶向混沌边缘的无序蛋白质。
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jan;24(1):217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
Interactions between the Intrinsically Disordered Proteins β-Synuclein and α-Synuclein.β-突触核蛋白与α-突触核蛋白的相互作用。
Proteomics. 2018 Nov;18(21-22):e1800109. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201800109. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
5
Comparative Analysis of the Conformation, Aggregation, Interaction, and Fibril Morphologies of Human α-, β-, and γ-Synuclein Proteins.人α-、β-和γ-突触核蛋白的构象、聚集、相互作用及原纤维形态的比较分析
Biochemistry. 2018 Jul 3;57(26):3830-3848. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00343. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
Intramolecular Fuzzy Interactions Involving Intrinsically Disordered Domains.涉及内在无序结构域的分子内模糊相互作用。
Front Mol Biosci. 2018 Apr 30;5:39. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00039. eCollection 2018.
7
Fuzziness in Protein Interactions-A Historical Perspective.蛋白质相互作用的模糊性——历史视角。
J Mol Biol. 2018 Aug 3;430(16):2278-2287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Extreme disorder in an ultrahigh-affinity protein complex.超高亲和力蛋白质复合物中的极端无序。
Nature. 2018 Mar 1;555(7694):61-66. doi: 10.1038/nature25762. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
IDPs in macromolecular complexes: the roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies.多价相互作用在不同组装体中的大分子复合物中的内体蛋白:作用。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2018 Apr;49:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Deciphering the Dynamic Interaction Profile of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein by NMR Exchange Spectroscopy.通过 NMR 交换光谱学破译无序蛋白的动态相互作用谱。
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Jan 24;140(3):1148-1158. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12407. Epub 2018 Jan 11.