Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency.
作者信息
Ostermann Jan, Brown Derek S, de Bekker-Grob Esther W, Mühlbacher Axel C, Reed Shelby D
机构信息
Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Discovery Bldg., Ste. 358, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency.对健康干预措施的偏好：提高接受度、依从性和效率。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y.
2
Health Preference Research: An Overview.健康偏好研究：概述
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
3
Symposium Title: Preference Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.研讨会主题：监管决策的偏好证据
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0311-y.
4
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.评估个体患者偏好以指导临床实践。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
5
Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.理解不受患者层面量表混杂因素影响的医疗保健偏好异质性的关键问题及潜在解决方案
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5.
6
A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.系统评价比较离散选择实验和最佳最差量表在医疗保健中偏好 elicitation 的可接受性、有效性和一致性。
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0288-y.
7
Using the Threshold Technique to Elicit Patient Preferences: An Introduction to the Method and an Overview of Existing Empirical Applications.使用阈限技术引出患者偏好：方法介绍及现有实证应用概述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):31-46. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00521-3.
8
Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective.患者偏好与医疗保健结果：生态视角。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Apr;12(2):167-80. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.3.
9
Giving Patients' Preferences a Voice in Medical Treatment Life Cycle: The PREFER Public-Private Project.让患者的偏好贯穿医疗治疗生命周期：PREFER公私合作项目。
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):263-266. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0222-3.
10
Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?将定量患者偏好数据纳入医疗保健决策过程：卫生技术评估是否落后了？
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):249-252. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0305-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Multicomponent intervention for controlling hypertension in the adult rural population of Pakistan: a protocol for a hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness cluster randomised controlled trial.巴基斯坦成年农村人口高血压控制的多组分干预：一项混合型 III 期实施-效果整群随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e100365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100365.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势：一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
The long-term oral health consequences of an amalgam phase-out.汞合金淘汰对长期口腔健康的影响。
Br Dent J. 2025 Apr;238(8):621-629. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7992-5. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
4
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.支持慢性心脏病患者的移动应用功能偏好：离散选择研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556.
5
Influence of context on engagement with COVID-19 testing: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators to testing for healthcare workers, care homes and schools in the UK.背景对新冠病毒检测参与度的影响：对英国医护人员、养老院和学校检测的障碍与促进因素的范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e089062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089062.
6
Key informants' views on the benefits, planning and implementation of workplace oral health promotion programme.关键信息提供者对工作场所口腔健康促进项目的益处、规划与实施的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae198.
7
Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.迈向个性化干预建议：一项关于乳腺癌相关疲劳患者偏好异质性的调查研究
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):23814683241309676. doi: 10.1177/23814683241309676. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
8
Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.伦理框架与全球健康：“不让任何人掉队”原则的叙事性综述。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241288346. doi: 10.1177/00469580241288346.
9
Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.遗传检测预测遗传性癌症风险的偏好：离散选择实验的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):252-268. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241227425. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
10
Preferences of Pregnant and Postpartum Women for Differentiated Service Delivery in Kenya.肯尼亚孕妇和产后妇女对差异化服务提供的偏好。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023 Dec 15;94(5):429-436. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003303. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.评估个体患者偏好以指导临床实践。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
2
Health Preference Research: An Overview.健康偏好研究：概述
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
3
Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.量化健康和医疗保健偏好的选择实验：实践现状
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253-66. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
4
Parameterising User Uptake in Economic Evaluations: The role of discrete choice experiments.在经济评估中对用户接受度进行参数化：离散选择实验的作用。
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):116-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.3297. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
5
Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared.陈述偏好与显示偏好之间的一致性：一项离散选择实验与一项关于疫苗接种行为的行为实验的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 12;15:19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0010-5.
6
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.对照现实世界行为验证案例和联合调查实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2395-400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application.离散选择实验在公共卫生中的预测价值：一项探索性应用
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0115-2.
8
Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey.调查离散选择实验在评估实施研究中的障碍和促进因素方面的补充价值：问卷调查。
Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 1;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-10.
9
Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.五百种救生干预措施及其成本效益。
Risk Anal. 1995 Jun;15(3):369-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x.
Zotero 插件