Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency.
作者信息
Ostermann Jan, Brown Derek S, de Bekker-Grob Esther W, Mühlbacher Axel C, Reed Shelby D
机构信息
Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Discovery Bldg., Ste. 358, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Center for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y.
2
Health Preference Research: An Overview.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
3
Symposium Title: Preference Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0311-y.
4
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
5
Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5.
6
A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0288-y.
7
Using the Threshold Technique to Elicit Patient Preferences: An Introduction to the Method and an Overview of Existing Empirical Applications.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):31-46. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00521-3.
8
Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Apr;12(2):167-80. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.3.
9
Giving Patients' Preferences a Voice in Medical Treatment Life Cycle: The PREFER Public-Private Project.
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):263-266. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0222-3.
10
Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):249-252. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0305-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Multicomponent intervention for controlling hypertension in the adult rural population of Pakistan: a protocol for a hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness cluster randomised controlled trial.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e100365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100365.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
The long-term oral health consequences of an amalgam phase-out.
Br Dent J. 2025 Apr;238(8):621-629. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-7992-5. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
4
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556.
5
Influence of context on engagement with COVID-19 testing: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators to testing for healthcare workers, care homes and schools in the UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):e089062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089062.
6
Key informants' views on the benefits, planning and implementation of workplace oral health promotion programme.
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae198.
7
Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.
MDM Policy Pract. 2025 Jan 13;10(1):23814683241309676. doi: 10.1177/23814683241309676. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
8
Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241288346. doi: 10.1177/00469580241288346.
9
Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):252-268. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241227425. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
10
Preferences of Pregnant and Postpartum Women for Differentiated Service Delivery in Kenya.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023 Dec 15;94(5):429-436. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003303. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
2
Health Preference Research: An Overview.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
3
Choice Experiments to Quantify Preferences for Health and Healthcare: State of the Practice.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253-66. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0232-7.
4
Parameterising User Uptake in Economic Evaluations: The role of discrete choice experiments.
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):116-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.3297. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
5
Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 12;15:19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0010-5.
6
Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2395-400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416587112. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application.
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0115-2.
8
Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey.
Implement Sci. 2009 Mar 1;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-10.
9
Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.
Risk Anal. 1995 Jun;15(3):369-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00330.x.
Zotero 插件