• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.

作者信息

Groothuis-Oudshoorn Catharina G M, Flynn Terry N, Yoo Hong Il, Magidson Jay, Oppe Mark

机构信息

Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty BMS, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.

TF Choices LTD, Nottingham, NG5 8JE, UK.

出版信息

Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5
PMID:29691804
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Key Issues and Potential Solutions for Understanding Healthcare Preference Heterogeneity Free from Patient-Level Scale Confounds.理解不受患者层面量表混杂因素影响的医疗保健偏好异质性的关键问题及潜在解决方案
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0309-5.
2
Symposium Title: Preference Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.研讨会主题：监管决策的偏好证据
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0311-y.
3
Health Preference Research: An Overview.健康偏好研究：概述
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
4
Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency.对健康干预措施的偏好：提高接受度、依从性和效率。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):511-514. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y.
5
A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.系统评价比较离散选择实验和最佳最差量表在医疗保健中偏好 elicitation 的可接受性、有效性和一致性。
Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0288-y.
6
Using the Threshold Technique to Elicit Patient Preferences: An Introduction to the Method and an Overview of Existing Empirical Applications.使用阈限技术引出患者偏好：方法介绍及现有实证应用概述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):31-46. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00521-3.
7
Patient preferences for healthcare delivery through community pharmacy settings in the USA: A discrete choice study.美国患者对通过社区药房提供医疗服务的偏好：一项离散选择研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Dec;42(6):738-749. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12574. Epub 2017 Jun 18.
8
Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.当比较表述偏好时，在医疗相关离散选择实验中考虑规模异质性的会计：系统评价。
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0304-x.
9
Treating, Fast and Slow: Americans' Understanding of and Responses to Low-Value Care.治疗，快与慢：美国人对低价值医疗的理解与应对
Milbank Q. 2017 Mar;95(1):70-116. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12246.
10
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.评估个体患者偏好以指导临床实践。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.

引用本文的文献

1
CMS's Drug Price Negotiation Program 2023 Patient-Focused Listening Sessions: A Descriptive Analysis of Speaker Remarks.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心（CMS）2023年药品价格谈判计划患者聚焦倾听会：发言者言论的描述性分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Jan;9(1):103-113. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00530-6. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
What Can Discrete-Choice Experiments Tell Us about Patient Preferences? An Introduction to Quantitative Analysis of Choice Data.离散选择实验能告诉我们哪些关于患者偏好的信息？选择数据定量分析简介。
Patient. 2024 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00705-7.
3
Scale and rate heterogeneity in the EQ-5D-5L valuation.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.当比较表述偏好时，在医疗相关离散选择实验中考虑规模异质性的会计：系统评价。
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0304-x.
2
Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice.评估个体患者偏好以指导临床实践。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):519-521. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.
3
Health Preference Research: An Overview.健康偏好研究：概述
EQ-5D-5L 量表值的标度和率异质性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Jul 13;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02271-w.
4
Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.普通公众能否在患者偏好研究中代表“高危”群体？类风湿关节炎疾病预防的一个例子。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):189-202. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231218265. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.当前健康相关离散选择实验中偏好异质性会计的实践：系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Oct;40(10):943-956. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01178-y. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Exploring the importance of controlling heteroskedasticity and heterogeneity in health valuation: a case study on Dutch EQ-5D-5L.探讨控制健康估值中异方差和异质性的重要性：以荷兰 EQ-5D-5L 为例。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 May 25;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01989-9.
7
Heterogeneity in Preferences for Anti-coagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation: A Latent Class Analysis.房颤患者对抗凝药物使用偏好的异质性：潜在类别分析。
Patient. 2020 Aug;13(4):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00420-z.
8
Support Tools for Preference-Sensitive Decisions in Healthcare: Where Are We? Where Do We Go? How Do We Get There?医疗保健中偏好敏感决策的支持工具：我们现在何处？我们去向何方？我们如何到达那里？
Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):439-443. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00372-z.
9
Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments.离散选择实验设计中的问题
Patient. 2019 Jun;12(3):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0346-0.
10
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验：过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):507-510. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
4
Giving Patients a Meaningful Voice in United States Regulatory Decision Making: The Role for Health Preference Research.让患者在美国监管决策中拥有有意义的发言权：健康偏好研究的作用。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):523-526. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0250-z.
5
Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments.利用离散选择实验中的偏好对患者和医生进行分类。
Patient. 2014;7(1):5-21. doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0037-9.