Suppr超能文献

一项关于肺动脉高压特定药物转换研究的系统评价。

A systematic review of transition studies of pulmonary arterial hypertension specific medications.

作者信息

Sofer Avraham, Ryan Michael J, Tedford Ryan J, Wirth Joel A, Fares Wassim H

机构信息

1 Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

2 French Hospital Medical Center, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pulm Circ. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):326-338. doi: 10.1177/2045893217706357. Epub 2017 May 12.

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive potentially fatal disease. Multiple pharmacologic options are now available, which facilitated transitions between different therapeutic options, although the evidence for such transitions has not been well described. We sought to review the evidence supporting the safety and/or efficacy of transitioning between PAH-specific medications. We performed a systematic review of all published studies in the Medline database between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2016 reporting on any transition between the currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved PAH-specific medications. Studies reporting on three or more adult patients published in the English language reporting on transitions between FDA-approved PAH medications were extracted and tabulated. Forty-one studies met the selection criteria, nine of which included less than eight patients (and thus were reported separately in the supplement), for a total of 32 studies. Transitioning from parenteral epoprostenol to parenteral treprostinil appears to be safe and efficacious in patients who have less severe disease and more favorable hemodynamics. Transitioning from a prostacyclin analogue to an oral medication may be successful in patients who have favorable hemodynamics and stable disease. There is conflicting evidence supporting the transition from a parenteral to an inhaled prostacyclin analogue, even in patients who are on background oral therapy. Currently, the only evidence in support of transitioning between oral PDE5 inhibitors is from sildenafil to tadalafil. Patients on higher doses of sildenafil are more likely to fail. In patients with liver abnormalities due to bosentan or sitaxentan, the transition to ambrisentan appears to be safe and can result in clinical improvement. Studies regarding PAH medication transitions are limited. Patients who have less severe disease, better functional status, and are on lower medications doses may be more successful at transitioning.

摘要

肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种进行性的潜在致命疾病。目前有多种药物治疗选择,这促进了不同治疗方案之间的转换,尽管这种转换的证据尚未得到充分描述。我们试图回顾支持PAH特异性药物之间转换的安全性和/或有效性的证据。我们对2000年1月1日至2016年6月30日期间Medline数据库中所有发表的研究进行了系统评价,这些研究报告了目前美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的PAH特异性药物之间的任何转换。提取并列表了以英文发表的、报告FDA批准的PAH药物之间转换的、涉及三名或更多成年患者的研究。41项研究符合入选标准,其中9项研究的患者少于8名(因此在补充材料中单独报告),共计32项研究。对于病情较轻、血流动力学较好的患者,从静脉注射依前列醇转换为静脉注射曲前列尼尔似乎是安全有效的。对于血流动力学良好且病情稳定的患者,从前列环素类似物转换为口服药物可能会成功。即使是接受背景口服治疗的患者,支持从静脉注射转换为吸入前列环素类似物的证据也存在矛盾。目前,支持口服磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂之间转换的唯一证据是从西地那非转换为他达拉非。服用较高剂量西地那非的患者更有可能治疗失败。对于因波生坦或西他生坦导致肝脏异常的患者,转换为安立生坦似乎是安全的,并且可以带来临床改善。关于PAH药物转换的研究有限。病情较轻、功能状态较好且药物剂量较低的患者在转换时可能更成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d864/5467943/851958a9b851/10.1177_2045893217706357-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验