Rahman Tanzeelur, Liu Xin, Hussain Sajad, Ahmed Shoaib, Chen Guopeng, Yang Feng, Chen Lilian, Du Junbo, Liu Weiguo, Yang Wenyu
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming Systems in the Southwest, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, China.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0178332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178332. eCollection 2017.
Optimum planting geometries have been shown to increase crop yields in maize-soybean intercrop systems. However, little is known about whether changes in planting geometry improve the seasonal water use of maize and soybean intercrops. We conducted two different field experiments in 2013 and 2014 to investigate the effects of changes in planting geometry on water use efficiency (WUE) and evapotranspiration (ETc) of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] relay strip intercrop systems. Our results showed that the leaf area index of maize for both years where intercropping occurred was notably greater compared to sole maize, thus the soil water content (SWC), soil evaporation (E), and throughfall followed a decreasing trend in the following order: central row of maize strip (CRM) < adjacent row between maize and soybean strip (AR) < central row of soybean strip (CRS). When intercropped, the highest grain yield for maize and total yields were recorded for the 40:120 cm and 40:160 cm planting geometries using 160 cm and 200 cm bandwidth, respectively. By contrast, the highest grain yield of intercropped soybean was appeared for the 20:140 cm and 20:180 cm planting geometries. The largest land equivalent ratios were 1.62 for the 40:120 cm planting geometry and 1.79 for the 40:160 cm planting geometry, indicating that both intercropping strategies were advantageous. Changes in planting geometries did not show any significant effect on the ETc of the maize and soybean intercrops. WUEs in the different planting geometries of intercrop systems were lower compared to sole cropping. However, the highest group WUEs of 23.06 and 26.21 kg ha-1 mm-1 for the 40:120 cm and 40:160 cm planting geometries, respectively, were 39% and 23% higher than those for sole cropping. Moreover, the highest water equivalent ratio values of 1.66 and 1.76 also appeared for the 40:120 cm and 40:160 cm planting geometries. We therefore suggest that an optimum planting geometry of 40:160 cm and bandwidth of 200 cm could be a viable planting pattern management method for attaining high group WUE in maize-soybean intercrop systems.
研究表明,在玉米 - 大豆间作系统中,优化种植几何结构可提高作物产量。然而,对于种植几何结构的变化是否能改善玉米和大豆间作作物的季节性水分利用情况,人们了解甚少。我们在2013年和2014年进行了两项不同的田间试验,以研究种植几何结构变化对玉米(Zea mays L.)和大豆[Glycine max (L.) Merr.]套种间作系统的水分利用效率(WUE)和蒸散量(ETc)的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与单作玉米相比,这两年间作时玉米的叶面积指数显著更高,因此土壤含水量(SWC)、土壤蒸发量(E)和穿透雨呈现出以下递减趋势:玉米带中间行(CRM)<玉米和大豆带之间的相邻行(AR)<大豆带中间行(CRS)。间作时,分别采用160厘米和200厘米带宽,种植几何结构为40:120厘米和40:160厘米时,玉米的最高籽粒产量和总产量被记录下来。相比之下,种植几何结构为20:140厘米和20:180厘米时,间作大豆的籽粒产量最高。种植几何结构为40:120厘米时,最大土地当量比为1.62;种植几何结构为40:160厘米时,最大土地当量比为1.79,这表明两种间作策略都具有优势。种植几何结构的变化对玉米和大豆间作作物的ETc没有显著影响。与单作相比,间作系统不同种植几何结构下的水分利用效率较低。然而分别种植几何结构为40:120厘米和40:160厘米时,最高群体水分利用效率分别为23.06和26.21千克公顷⁻¹毫米⁻¹,比单作分别高39%和23%。此外,种植几何结构为40:120厘米和40:160厘米时,也出现了最高的水分当量比值,分别为1.66和1.76。因此,我们建议种植几何结构为40:160厘米、带宽为200厘米的优化种植模式,可能是一种在玉米 - 大豆间作系统中实现高群体水分利用效率的可行种植模式管理方法。