Suppr超能文献

评估老年人住院期间活动能力的工具:一项系统综述

Instruments to evaluate mobility capacity of older adults during hospitalization: A systematic review.

作者信息

Soares Menezes Karla Vanessa Rodrigues, Auger Claudine, de Souza Menezes Weslley Rodrigues, Guerra Ricardo Oliveira

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Av Sen. Salgado Filho, 3000, Campus Universitário, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.

Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), CRIR-CRLB du CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal |Centre de réadaptation Lucie-Bruneau 2275, avenue Laurier Est Montréal, QC H2H 2N8, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Sep;72:67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 27.

Abstract

Independent mobility is a key factor in predicting morbidity and determining hospital discharge readiness for older patients. The main objective was identify and appraise relevant instruments for the measurement of mobility of hospitalized geriatric patients. A systematic review was performed in two consecutive steps. Based on the definition of mobility of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Step 1 identified mobility measurement instruments used to assess patients 60 years of age and over hospitalized in acute care or intensive geriatric rehabilitation unit. Aim of the instrument, coverage of mobility construct, applicability (format, training required, administration time and use of assistive devices) were extracted. For each included instrument, Step 2 identified and appraised articles reporting about their measurement properties. Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used by two independent reviewers to critically appraise and compare the measurement properties. Step 1 resulted in 6350 articles, of which 28 articles reported about 17 different instruments. Step 2 retained 11 instruments with 70 articles reporting about their measurement properties in various settings. Judgement-based instruments (n=5) covered the ICF mobility construct more broadly than performance-based measures (n=6). Our results showed that 3 instruments (DEMMI, SPPB and Tinetti scale) had the most extensive and robust measurement properties, and from those, SPPB and DEMMI covered the mobility construct more broadly but SPPB had the longest administration (10-15min). Conclusion SPPB presents the best balance between mobility coverage, measurement properties and applicability to acute care or intensive geriatric rehabilitation unit.

摘要

独立活动能力是预测老年患者发病率和确定其出院准备情况的关键因素。主要目的是识别和评估用于测量住院老年患者活动能力的相关工具。分两个连续步骤进行了系统评价。基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)中活动能力的定义。第一步确定了用于评估在急性护理或老年重症康复病房住院的60岁及以上患者的活动能力测量工具。提取了工具的目的、活动能力结构的覆盖范围、适用性(形式、所需培训、管理时间和辅助设备的使用)。对于每个纳入的工具,第二步识别并评估报告其测量属性的文章。两名独立评审员使用基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)对测量属性进行严格评估和比较。第一步产生了6350篇文章,其中28篇文章报告了17种不同的工具。第二步保留了11种工具,有70篇文章报告了它们在各种环境中的测量属性。基于判断的工具(n = 5)比基于表现的测量工具(n = 6)更广泛地涵盖了ICF活动能力结构。我们的结果表明,3种工具(DEMMI、SPPB和Tinetti量表)具有最广泛和最可靠的测量属性,其中,SPPB和DEMMI更广泛地涵盖了活动能力结构,但SPPB的管理时间最长(10 - 15分钟)。结论SPPB在活动能力覆盖范围、测量属性以及对急性护理或老年重症康复病房的适用性之间呈现出最佳平衡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验