de Morton Natalie A, Berlowitz David J, Keating Jennifer L
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jun 5;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-44.
Independent mobility is a key factor in determining readiness for discharge for older patients following acute hospitalisation and has also been identified as a predictor of many important outcomes for this patient group. This review aimed to identify a physical performance instrument that is not disease specific that has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor the mobility of older medical patients in the acute hospital setting.
Databases initially searched were Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restriction or limits on year of publication until July 2005. After analysis of this yield, a second step was the systematic search of Medline, Cinahl and Embase until August 2005 for evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument. Reports were included in this review if instruments described had face validity for measuring from bed bound to independent levels of ambulation, the items were suitable for application in an acute hospital setting and the instrument required observation (rather than self-report) of physical performance. Evidence of the clinical utility of each potentially suitable instrument was considered if data on measurement properties were reported.
Three instruments, the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Hierarchical Assessment of Balance and Mobility (HABAM) and the Physical Performance Mobility Examination (PPME) were identified as potentially relevant. Clinimetric evaluation indicated that the HABAM has the most desirable properties of these three instruments. However, the HABAM has the limitation of a ceiling effect in an older acute medical patient population and reliability and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) estimates have not been reported for the Rasch refined HABAM. These limitations support the proposal that a new mobility instrument is required for older acute medical patients.
No existing instrument has the properties required to accurately measure and monitor mobility of older acute medical patients.
独立活动能力是决定老年患者急性住院后出院准备情况的关键因素,并且也已被确定为该患者群体许多重要预后的预测指标。本综述旨在确定一种非疾病特异性的身体功能评估工具,该工具具有在急性医院环境中准确测量和监测老年内科患者活动能力所需的特性。
最初检索的数据库包括Medline、Cinahl、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,检索时间截至2005年7月,无语言限制和出版年份限制。在对检索结果进行分析后,第二步是在2005年8月之前对Medline、Cinahl和Embase进行系统检索,以获取每种潜在适用工具临床实用性的证据。如果所描述的工具在测量从卧床到独立行走水平方面具有表面效度、项目适合在急性医院环境中应用且该工具需要对身体功能进行观察(而非自我报告),则将相关报告纳入本综述。如果报告了测量特性的数据,则考虑每种潜在适用工具临床实用性的证据。
三种工具,即老年人活动量表(EMS)、平衡与活动能力分级评估(HABAM)和身体功能活动能力检查(PPME)被确定为可能相关。临床测量学评估表明,HABAM在这三种工具中具有最理想的特性。然而,HABAM在老年急性内科患者群体中存在天花板效应的局限性,并且尚未报告Rasch修订版HABAM的可靠性和最小临床重要差异(MCID)估计值。这些局限性支持了为老年急性内科患者开发一种新的活动能力评估工具的提议。
现有的工具均不具备准确测量和监测老年急性内科患者活动能力所需的特性。