Darius Sabine, Bergmann Lisa, Blaschke Saskia, Böckelmann Irina
Bereich Arbeitsmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018 Feb;235(2):212-218. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-109691. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
The aim of the study was to detect gender and age differences in both photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity with different methods in relation to German driver's license regulations (Fahrerlaubnisverordnung; FeV).
We examined 134 healthy volunteers (53 men, 81 women) with an age between 18 and 76 years, that had been divided into two groups (AG I < 45 years old, AG II ≥ 45 years old). Mesopic contrast sensitivity was determined with the Mesotest II. Optovist EU and Rodatest 302 as test devices and VISTECH and Mars charts under standardized illumination were applied for photopic contrast sensitivity.
We could not find any gender differences. When evaluating age, there were no differences between the two groups for the Mars charts nor in the Rodatest. In all other tests, the younger volunteers achieved significantly better results.
For contrast vision, there exists age-adapted cut-off-values. Concerning the driving safety of traffic participants, sufficient photopic and mesopic contrast vision should be focused on, independent of age. Therefore, there is a need to reconsider the age-adapted cut-off-values.
本研究旨在根据德国驾照法规(《驾驶许可条例》;FeV),采用不同方法检测明视觉和中间视觉对比度敏感度方面的性别和年龄差异。
我们检查了134名年龄在18至76岁之间的健康志愿者(53名男性,81名女性),他们被分为两组(第一组<45岁,第二组≥45岁)。使用Mesotest II测定中间视觉对比度敏感度。将Optovist EU和Rodatest 302作为测试设备,并在标准化照明条件下使用VISTECH和Mars图表来测定明视觉对比度敏感度。
我们未发现任何性别差异。在评估年龄时,两组在Mars图表和Rodatest测试中均无差异。在所有其他测试中,较年轻的志愿者取得了明显更好的结果。
对于对比视觉,存在适应年龄的临界值。关于交通参与者的驾驶安全,应关注足够的明视觉和中间视觉对比视觉,而与年龄无关。因此,有必要重新考虑适应年龄的临界值。