Suppr超能文献

一项针对超重和低体重危重症患者补充肠外营养的随机试验:TOP-UP 初步试验。

A randomized trial of supplemental parenteral nutrition in underweight and overweight critically ill patients: the TOP-UP pilot trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC, Box 3094, Mail # 41, 2301 Erwin Road, 5692 HAFS, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

Faculté de Médecine de l'Université de Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg Nouvel Hȏpital Civil, Strasbourg Cedex, France.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2017 Jun 9;21(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1736-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nutrition guidelines recommendations differ on the use of parenteral nutrition (PN), and existing clinical trial data are inconclusive. Our recent observational data show that amounts of energy/protein received early in the intensive care unit (ICU) affect patient mortality, particularly for inadequate nutrition intake in patients with body mass indices (BMIs) of <25 or >35. Thus, we hypothesized increased nutrition delivery via supplemental PN (SPN) + enteral nutrition (EN) to underweight and obese ICU patients would improve 60-day survival and quality of life (QoL) versus usual care (EN alone).

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial completed in 11 centers across four countries, adult ICU patients with acute respiratory failure expected to require mechanical ventilation for >72 hours and with a BMI of <25 or ≥35 were randomized to receive EN alone or SPN + EN to reach 100% of their prescribed nutrition goal for 7 days after randomization. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to achieve a 30% improvement in nutrition delivery.

RESULTS

In total, 125 patients were enrolled. Over the first 7 post-randomization ICU days, patients in the SPN + EN arm had a 26% increase in delivered calories and protein, whereas patients in the EN-alone arm had a 22% increase (both p < 0.001). Surgical ICU patients received poorer EN nutrition delivery and had a significantly greater increase in calorie and protein delivery when receiving SPN versus medical ICU patients. SPN proved feasible to deliver with our prescribed protocol. In this pilot trial, no significant outcome differences were observed between groups, including no difference in infection risk. Potential, although statistically insignificant, trends of reduced hospital mortality and improved discharge functional outcomes and QoL outcomes in the SPN + EN group versus the EN-alone group were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Provision of SPN + EN significantly increased calorie/protein delivery over the first week of ICU residence versus EN alone. This was achieved with no increased infection risk. Given feasibility and consistent encouraging trends in hospital mortality, QoL, and functional endpoints, a full-scale trial of SPN powered to assess these clinical outcome endpoints in high-nutritional-risk ICU patients is indicated-potentially focusing on the more poorly EN-fed surgical ICU setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01206166.

摘要

背景

营养指南建议对肠外营养(PN)的使用存在差异,现有的临床试验数据尚无定论。我们最近的观察性数据表明,重症监护病房(ICU)早期接受的能量/蛋白质量会影响患者的死亡率,尤其是对于 BMI 低于 25 或高于 35 的患者,其营养摄入不足的情况下。因此,我们假设通过补充肠外营养(SPN)+肠内营养(EN)为体重不足和肥胖的 ICU 患者提供更多的营养,与常规治疗(仅接受 EN)相比,会改善 60 天的生存率和生活质量(QoL)。

方法

这是一项在四个国家的 11 个中心进行的多中心、随机、对照的初步试验,纳入了预计需要机械通气超过 72 小时且 BMI 低于 25 或大于 35 的急性呼吸衰竭的成年 ICU 患者,随机接受仅接受 EN 或 SPN+EN 治疗,以在随机分组后 7 天内达到 100%的规定营养目标。该初步试验的主要目的是实现营养供给增加 30%。

结果

共纳入 125 例患者。在随机分组后的前 7 天 ICU 期间,SPN+EN 组的患者热量和蛋白质的供给量增加了 26%,而仅接受 EN 组的患者则增加了 22%(均 P<0.001)。外科 ICU 患者接受的 EN 营养供给较差,与内科 ICU 患者相比,接受 SPN 时热量和蛋白质的供给量显著增加。按照我们的规定方案,SPN 的提供是可行的。在该初步试验中,各组之间未观察到显著的结局差异,包括感染风险无差异。在 SPN+EN 组与仅接受 EN 组之间观察到了潜在的(尽管统计学上无显著性)住院死亡率降低、出院功能结局和 QoL 结局改善的趋势。

结论

与仅接受 EN 相比,在 ICU 入住的前一周内,SPN+EN 显著增加了热量/蛋白质的供给量。这一目标的实现并未增加感染风险。鉴于可行性和对住院死亡率、QoL 和功能终点的持续积极趋势,在高营养风险的 ICU 患者中,需要进行一项使用 SPN 治疗的全面试验,以评估这些临床结局终点,可能重点关注接受 EN 治疗较差的外科 ICU 患者。

试验注册

NCT01206166。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5e7/5466764/0ea9bb9f57d9/13054_2017_1736_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验