Bharucha T, Rutherford A, Skeoch S, Alavi A, Brown M, Galloway J
Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK; Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
NIHR Guy's and St Thomas' Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Rheumatology Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Clin Radiol. 2017 Sep;72(9):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
To perform a systematic review, meta-analysis and Delphi exercise to evaluate diagnostic yield of combined 2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in fever of unknown origin (FUO).
Four databases were searched for studies of FDG-PET/CT in FUO 1/1/2000-1/12/2015. Exclusions were non-English language, case reports, non-standard FDG radiotracer, and significant missing data. Quality was assessed by two authors independently using a standardised tool. Pooled diagnostic yield was calculated using a random-effects model. An iterative electronic and face-to-face Delphi exercise generated interspeciality consensus.
Pooled diagnostic yield was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50-61%, I=61%) from 18 studies and 905 patients. Only five studies reported results of previous imaging, and subgroup analysis estimated diagnostic yield beyond conventional CT at 32% (95% CI: 22-44%; I=66%). Consensus was established that FDG-PET/CT is increasingly available with an emerging role, but there is prevailing variability in practice.
There is insufficient evidence to support the value of FDG-PET/CT in investigative algorithms of FUO. A paradigm shift in research is needed, involving prospective studies recruiting at diagnosis of FUO, with updated case definitions and hard outcome measures. Although these studies will be a significant undertaking with multicentre collaboration, their completion is vital for balancing both radiation exposure and costs against the possible benefits of utilising FDG-PET/CT.
进行一项系统评价、荟萃分析和德尔菲法评估,以评价联合使用2-[F]-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在不明原因发热(FUO)中的诊断率。
检索四个数据库中2000年1月1日至2015年12月1日期间关于FDG-PET/CT在FUO中的研究。排除非英文文献、病例报告、非标准FDG放射性示踪剂以及大量缺失数据。由两位作者独立使用标准化工具评估质量。使用随机效应模型计算合并诊断率。通过迭代电子和面对面德尔菲法达成跨专业共识。
18项研究共905例患者的合并诊断率为56%(95%置信区间[CI]:50-61%,I²=61%)。仅有五项研究报告了先前影像学检查结果,亚组分析估计FDG-PET/CT超出传统CT的诊断率为32%(95%CI:22-44%;I²=66%)。已达成共识,即FDG-PET/CT越来越普及且作用不断显现,但实际应用中仍存在普遍差异。
尚无充分证据支持FDG-PET/CT在FUO诊断算法中的价值。需要进行研究范式转变,开展前瞻性研究,在FUO诊断时纳入研究对象,更新病例定义并采用严格的结局指标。尽管这些研究需要多中心合作,任务艰巨,但完成这些研究对于平衡辐射暴露、成本与使用FDG-PET/CT可能带来的益处至关重要。