Pinto-Grau Marta, Costello Emmet, O'Connor Sarah, Elamin Marwa, Burke Tom, Heverin Mark, Pender Niall, Hardiman Orla
Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Department of Psychology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Neurol. 2017 Jul;264(7):1397-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8536-6. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
The Beaumont Behavioural Inventory (BBI) is a behavioural proxy report for the assessment of behavioural changes in ALS. This tool has been validated against the FrSBe, a non-ALS-specific behavioural assessment, and further comparison of the BBI against a disease-specific tool was considered. This study cross-validates the BBI against the ALS-FTD-Q. Sixty ALS patients, 8% also meeting criteria for FTD, were recruited. All patients were evaluated using the BBI and the ALS-FTD-Q, completed by a carer. Correlational analysis was performed to assess construct validity. Precision, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the BBI when compared to the ALS-FTD-Q, were obtained. The mean score of the whole sample on the BBI was 11.45 ± 13.06. ALS-FTD patients scored significantly higher than non-demented ALS patients (31.6 ± 14.64, 9.62 ± 11.38; p < 0.0001). A significant large positive correlation between the BBI and the ALS-FTD-Q was observed (r = 0.807, p < 0.0001), and no significant correlations between the BBI and other clinical/demographic characteristics indicate good convergent and discriminant validity, respectively. 72% of overall concordance was observed. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity for the classification of severely impaired patients were adequate. However, lower concordance in the classification of mild behavioural changes was observed, with higher sensitivity using the BBI, most likely secondary to BBI items which endorsed behavioural aspects not measured by the ALS-FTD-Q. Good construct validity has been further confirmed when the BBI is compared to an ALS-specific tool. Furthermore, the BBI is a more comprehensive behavioural assessment for ALS, as it measures the whole behavioural spectrum in this condition.
博蒙特行为量表(BBI)是一种用于评估肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)行为变化的行为替代报告。该工具已针对非ALS特异性行为评估工具——功能性行为评估量表(FrSBe)进行了验证,并考虑将BBI与特定疾病工具进行进一步比较。本研究对BBI与ALS-额颞叶痴呆问卷(ALS-FTD-Q)进行了交叉验证。招募了60例ALS患者,其中8%也符合额颞叶痴呆(FTD)标准。所有患者均由照料者使用BBI和ALS-FTD-Q进行评估。进行相关分析以评估结构效度。得出了BBI与ALS-FTD-Q相比的精确性、敏感性、特异性和总体准确性。整个样本在BBI上的平均得分为11.45±13.06。ALS-FTD患者的得分显著高于非痴呆ALS患者(31.6±14.64,9.62±11.38;p<0.0001)。观察到BBI与ALS-FTD-Q之间存在显著的强正相关(r=0.807,p<0.0001),且BBI与其他临床/人口统计学特征之间无显著相关性,分别表明具有良好的聚合效度和区分效度。观察到总体一致性为72%。对严重受损患者进行分类的精确性、敏感性和特异性是足够的。然而,在轻度行为变化分类中观察到较低的一致性,使用BBI时敏感性较高,这很可能是由于BBI项目认可了ALS-FTD-Q未测量的行为方面。当将BBI与特定于ALS的工具进行比较时,进一步证实了其良好的结构效度。此外,BBI是一种更全面的ALS行为评估工具,因为它测量了这种情况下的整个行为谱。