Andrighetti Heather J, Semaka Alicia, Austin Jehannine C
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Rm A3-112, 938 W 28th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Medical Genetics Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Aug;20(4):547-559. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0744-7. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
Barriers to recruitment for research on mental illness include participant distrust of researchers and social stigma. Though these issues may be acutely important in perinatal mental health research, they remain unexplored in this context. In order to inform strategies to more fully engage women in perinatal mental health research, we explored the motivations and experiences of women with a history of major depressive disorder who participated in a prospective longitudinal research study on postpartum depression (PPD). Sixteen women with a history of depression who had either completed or recently made a decision about participation in a longitudinal research study about PPD were interviewed by telephone. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews explored participants' decision-making about, and experiences of, participation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed using elements of grounded theory methodology. Follow-up interviews were conducted with four participants to refine and clarify preliminary results. Foundational elements necessary for women to consider participating in PPD research included personal acceptance of illness and trust in the research team/institution. Other main motivators included perceived personal relevance, anticipated benefits (including access to support/resources, learning opportunities, and improved self-worth), altruism, and accessible study procedures. Our data suggest that participating in perinatal mental health research may help women make meaning of their mental illness experience and is perceived as providing support. The findings-particularly around the importance of participant-researcher rapport and accessibility of study design-may inform strategies that improve participation rates, decrease attrition, and maximize participant benefits in perinatal mental health research.
招募精神疾病研究参与者的障碍包括参与者对研究人员的不信任和社会污名。尽管这些问题在围产期心理健康研究中可能极为重要,但在这一背景下仍未得到充分探索。为了为更全面地让女性参与围产期心理健康研究的策略提供信息,我们探讨了有重度抑郁症病史且参与了一项关于产后抑郁症(PPD)的前瞻性纵向研究的女性的动机和经历。通过电话采访了16名有抑郁症病史且已完成或最近决定是否参与一项关于PPD的纵向研究的女性。定性的半结构化访谈探讨了参与者关于参与的决策过程和经历。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用扎根理论方法的要素进行定性分析。对4名参与者进行了跟进访谈,以完善和澄清初步结果。女性考虑参与PPD研究所需的基本要素包括对疾病的个人接受度以及对研究团队/机构的信任。其他主要动机包括感知到的个人相关性、预期收益(包括获得支持/资源、学习机会以及提升自我价值)、利他主义以及便捷的研究程序。我们的数据表明,参与围产期心理健康研究可能有助于女性理解她们的精神疾病经历,并被视为能提供支持。这些发现——特别是关于参与者与研究人员之间融洽关系的重要性以及研究设计的可及性——可能为提高参与率、减少损耗并使围产期心理健康研究中参与者的收益最大化的策略提供信息。