Soule Michael C, Beale Eleanor E, Suarez Laura, Beach Scott R, Mastromauro Carol A, Celano Christopher M, Moore Shannon V, Huffman Jeff C
a Department of Psychiatry , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
b Department of Psychiatry , Harvard Medical School , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Soc Work Health Care. 2016;55(3):231-46. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2015.1114064. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
By understanding common motivations for participating in observational research studies, clinicians may better understand the perceived benefits of research participation from their clients' perspective. We enrolled 164 cardiac patients in a study about the effects of gratitude and optimism. Two weeks post-enrollment, participants completed a four-item questionnaire regarding motivations for study enrollment. Altruistic motivation ranked highest, while intellectual, health-related, and financial motivations rated lower. Four subgroups of participants emerged, each with distinct characteristics and different priorities for participating. These findings may help front-line clinicians to understand which motivations for participation apply to their clients who enroll in non-treatment-based research projects.
通过了解参与观察性研究的常见动机,临床医生可以从患者的角度更好地理解参与研究的潜在益处。我们招募了164名心脏病患者参与一项关于感恩和乐观情绪影响的研究。入组两周后,参与者完成了一份关于入组动机的四项问卷。利他动机排名最高,而智力、健康相关和经济动机的得分较低。出现了四个参与者亚组,每个亚组都有独特的特征和不同的参与优先级。这些发现可能有助于一线临床医生了解哪些参与动机适用于他们那些参与非治疗性研究项目的患者。