• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰奥塔哥和南地农村地区偏远农村妇女的出生地选择及转诊经历

Remote rural women's choice of birthplace and transfer experiences in rural Otago and Southland New Zealand.

作者信息

Patterson Jean, Foureur Maralyn, Skinner Joan

机构信息

School of Midwifery, Otago Polytechnic, Forth Street, Private Bag 1910, 9054 Dunedin, New Zealand.

Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Level 8, Building 10, City Campus, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2017 Sep;52:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.014
PMID:28600971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Birth in primary midwife-led maternity units has been demonstrated to be a safe choice for well women anticipating a normal birth. The incidence of serious perinatal outcomes for these women is comparable to similarly low risk women, who choose to birth in hospital. New Zealand women have a choice of Lead Maternity Carer (LMC) and birthplace; home, primary birthing unit, or a base hospital, though not all women may have all these choices available locally. Women in rural and rural remote areas can also choose to birth in their rural primary maternity unit. A percentage of these women (approx. 15-17%) will require transfer during labour, an event which can cause distress and often loss of midwifery continuity of care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore retrospectively the choice of birth place decisions and the labour and birth experiences of a sample of women resident in remotely zoned, rural areas of the lower South Island of New Zealand.

DESIGN

A purposive sample of women living in remote rural areas, recruited by advertising in local newspapers and flyers. Individual semi-structured interviews were digitally recorded using a pragmatic interpretive approach. The data (transcripts and field notes) were analysed using thematic and content analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Health and Disability Ethics Committee (HEDC) MEC/06/05/045.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen women consented to participate. Each was resident in a remote rural area having given birth in the previous 18 months. The women had been well during their pregnancies and at the onset of labour had anticipated a spontaneous vaginal birth.

SETTING

Rural remote zoned areas in Otago and Southland in the South Island of New Zealand FINDINGS: Five women planned to birth in a regional hospital and eight chose their nearest rural primary maternity unit. All of the women were aware of the possibility of transfer and had made their decision about their birthplace based on their perception of their personal safety, and in consideration of their distance from specialist care. Themes included, deciding about the safest place to give birth; making the decision to transfer; experiencing transfer in labour, and reflecting on their birth experience and considering future birthplace choices.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND POLICY

The experiences of the women show that for some, distance from a base hospital influences their place of birth decisions in remote rural areas of New Zealand and increases the distress for those needing to transfer over large distances. These experiences can result in women choosing, or needing to make different choices for subsequent births; the consequences of which impact on the future sustainability of midwifery services in remote rural areas, a challenge which resonates with maternity service provision internationally. While choices about birth place cannot be reliably predicted, creative solutions are needed to provide rural midwifery care and birth options for women and more timely and efficient transfer services when required.

摘要

背景

对于预期正常分娩的健康女性而言,在由初级助产士主导的产科病房分娩已被证明是一种安全的选择。这些女性发生严重围产期不良结局的发生率与选择在医院分娩的低风险女性相当。新西兰女性可以选择主要孕产护理人员(LMC)和分娩地点;家中、初级分娩单元或基础医院,不过并非所有女性在当地都能有这些选择。农村及偏远农村地区的女性也可选择在其农村初级产科病房分娩。这些女性中有一定比例(约15% - 17%)在分娩过程中需要转诊,这一情况可能会导致困扰,且常常会使助产护理的连续性中断。

目的

回顾性探究新西兰南岛偏远农村地区部分女性的分娩地点选择决定以及她们的分娩经历。

设计

通过在当地报纸和传单上刊登广告,选取偏远农村地区的女性作为有目的的样本。采用务实的解释性方法对个体进行半结构化访谈,并进行数字录音。使用主题分析和内容分析对数据(文字记录和现场笔记)进行分析。已获得健康与残疾伦理委员会(HEDC)MEC/06/05/045的伦理批准。

参与者

13名女性同意参与。她们均居住在偏远农村地区,且在过去18个月内分娩。这些女性在孕期状况良好,临产前预期会自然阴道分娩。

地点

新西兰南岛奥塔哥和南地的偏远农村地区

研究结果

5名女性计划在地区医院分娩,8名选择了最近的农村初级产科病房。所有女性都知晓转诊的可能性,且她们基于对自身安全的认知以及与专科护理机构的距离做出了分娩地点的决定。主题包括:决定最安全的分娩地点;做出转诊决定;经历分娩过程中的转诊;反思她们的分娩经历并考虑未来的分娩地点选择。

结论及对实践和政策的启示

这些女性的经历表明,对于一些人来说,与基础医院的距离会影响她们在新西兰偏远农村地区的分娩地点决定,并增加那些需要长途转诊的女性的困扰。这些经历可能导致女性在后续分娩时选择或需要做出不同的选择;其后果会影响偏远农村地区助产服务未来的可持续性,这一挑战在国际产服务提供中也存在。虽然无法可靠预测分娩地点的选择,但需要创造性的解决方案,为女性提供农村助产护理和分娩选择,并在需要时提供更及时、高效的转诊服务。

相似文献

1
Remote rural women's choice of birthplace and transfer experiences in rural Otago and Southland New Zealand.新西兰奥塔哥和南地农村地区偏远农村妇女的出生地选择及转诊经历
Midwifery. 2017 Sep;52:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 29.
2
Women׳s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand.女性分娩地点的决策,信心的作用:新西兰评估产科病房研究的一部分。
Midwifery. 2015 Jun;31(6):597-605. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰女性从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院的经历:前瞻性队列评估产科单位研究的一部分。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 18;15:339. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0770-2.
4
Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰从初级产科单位转诊至三级医院——时间、频率、原因、紧迫性及结果:评估产科单位研究的一部分
Midwifery. 2015 Sep;31(9):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 5.
5
An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.新西兰女性出生地决策影响因素的探索:“评估产科单位”研究中的一项混合方法前瞻性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jun 20;14:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-210.
6
Midwives׳ decision making about transfers for 'slow' labour in rural New Zealand.新西兰农村地区助产士对“产程缓慢”产妇转诊的决策
Midwifery. 2015 Jun;31(6):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
7
Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.出生地选择:英国的女性在选择分娩地点时需要哪些信息?一项使用在线和面对面焦点小组的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1601-4.
8
What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.在英国,对于怀孕过程顺利的健康女性而言,是什么影响了她们对分娩地点的偏好、选择和决策?一项采用“最佳匹配”框架方法的定性证据综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1279-7.
9
Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村和偏远地区的助产护理:一项对2003年至2008年有助产士参与护理的农村产妇围产期结局的回顾性队列研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12137.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.女性在妊娠和分娩护理方面的决策和知情选择体验:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6.
2
Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.旨在更好地理解母婴保健中的风险选择:系统范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 8;15(6):e0234252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234252. eCollection 2020.
3
Access and outcomes of general practitioner obstetrician (rural generalist)-supported birthing units in Queensland.
昆士兰州由全科产科医生(乡村全科医生)支持的分娩单位的可及性与产出情况。
Aust J Rural Health. 2020 Feb;28(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12593. Epub 2020 Jan 5.