Peris Tara S, Rozenman Michelle, Bergman R Lindsey, Chang Susanna, O'Neill Joseph, Piacentini John
UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, USA.
UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Oct;93:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 5.
To date, few studies of childhood obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) have been adequately powered to examine patterns and predictors of comorbidity, despite the frequency with which it occurs. We address this gap, drawing on a large sample of youth with OCD who were systematically assessed through research and clinical programs in a university-based specialty program for children and adolescents with OCD. We examine patterns of comorbidity across different epochs of development and predict specific classes of OCD (comorbidity internalizing/externalizing/both) from key demographic and clinical variables that may be useful in guiding individualized treatment.
A total of 322 youths (mean age = 12.28, 53% male) were assessed using the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS; Silverman and Albano, 1996), the Children's Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CYBOCS; Scahill et al., 1997) and other standardized measures.
Consistent with prior research, 50% of youth met criteria for a co-occurring anxiety or depressive disorder. Rates of externalizing disorders were lower (16%). Developmental differences emerged such that older youth met criteria for a higher number of co-occurring disorders. As expected, adolescents in particular were more likely to have a co-occurring internalizing disorder compared to early or pre-adolescent peers. Surprisingly, they were also more likely to have a comorbid externalizing disorder. Developmental trends were particularly striking with respect to depression, with adolescents with OCD demonstrating a six-fold greater likelihood of co-occurring depressive disorder compared to younger counterparts.
Clinical implications are discussed with eye toward tailoring interventions, particularly during the transition to adolescence when youth are at heightened risk for depression.
尽管儿童强迫症(OCD)共病现象频繁出现,但迄今为止,很少有关于儿童强迫症的研究有足够的样本量来检验共病模式及预测因素。我们利用一个大型的强迫症青年样本填补这一空白,这些青年通过一个以大学为基础的针对儿童和青少年强迫症的专业项目中的研究和临床项目进行了系统评估。我们研究不同发育阶段的共病模式,并从可能有助于指导个体化治疗的关键人口统计学和临床变量中预测特定类型的强迫症(共病内化/外化/两者皆有)。
使用焦虑障碍访谈量表(ADIS;Silverman和Albano,1996)、儿童耶鲁布朗强迫症量表(CYBOCS;Scahill等人,1997)及其他标准化测量工具对总共322名青年(平均年龄 = 12.28岁,53%为男性)进行评估。
与先前研究一致,50%的青年符合共病焦虑或抑郁障碍的标准。外化障碍的发生率较低(16%)。出现了发育差异,年龄较大的青年符合更多共病障碍的标准。正如预期的那样,与早期或青春期前的同龄人相比,青少年尤其更有可能患有共病内化障碍。令人惊讶的是,他们也更有可能患有共病外化障碍。抑郁方面的发育趋势尤为显著,患有强迫症的青少年出现共病抑郁障碍的可能性是年龄较小者的六倍。
讨论了临床意义,着眼于调整干预措施,特别是在向青春期过渡期间,此时青少年患抑郁症的风险较高。