Tu H, Sun P, Gu H F, Zhang X K, Huang H, Wan T, Liu J H
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;43(9):1768-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 31.
To determine the clinical significance and prognostic value of femoral lymph node metastasis (FLNM) in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III vulvar carcinoma.
The medical records of patients with vulvar carcinoma who underwent inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy between 1990 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.
Of 66 patients with stage III vulvar carcinoma, 42 had superficial lymph node metastasis (SLNM) only and 24 had FLNM. Significantly higher rates of extracapsular invasion (P = 0.008), multiple nodal metastasis (P = 0.042), and advanced FIGO substage (P = 0.026) as well as a larger tumor diameter (≥4 cm, P = 0.023) and greater depth of invasion (≥5 mm, P = 0.020) were observed among patients with FLNM compared to those with SLNM only. After a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 6-172 months), 35 patients experienced relapse and 30 died from disease. The 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 70.1% and 30.8% for patients with SLNM only and FLNM, respectively (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only FLNM was found to be an independent risk factor for reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) and CSS among patients with stage III vulvar cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.277, P = 0.037 for RFS; HR = 2.360, P = 0.042 for CSS). When the FLNM cases were considered together as stage IIIC, significant differences emerged in the RFS (P = 0.002) and CSS (P = 0.004) among the re-divided FIGO substages.
FLNM represented an unfavorable status of node metastasis with a worse prognosis compared to that of SLNM alone, and this should be considered in a future FIGO staging system for vulvar cancer.
确定国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)III期外阴癌患者股淋巴结转移(FLNM)的临床意义及预后价值。
回顾性分析1990年至2013年间接受腹股沟股淋巴结清扫术的外阴癌患者的病历。
66例III期外阴癌患者中,42例仅有浅表淋巴结转移(SLNM),24例有FLNM。与仅有SLNM的患者相比,FLNM患者的包膜外侵犯率(P = 0.008)、多灶性淋巴结转移率(P = 0.042)、较高的FIGO分期亚组(P = 0.026)以及更大的肿瘤直径(≥4 cm,P = 0.023)和更深的浸润深度(≥5 mm,P = 0.020)均显著更高。中位随访46个月(范围6 - 172个月)后,35例患者复发,30例死于疾病。仅有SLNM和FLNM的患者5年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)分别为70.1%和30.8%(P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,在III期外阴癌患者中,只有FLNM是无复发生存期(RFS)和CSS降低的独立危险因素(RFS的风险比[HR] = 2.277,P = 0.037;CSS的HR = 2.360,P = 0.042)。当将FLNM病例合并视为IIIC期时,重新划分的FIGO分期亚组之间的RFS(P = 0.002)和CSS(P = 0.004)出现显著差异。
与单独的SLNM相比,FLNM代表淋巴结转移的不良状态,预后更差,这一点应在未来的FIGO外阴癌分期系统中予以考虑。