1 Australian Catholic University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
2 Calvary Public Hospital Bruce, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):581-588. doi: 10.1177/0269216317712849. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Face-to-face/group education for palliative caregivers is successful, but relies on caregivers travelling, being absent from the patient, and rigid timings. This presents inequities for those in rural locations.
To design and test an innovative distance-learning educational package (PrECEPt: PalliativE Caregivers Education Package).
Single-arm mixed-method feasibility proof-of-concept trial (ACTRN12616000601437). The primary outcome was carer self-efficacy, with secondary outcomes focused on caregiver preparedness and carer tasks/needs. Analysis focused on three outcome measures (taken at baseline and 6 weeks) and feasibility/acceptability qualitative data.
A single specialist palliative care service. Eligible informal caregivers were those of patients registered with the outpatient or community service, where the patient had a prognosis of ⩾12 weeks, supporting someone with nutrition/hydration and/or pain management needs, proficient in English and no major mental health diagnosis.
Two modules were developed and tested (nutrition/hydration and pain management) with 18 caregivers. The materials did not have a statistically significant impact on carer self-efficacy. However, statistically significant improvements were observed on the two subsidiary measures of (1) caregiving tasks, consequences and needs ( p = 0.03, confidence interval: 0.72, 9.4) and (2) caregiver preparedness ( p = 0.001, confidence interval: -1.22, -0.46). The study determined that distance learning is acceptable and feasible for both caregivers and healthcare professionals.
Distance education improves caregiver preparedness and is a feasible and acceptable approach. A two-arm trial would determine whether the materials benefitted caregivers and patients compared to a control group not receiving the materials. Additional modules could be fruitfully developed and offered.
面对面/小组姑息治疗护理人员教育是成功的,但依赖于护理人员旅行、离开患者以及严格的时间安排。这对农村地区的人来说存在不公平。
设计并测试一种创新的远程学习教育包(PrECEPt:姑息治疗护理人员教育包)。
单臂混合方法可行性概念验证试验(ACTRN12616000601437)。主要结果是护理人员自我效能,次要结果侧重于护理人员的准备情况和护理人员的任务/需求。分析集中在三个结果测量(在基线和 6 周时进行)和可行性/可接受性定性数据上。
一个单一的专科姑息治疗服务。合格的非正式护理人员是那些为门诊或社区服务登记的患者的护理人员,这些患者的预后为 ⩾12 周,为有营养/水合和/或疼痛管理需求的人提供支持,熟练掌握英语且没有重大心理健康诊断。
开发并测试了两个模块(营养/水合和疼痛管理),有 18 名护理人员参加。这些材料对护理人员的自我效能没有统计学上的显著影响。然而,在两个次要指标上观察到了统计学上的显著改善:(1)护理任务、后果和需求( p = 0.03,置信区间:0.72,9.4)和(2)护理人员的准备情况( p = 0.001,置信区间:-1.22,-0.46)。该研究确定远程学习对护理人员和医疗保健专业人员来说是可接受和可行的。
远程教育提高了护理人员的准备情况,是一种可行且可接受的方法。一项双臂试验将确定与未接受材料的对照组相比,这些材料是否使护理人员和患者受益。可以开发和提供更多的附加模块。