Marfortt Daniel A, Josviack Dario, Lozano Alejandro, Cuestas Eduardo, Agüero Luis, Castro-Rodriguez Jose A
a Institute of Child Respiratory Medicine , Rafaela , Santa Fe , Argentina.
b Division of Allergy and Inmunology , Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Universidad Católica de Cordoba , Cordoba , Argentina.
J Asthma. 2018 May;55(5):470-476. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1339800. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Previous studies have provided conflicting results about how living in a rural or urban environment influences schoolchildren with asthma and allergic diseases in different ways. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if recurrent wheezing preschoolers from rural or urban areas differ in asthma, allergic diseases, and atopy.
A cross-sectional-study in Rafaela, Argentina, on 143 preschoolers with recurrent wheezing from rural and urban settings was performed (2010-2012). Diagnosis of asthma (by positive asthma predictive index [API]), allergic diseases (rhinitis, dermatitis), and atopy (by skin prick test [SPT], peripheral blood eosinophils, and serum total IgE) were assessed.
Preschoolers from rural settings had significantly higher prevalence of vaginal delivery, longer breastfeeding, earlier onset of wheezing, more parental smoking, siblings, shared a bedroom, and more exposure to chemicals used in plant fumigation or farm animals, and unpasteurized milk consumption, in comparison to preschoolers living in urban setting. In contrast, preschoolers from urban areas had significantly higher prevalence of parental history of allergy, positive skin prick test, and positive API. After multivariate analysis adjusting for covariates, maternal smoking [odds ratio (OR) = 3.44] and positive SPT (OR = 5.57) significantly increase the risk of asthma diagnosis (positive API); in contrast, living in rural setting (OR = 0.04), and having more siblings (OR = 0.51) decrease their risk.
Recurrent wheezing preschoolers from rural areas had a significant inverse odds of being diagnosed with asthma (type-2 inflammation) when compared to those from urban areas. Exposure to farm animals and consumption of unpasteurized milk might have a role.
以往研究对于生活在农村或城市环境如何以不同方式影响患哮喘和过敏性疾病的学龄儿童给出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是评估来自农村或城市地区的反复喘息学龄前儿童在哮喘、过敏性疾病和特应性方面是否存在差异。
在阿根廷拉费拉进行了一项横断面研究,研究对象为143名来自农村和城市地区的反复喘息学龄前儿童(2010 - 2012年)。评估哮喘诊断(通过阳性哮喘预测指数[API])、过敏性疾病(鼻炎、皮炎)和特应性(通过皮肤点刺试验[SPT]、外周血嗜酸性粒细胞和血清总IgE)。
与城市学龄前儿童相比,农村学龄前儿童的顺产率、母乳喂养时间更长、喘息发作更早、父母吸烟更多、有兄弟姐妹、共用卧室、接触植物熏蒸或农场动物使用的化学品以及饮用生牛奶的情况更为普遍。相比之下,城市学龄前儿童的父母过敏史、皮肤点刺试验阳性和API阳性的患病率显著更高。在对协变量进行多变量分析调整后,母亲吸烟[比值比(OR)= 3.44]和SPT阳性(OR = 5.57)显著增加哮喘诊断(阳性API)的风险;相比之下,生活在农村地区(OR = 0.04)和有更多兄弟姐妹(OR = 0.51)会降低他们的风险。
与城市地区的反复喘息学龄前儿童相比,农村地区的反复喘息学龄前儿童被诊断为哮喘(2型炎症)的几率显著较低。接触农场动物和饮用生牛奶可能起到了一定作用。