• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年烧伤患者短期和长期死亡率增加:一项全国性纵向队列研究。

Short-term and long-term increased mortality in elderly patients with burn injury: a national longitudinal cohort study.

机构信息

Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03669-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03669-1
PMID:36650431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9843907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The population of elderly patients with burn injuries is growing. Insight into long-term mortality rates of elderly after burn injury and predictors affecting outcome is limited. This study aimed to provide this information.

METHODS

A multicentre observational retrospective cohort study was conducted in all three Dutch burn centres. Patients aged ≥65 years, admitted with burn injuries between 2009 and 2018, were included. Data were retrieved from electronic patient records and the Dutch Burn Repository R3. Mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess predictors for in-hospital mortality and mortality after discharge at 1 year and five-year. Survival analysis was used to assess predictors of five-year mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 682/771 admitted patients were discharged. One-year and five-year mortality rates were 8.1 and 23.4%. The SMRs were 1.9(95%CI 1.5-2.5) and 1.4(95%CI 1.2-1.6), respectively. The SMRs were highest in patients aged 75-80 years at 1 year (SMRs 2.7, 95%CI 1.82-3.87) and five-year in patients aged 65-74 years (SMRs 10.1, 95%CI 7.7-13.0). Independent predictors for mortality at 1 year after discharge were higher age (OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1), severe comorbidity, (ASA-score ≥ 3) (OR 4.8, 95%CI 2.3-9.7), and a non-home discharge location (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.1-3.8). The relative risk of dying up to five-year was increased by age (HR 1.1, 95%CI 1.0-1.1), severe comorbidity (HR 2.3, 95%CI 1.6-3.5), and non-home discharge location (HR 2.1, 95%CI 1.4-3.2).

CONCLUSION

Long-term mortality until five-year after burn injury was higher than the age and sex-matched general Dutch population, and predicted by higher age, severe comorbidity, and a non-home discharge destination. Next to pre-injury characteristics, potential long-lasting systemic consequences on biological mechanisms following burn injuries probably play a role in increased mortality. Decreased health status makes patients more prone to burn injuries, leading to early death.

摘要

背景

老年烧伤患者的人数不断增加。对于烧伤后老年患者的长期死亡率以及影响预后的预测因素,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在提供相关信息。

方法

对荷兰三家烧伤中心的所有 65 岁及以上的烧伤患者进行了一项多中心观察性回顾性队列研究。收集患者从电子病历和荷兰烧伤资料库 R3 中提取的数据。计算死亡率和标准化死亡率比(SMR)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估院内死亡率以及出院后 1 年和 5 年的死亡率的预测因素。生存分析用于评估 5 年死亡率的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 771 例患者,其中 682 例出院。1 年和 5 年的死亡率分别为 8.1%和 23.4%。SMR 分别为 1.9(95%CI 1.5-2.5)和 1.4(95%CI 1.2-1.6)。75-80 岁患者的 1 年 SMR 最高(SMR 2.7,95%CI 1.82-3.87),65-74 岁患者的 5 年 SMR 最高(SMR 10.1,95%CI 7.7-13.0)。出院后 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素包括年龄较大(OR 1.1,95%CI 1.0-1.1)、严重合并症(ASA 评分≥3)(OR 4.8,95%CI 2.3-9.7)和非家庭出院地点(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.1-3.8)。直至 5 年的死亡相对风险随着年龄(HR 1.1,95%CI 1.0-1.1)、严重合并症(HR 2.3,95%CI 1.6-3.5)和非家庭出院地点(HR 2.1,95%CI 1.4-3.2)的增加而增加。

结论

烧伤后 5 年的长期死亡率高于年龄和性别匹配的荷兰一般人群,且与较高的年龄、严重的合并症和非家庭出院地点有关。除了受伤前的特征外,烧伤后对生物机制的潜在长期系统性影响可能是导致死亡率增加的原因。健康状况的下降使患者更容易受到烧伤的影响,从而导致早期死亡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a6/9843907/7a03ec5e7588/12877_2022_3669_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a6/9843907/2502c1031cb8/12877_2022_3669_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a6/9843907/7a03ec5e7588/12877_2022_3669_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a6/9843907/2502c1031cb8/12877_2022_3669_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25a6/9843907/7a03ec5e7588/12877_2022_3669_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Short-term and long-term increased mortality in elderly patients with burn injury: a national longitudinal cohort study.老年烧伤患者短期和长期死亡率增加:一项全国性纵向队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03669-1.
2
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Predictors of Discharge Disposition in Older Adults With Burns: A Study of the Burn Model Systems.老年烧伤患者出院处置的预测因素:烧伤模型系统研究
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):607-12. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000216.
4
Burns and long-term infectious disease morbidity: A population-based study.烧伤与长期传染病发病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Burns. 2017 Mar;43(2):273-281. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
Reliability and validity of a frailty assessment tool in specialized burn care, a retrospective multicentre cohort study.一种专门的烧伤护理中衰弱评估工具的可靠性和有效性:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Burns. 2023 Nov;49(7):1621-1631. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 5.
6
Long-term functional outcomes in the elderly after burn injury.老年烧伤患者的长期功能预后
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):497-503. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31825aeaac.
7
Understanding the long-term impacts of burn on the cardiovascular system.了解烧伤对心血管系统的长期影响。
Burns. 2016 Mar;42(2):366-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.020. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Increased admissions for diabetes mellitus after burn.烧伤后糖尿病入院人数增加。
Burns. 2016 Dec;42(8):1734-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
9
Burn induced nervous system morbidity among burn and non-burn trauma patients compared with non-injured people.烧伤和非烧伤创伤患者与未受伤人群相比,烧伤引起的神经系统发病率。
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1041-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.06.006. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Frailty score on admission predicts outcomes in elderly burn injury.入院时的衰弱评分可预测老年烧伤患者的预后。
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000190.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potential Use of Fibrin Sealants in Burn Wound Management: A Comprehensive Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies.纤维蛋白密封剂在烧伤创面处理中的潜在应用:实验与临床研究的全面综述
Eur Burn J. 2025 Jun 5;6(2):32. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020032.
2
Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Survival in Elderly Burn Patients Aged 65 and Older: A Retrospective Analysis in an Appalachian Cohort.65岁及以上老年烧伤患者生存的临床和人口统计学预测因素:阿巴拉契亚队列的回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):e82283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82283. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Impact of Total Body Surface Area Burn Injuries on Clinical Outcomes and Comorbidities in Elderly Patients Aged Over 65.

本文引用的文献

1
Compounded Cerium Nitrate-Silver Sulfadiazine Cream is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Burn Wounds: A Burn Center's 4-Year Experience.复方硝酸铈-磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗烧伤创面安全有效:烧伤中心 4 年的经验。
J Burn Care Res. 2022 May 17;43(3):716-721. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab180.
2
Long-term survival among elderly after burns compared with national mean remaining life expectancy.烧伤老年患者的长期生存率与全国平均剩余预期寿命的比较。
Burns. 2021 Sep;47(6):1252-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 May 30.
3
Early mobility after fragility hip fracture: a mixed methods embedded case study.
65岁以上老年患者全身表面积烧伤对临床结局和合并症的影响
Cureus. 2024 Dec 23;16(12):e76253. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76253. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
The timing of death in burn patients.烧伤患者的死亡时间。
Acute Med Surg. 2024 Jun 27;11(1):e970. doi: 10.1002/ams2.970. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.老年急性烧伤患者老年关怀护理包的实施。
Burns. 2024 May;50(4):841-849. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.02.022. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Factors Predicting 90-Day Readmissions for US Older Adult Burn Patients From the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database.预测美国老年烧伤患者 90 天再入院的因素:来自 2016-2018 年全国再入院数据库的分析。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 May 6;45(3):709-718. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae020.
7
The effectiveness of the psychosocial empowerment program in early adjustment among adult burn survivors.心理社会赋权项目对成年烧伤幸存者早期适应的有效性。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 16;23(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01700-x.
脆性髋部骨折后早期活动:一项混合方法嵌入式案例研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02083-3.
4
Undernutrition, Sarcopenia, and Frailty in Fragility Hip Fracture: Advanced Strategies for Improving Clinical Outcomes.衰弱性髋部骨折患者的营养不良、肌肉减少症和衰弱:改善临床结局的先进策略。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 4;12(12):3743. doi: 10.3390/nu12123743.
5
Burns in the elderly: a nationwide study on management and clinical outcomes.老年人烧伤:一项关于治疗与临床结局的全国性研究。
Burns Trauma. 2020 Oct 22;8:tkaa027. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa027. eCollection 2020.
6
Frailty screening in hospitalised older adults: How does the brief Dutch National Safety Management Program perform compared to a more extensive approach?衰弱筛查在住院老年患者中的应用:与更广泛的方法相比,简要的荷兰国家安全管理方案表现如何?
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1064-1073. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15148. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
Management of Burns.烧伤的管理
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 19;381(12):1188-1189. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1909342.
8
Trends and risk factors for mortality in elderly burns patients: A retrospective review.老年烧伤患者死亡率的趋势和危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Burns. 2019 Sep;45(6):1342-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
The frailty tipping point: Determining which patients are targets for intervention in a burn population.脆弱 tipping 点:确定烧伤人群中哪些患者是干预的目标。
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.003. Epub 2019 May 10.
10
Development of the Burn Frailty Index: A prognostication index for elderly patients sustaining burn injuries.烧伤虚弱指数的制定:一种预测老年烧伤患者预后的指标。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 14.