• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing clinical correlates of self-rated disability in patients with multiple sclerosis.评估多发性硬化症患者自评残疾的临床相关因素。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2015 Jul 8;1:2055217315592425. doi: 10.1177/2055217315592425. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
2
A multidimensional assessment of multiple sclerosis: relationships between disability domains.多发性硬化症的多维评估:残疾领域之间的关系
Acta Neurol Scand. 1999 Sep;100(3):156-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1999.tb00731.x.
3
Social participation of patients with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者的社会参与
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Apr;29(4):469-473. doi: 10.17219/acem/115237.
4
A preliminary validation of the brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS) tool in an Irish population with multiple sclerosis (MS).多发性硬化症简短国际认知评估工具(BICAMS)在爱尔兰多发性硬化症(MS)患者群体中的初步验证。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Nov;4(6):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
5
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 可预测脑卒中患者的住院情况。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):856-862. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04615-9. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
7
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)在多发性硬化症患者中的效度验证。
Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):448-56. doi: 10.1177/1352458514543732. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
[Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls].[世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在土耳其精神病患者和健康对照人群中的效度与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018 Winter;29(4):248-257.
9
Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.验证 36 项和 12 项自我报告世界卫生组织残疾评估表第二版(WHODAS-II)在自闭症谱系障碍个体中的适用性。
Autism Res. 2019 Jul;12(7):1101-1111. doi: 10.1002/aur.2115. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Clinical correlates of quality of life in systemic sclerosis measured with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表II评估的系统性硬化症患者生活质量的临床相关因素
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb 15;59(2):279-84. doi: 10.1002/art.23344.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile-phone-based e-diary derived patient reported outcomes: Association with clinical disease activity, psychological status and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis.基于移动电话的电子日记得出的患者报告结局:与多发性硬化症患者的临床疾病活动、心理状态和生活质量的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0250647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250647. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)在多发性硬化症患者中的效度验证。
Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):448-56. doi: 10.1177/1352458514543732. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
2
Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者自我确定疾病阶段(PDDS)量表评分的验证
BMC Neurol. 2013 Apr 25;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37.
3
Measuring the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: a necessary challenge.在临床实践中测量多发性硬化症患者的生活质量:一项必要的挑战。
Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:524894. doi: 10.1155/2013/524894. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
4
Relevance of quality of life assessment for multiple sclerosis patients with memory impairment.多发性硬化症伴记忆障碍患者生活质量评估的相关性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050056. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
5
The applicability of WHODAS 2.0 in adolescents in China.WHODAS 2.0 在我国青少年中的适用性。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Sep;21(17-18):2438-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04126.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
6
A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED.从PROC MIXED计算局部效应量指标科恩f(2)的实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111. eCollection 2012.
7
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.多发性硬化症的诊断标准:2010 年麦克唐纳标准修订版。
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302. doi: 10.1002/ana.22366.
8
Actual reality: a new approach to functional assessment in persons with multiple sclerosis.实际情况:多发性硬化症患者功能评估的新方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.022.
9
Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis.验证世界卫生组织残疾评估表 II(WHODAS-II)在骨关节炎患者中的应用。
Rheumatol Int. 2011 Mar;31(3):339-46. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1306-8. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
10
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版:对意大利语版验证的贡献
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802240498.

评估多发性硬化症患者自评残疾的临床相关因素。

Assessing clinical correlates of self-rated disability in patients with multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Magistrale Giuseppe, Medori Rossella, Cadavid Diego, Argento Ornella, Incerti Chiara, Pisani Valerio, Caltagirone Carlo, Bozzali Marco, DeLuca John, Nocentini Ugo

机构信息

Neurology and NeuroRehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Italy.

Neurology Clinical Development Group, Biogen, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2015 Jul 8;1:2055217315592425. doi: 10.1177/2055217315592425. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2055217315592425
PMID:28607696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5433396/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with significant impairment.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to identify and compare clinical measures that can predict self-rated disability in patients with MS using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II).

METHODS

Patients with MS and healthy controls were consecutively recruited at one center. Patients were evaluated for cognitive function assessment, neurological status, perceived disability, mood, fatigue and disease duration. Controls underwent neuropsychological evaluation only. Data were analyzed using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

WHODAS-II total score was predicted by fatigue ( < 0.001) and neurological status ( < 0.05). Student's test comparisons between published WHODAS-II normative data and the enrolled cohort of patients with MS showed significantly worse ( < 0.05) scores for patients on mobility, self-care, life activities, participation and total score domains, but not in cognition. Group differences between patients with MS ( = 61) and controls ( = 61) were significant in all cognitive measures except one verbal memory test subscale. Memory function correlated best with the social participation domain of the WHODAS-II.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported disability in patients with MS was most strongly influenced by fatigue and to a lesser extent by physical disability. Although cognitive function does affect self-assessment of disability, this is not captured by patients on the WHODAS-II cognitive domain.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)与严重功能障碍相关。

目的

本文旨在识别并比较使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS-II)来预测MS患者自评残疾程度的临床指标。

方法

在一个中心连续招募MS患者和健康对照。对患者进行认知功能评估、神经状态、感知到的残疾程度、情绪、疲劳及病程评估。对照仅接受神经心理学评估。采用多元回归分析数据。

结果

疲劳(<0.001)和神经状态(<0.05)可预测WHODAS-II总分。已发表的WHODAS-II常模数据与入组的MS患者队列之间的学生t检验比较显示,患者在活动能力、自我照料、生活活动、参与度和总分领域的得分显著更差(<0.05),但在认知领域并非如此。除一项言语记忆测试子量表外,MS患者(n = 61)与对照(n = 61)在所有认知测量指标上的组间差异均显著。记忆功能与WHODAS-II的社会参与领域相关性最佳。

结论

MS患者的自评残疾程度受疲劳影响最大,身体残疾的影响较小。虽然认知功能确实会影响残疾自评,但WHODAS-II认知领域未体现这一点。