Azabou Eric, Rohaut Benjamin, Heming Nicholas, Magalhaes Eric, Morizot-Koutlidis Régine, Kandelman Stanislas, Allary Jeremy, Moneger Guy, Polito Andrea, Maxime Virginie, Annane Djillali, Lofaso Frederic, Chrétien Fabrice, Mantz Jean, Porcher Raphael, Sharshar Tarek
Department of Physiology - Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Raymond-Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U 1179, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Garches, France.
General Intensive Care Unit - Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Raymond-Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U 1173, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Garches, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0290-5. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Somatosensory (SSEP) and brainstem auditory (BAEP) evoked potentials are neurophysiological tools which, respectively, explore the intracranial conduction time (ICCT) and the intrapontine conduction time (IPCT). The prognostic values of prolonged cerebral conduction times in deeply sedated patients have never been assessed. Sedated patients are at risk of developing new neurological complications, undetected. In this prospective observational bi-center pilot study, we investigated whether early impairment of SSEP's ICCT and/or BAEP's IPCT could predict in-ICU mortality or altered mental status (AMS), in deeply sedated critically ill patients.
SSEP by stimulation of the median nerve and BAEP were assessed in critically ill patients receiving deep sedation on day 3 following ICU admission. Deep sedation was defined by a Richmond Assessment sedation Scale (RASS) <-3. Mean left- and right-side ICCT and IPCT were measured for each patient. Primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively, in-ICU mortality and AMS defined as the occurrence of delirium and/or delayed awakening after discontinuation of sedation.
Eighty-six patients were studied of which 49 (57%) were non-brain-injured and 37 (43%) were brain-injured. Impaired ICCT was a predictor of in-ICU mortality after adjustment on the global Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA) [OR (95% CI) = 2.69 (1.05-6.85); p = 0.039] and on the non-neurological SOFA components [2.67 (1.05-6.81); p = 0.040]. IPCT was more frequently delayed in the subgroup of patients who developed post-sedation AMS (24%) compared those without AMS (0%). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053). Impairment rates of ICCT and IPCT were not found to be significantly different between non-brain- and brain-injured subgroups of patients.
In critically ill patients receiving deep sedation, early ICCT impairment was associated with mortality. Somatosensory and brainstem auditory evoked potentials may be useful early warning indicators of brain dysfunction as well as prognostic markers in deeply sedated critically ill patients.
体感诱发电位(SSEP)和脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)是神经生理学工具,分别用于探究颅内传导时间(ICCT)和脑桥内传导时间(IPCT)。深度镇静患者脑传导时间延长的预后价值从未得到评估。镇静患者有发生未被发现的新的神经并发症的风险。在这项前瞻性观察性双中心试点研究中,我们调查了SSEP的ICCT和/或BAEP的IPCT早期受损是否能预测深度镇静的危重症患者的重症监护病房(ICU)内死亡率或精神状态改变(AMS)。
在ICU入院后第3天,对接受深度镇静的危重症患者进行正中神经刺激的SSEP和BAEP评估。深度镇静定义为里士满镇静评估量表(RASS)<-3。测量每位患者的平均左侧和右侧ICCT及IPCT。主要和次要结局分别为ICU内死亡率和定义为停用镇静后谵妄和/或苏醒延迟的AMS。
研究了86例患者,其中49例(57%)无脑损伤,37例(43%)有脑损伤。在对全球序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分进行校正后,ICCT受损是ICU内死亡率的预测因素[比值比(95%置信区间)=2.69(1.05-6.85);P=0.039],在对非神经学SOFA组分进行校正后也是如此[2.67(1.05-6.81);P=0.040]。与未发生AMS的患者(0%)相比,发生镇静后AMS的患者亚组中IPCT延迟更为常见(24%)。然而,这种差异未达到统计学意义(P=0.053)。在无脑损伤和有脑损伤的患者亚组中,未发现ICCT和IPCT的受损率有显著差异。
在接受深度镇静的危重症患者中,早期ICCT受损与死亡率相关。体感诱发电位和脑干听觉诱发电位可能是脑功能障碍的有用早期预警指标以及深度镇静危重症患者的预后标志物。