• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRASS 在镇静危重症患者中的应用是一个可预测的死亡因素:BRASS-ICU。

Use of BRASS in sedated critically-ill patients as a predictable mortality factor: BRASS-ICU.

机构信息

Surgical and Trauma Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Reims, Reims Cedex, France.

University of Médecine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims Cedex, France.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2021 Apr;43(4):283-290. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1849901. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1080/01616412.2020.1849901
PMID:33208055
Abstract

: To demonstrate that a BRASS score≥ 3 at admission of intubated, ventilated and sedated patients is predictive of mortality: we have realized an Observational prospective multicenter study.All Major patients without neurological history, admitted to ICU for a non-neurological cause, sedated and admitted under mechanical ventilation were included.: One hundred and ten patients were included, the BRASS score as well as the FOUR and RASS scores were collected.At day 28, patients with a BRASS score ≥ 3 had an excess mortality (OR 3.29 - CI 95% [1.42-7.63], p = 0.005) as well as day 90 (OR 2.65 - CI 95% [1.19-5.88], p = 0.02), without impact on the delirium measured by CAM-ICU (OR 1.8 - CI 95% [0.68-4.77], p = 0.023). After adjustment with SAPS II, FOUR and RASS, difference in mortality was not any more different.It is also noted that patients with BRASS ≥ 3 are more sedated (RASS: -5 [-5 - -5] vs -4 [-5 - -3], p < 0.0001) and more comatose (FOUR: 2 [1-4] vs 6 [4-9], p < 0.0001), and have higher doses of midazolam (10 mg/h [5-15] vs 7.5 mg/h [5-10], p = 0.02) and sufentanil (20 μg/h [15-22.5] vs 10 [10-12.5], p = 0.01).: The early alteration of brainstem reflexes measured by the BRASS score was not independently predictable in terms of mortality in the non-neurological ICU patients, admitted under sedation and mechanical ventilation.: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03835091,, .

摘要

: 为了证明入院时接受插管、通气和镇静治疗的患者的 BRASS 评分≥3 与死亡率相关:我们进行了一项观察性前瞻性多中心研究。所有无神经病史、因非神经原因入住 ICU、接受镇静治疗并接受机械通气的主要患者均被纳入研究。: 共纳入 110 例患者,收集 BRASS 评分以及 FOUR 和 RASS 评分。第 28 天,BRASS 评分≥3 的患者死亡率过高(OR 3.29-95%CI [1.42-7.63],p=0.005),第 90 天死亡率同样过高(OR 2.65-95%CI [1.19-5.88],p=0.02),但对 ICU 意识障碍评估(CAM-ICU)无影响(OR 1.8-95%CI [0.68-4.77],p=0.023)。在与 SAPS II、FOUR 和 RASS 调整后,死亡率差异不再显著。还注意到,BRASS 评分≥3 的患者镇静程度更高(RASS:-5[-5--5] 与-4[-5--3],p<0.0001),昏迷程度更高(FOUR:2[1-4] 与 6[4-9],p<0.0001),咪达唑仑剂量更高(10mg/h[5-15] 与 7.5mg/h[5-10],p=0.02)和舒芬太尼剂量更高(20μg/h[15-22.5] 与 10μg/h[10-12.5],p=0.01)。: 在接受镇静和机械通气治疗的非神经 ICU 患者中,BRASS 评分测量的脑干反射早期改变与死亡率无关,不能独立预测。: ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03835091,,。

相似文献

1
Use of BRASS in sedated critically-ill patients as a predictable mortality factor: BRASS-ICU.BRASS 在镇静危重症患者中的应用是一个可预测的死亡因素:BRASS-ICU。
Neurol Res. 2021 Apr;43(4):283-290. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1849901. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
2
Nonsedation or Light Sedation in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients.危重症、机械通气患者的非镇静或浅镇静。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 19;382(12):1103-1111. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1906759. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
3
Brainstem response patterns in deeply-sedated critically-ill patients predict 28-day mortality.深度镇静的重症患者的脑干反应模式可预测28天死亡率。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176012. eCollection 2017.
4
Early intensive care sedation predicts long-term mortality in ventilated critically ill patients.早期重症监护镇静预测机械通气危重症患者的长期死亡率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct 15;186(8):724-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0522OC. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于重症患者镇静的随机试验
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
6
Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial.右美托咪定与劳拉西泮镇静对机械通气患者急性脑功能障碍的影响:MENDS随机对照试验
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2644-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644.
7
Sedation depth and long-term mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study.机械通气危重症成人镇静深度与长期死亡率:一项前瞻性纵向多中心队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):910-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2830-2. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Enteral versus intravenous approach for the sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized and controlled trial.肠内与静脉途径用于危重症患者镇静:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2019 Jan 7;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2280-x.
9
Influence of Sedation Level and Ventilation Status on the Diagnostic Validity of Delirium Screening Tools in the ICU-An International, Prospective, Bi-Center Observational Study (IDeAS).镇静水平和通气状态对 ICU 中谵妄筛查工具诊断准确性的影响:一项国际、前瞻性、双中心观察研究(IDeAS)。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 13;56(8):411. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080411.
10
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia of ventilated critically ill patients with multiple trauma: a prospective randomized study.连续外周神经阻滞用于多发创伤合并机械通气危重症患者的镇痛:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Apr;42(2):101183. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101183. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Altered lower brainstem neurophysiological response is associated with mortality in deeply sedated critically ill patients.低位脑干神经生理反应改变与深度镇静的危重症患者的死亡率相关。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun;51(6):1050-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07945-7. Epub 2025 Jun 13.