Anderson David A, Grajales-Reyes Gary E, Satpathy Ansuman T, Vasquez Hueichucura Carlos E, Murphy Theresa L, Murphy Kenneth M
Department of Pathology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eur J Immunol. 2017 Aug;47(8):1317-1323. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747050. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Ciita was discovered for its role in regulating transcription of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) genes. Subsequently, CIITA was predicted to control many other genes based on reporter and ChIP-seq analysis but few such predictions have been verified in vivo using Ciita mice. Testing these predictions for classical dendritic cells (cDCs) has been particularly difficult, since Ciita mice lack MHCII expression required to identify cDCs. However, recent identification of the cDC-specific transcription factor Zbtb46 allows the identification of cDCs independently of MHCII expression. We crossed Zbtb46 mice onto the Ciita background and found that all cDC lineages developed in vivo in the absence of Ciita. We then compared the complete transcriptional profile of wild-type and Ciita cDCs to define the physiological footprint of CIITA for both immature and activated cDCs. We find that CIITA exerts a highly restricted control over only the MHCII, H2-DO and H2-DM genes, in DC1 and DC2 cDC subsets, but not over other proposed targets, including Ii. These findings emphasize the caveats needed in interpreting transcription factor binding sites identified by in-vitro reporter analysis, or by ChIP-seq, which may not necessarily indicate their functional activity in vivo.
Ciita因其在调节主要组织相容性复合体II类(MHCII)基因转录中的作用而被发现。随后,基于报告基因和染色质免疫沉淀测序(ChIP-seq)分析,预测CIITA可调控许多其他基因,但使用Ciita基因敲除小鼠在体内验证的此类预测却很少。对经典树突状细胞(cDCs)进行这些预测的测试尤其困难,因为Ciita基因敲除小鼠缺乏识别cDCs所需的MHCII表达。然而,最近对cDC特异性转录因子Zbtb46的鉴定使得能够独立于MHCII表达来鉴定cDCs。我们将Zbtb46基因敲除小鼠与Ciita基因敲除小鼠杂交,发现所有cDC谱系在没有Ciita的情况下都能在体内发育。然后,我们比较了野生型和Ciita基因敲除的cDCs的完整转录谱,以确定CIITA对未成熟和活化的cDCs的生理影响。我们发现,在DC1和DC2 cDC亚群中,CIITA仅对MHCII、H2-DO和H2-DM基因发挥高度受限的调控作用,而对其他包括Ii在内的假定靶标则无调控作用。这些发现强调了在解释通过体外报告基因分析或ChIP-seq鉴定的转录因子结合位点时需要注意的问题,因为这些位点不一定表明它们在体内的功能活性。