Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Immunity. 2020 Oct 13;53(4):759-774.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
Development and function of conventional dendritic cell (cDC) subsets, cDC1 and cDC2, depend on transcription factors (TFs) IRF8 and IRF4, respectively. Since IRF8 and IRF4 can each interact with TF BATF3 at AP1-IRF composite elements (AICEs) and with TF PU.1 at Ets-IRF composite elements (EICEs), it is unclear how these factors exert divergent actions. Here, we determined the basis for distinct effects of IRF8 and IRF4 in cDC development. Genes expressed commonly by cDC1 and cDC2 used EICE-dependent enhancers that were redundantly activated by low amounts of either IRF4 or IRF8. By contrast, cDC1-specific genes relied on AICE-dependent enhancers, which required high IRF concentrations, but were activated by either IRF4 or IRF8. IRF8 was specifically required only by a minority of cDC1-specific genes, such as Xcr1, which could distinguish between IRF8 and IRF4 DNA-binding domains. Thus, these results explain how BATF3-dependent Irf8 autoactivation underlies emergence of the cDC1-specific transcriptional program.
传统树突状细胞 (cDC) 亚群 cDC1 和 cDC2 的发育和功能分别依赖于转录因子 (TF) IRF8 和 IRF4。由于 IRF8 和 IRF4 均可与 TF BATF3 在 AP1-IRF 复合元件 (AICE) 和 TF PU.1 在 Ets-IRF 复合元件 (EICE) 上相互作用,因此尚不清楚这些因素如何发挥不同的作用。在这里,我们确定了 IRF8 和 IRF4 在 cDC 发育中产生不同影响的基础。cDC1 和 cDC2 共同表达的基因使用依赖于 EICE 的增强子,这些增强子可被低浓度的 IRF4 或 IRF8 冗余激活。相比之下,cDC1 特异性基因依赖于依赖于 AICE 的增强子,这些增强子需要高浓度的 IRF,但可被 IRF4 或 IRF8 激活。IRF8 仅特异性地需要少数 cDC1 特异性基因,例如 Xcr1,它可以区分 IRF8 和 IRF4 DNA 结合结构域。因此,这些结果解释了 BATF3 依赖性 Irf8 自身激活如何为 cDC1 特异性转录程序的出现提供基础。