Chaung Katrina, Duke William S, Oh Sun Jung, Behr Amanda, Waller Jennifer L, Daniel Jeannie, Terris David J
1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
2 Department of Medical Illustration, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(3):409-415. doi: 10.1177/0194599817711886. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Objectives To define characteristics that influence patient perceptions of thyroidectomy scar cosmesis. Study Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary endocrine surgery practice in an academic medical center. Subjects and Methods Institutional review board-approved trial in which 136 subjects were recruited from a population of patients being seen for either thyroid or sinus surgery and evaluated standardized photographs, superimposed with computer-generated thyroidectomy scars of varying lengths (2, 4, and 6 cm) and widths (1 and 2 mm), and graded their perception of the scars using the observer scar assessment scale (OSAS) domains of the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Results There were 69 subjects in the thyroid group and 67 in the nonthyroid group. Controlling for width, longer scars were perceived as worse than shorter scars; controlling for length, thicker scars were perceived as worse than thinner scars ( P < .01). Beyond 2 cm, thick scars were judged to be worse than thin scars, even when they were shorter. There was no difference in the mean overall OSAS scores between surgery, sex, or age groups. Nonwhites tended to judge scars as being worse than whites did ( P < .01). Conclusion As expected, patients of all demographics prefer shorter scars compared with longer scars and thinner scars over thick scars. Ethnic differences in scar perception were identified and deserve additional study. Surgeons should endeavor to perform thyroid surgery through the smallest incision that allows the operation to be performed safely to minimize the cosmetic impact of the operation.
确定影响患者对甲状腺切除术后瘢痕美观度认知的特征。
前瞻性队列研究。
一所学术医疗中心的三级内分泌外科诊所。
经机构审查委员会批准的试验,从甲状腺或鼻窦手术患者群体中招募136名受试者,让他们评估标准化照片,照片上叠加有计算机生成的不同长度(2厘米、4厘米和6厘米)和宽度(1毫米和2毫米)的甲状腺切除术后瘢痕,并使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表的观察者瘢痕评估量表(OSAS)领域对瘢痕的美观度进行评分。
甲状腺组有69名受试者,非甲状腺组有67名。在控制宽度的情况下,较长的瘢痕被认为比短瘢痕更差;在控制长度的情况下,较厚的瘢痕被认为比薄瘢痕更差(P < 0.01)。超过2厘米时,即使厚瘢痕较短,也被判定比薄瘢痕更差。手术、性别或年龄组之间的平均总体OSAS评分没有差异。非白人倾向于认为瘢痕比白人更差(P < 0.01)。
正如预期的那样,所有人口统计学特征的患者都更喜欢较短的瘢痕而非较长的瘢痕,更喜欢较薄的瘢痕而非较厚的瘢痕。已发现瘢痕认知方面的种族差异,值得进一步研究。外科医生应努力通过能安全进行手术的最小切口来实施甲状腺手术,以尽量减少手术对美观的影响。