Kim David M, Hong Heather, Lin Jerry Ching-Yi, Nevins Myron
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Jul/Aug;37(4):e234-e244. doi: 10.11607/prd.3305.
A preclinical trial was conducted to treat 54 mandibular critical-sized alveolar ridge defects in 27 canines. Each hemimandible was randomized to be treated with two different anorganic bovine bone grafts (group A = InterOss [SigmaGraft]; group B = Bio-Oss [Geistlich]) or negative control (group C = empty defect) followed by a 4-, 8-, or 12-week observation period. Microcomputed tomography, histology, histopathology, and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments. By all the parameters assessed in this study, the biocompatibility and healing of group A treated defects were indistinguishable from those in group B. Radiographic comparison of graft resorption and bony integration demonstrated similar mean scores for both treatment groups. Likewise, no statistical differences were observed between the two groups with respect to percent mineralized volume and density. When compared to the critical-sized empty controls, both treatment groups showed statistically greater amounts of bone present in the defect sites and appeared to help preserve the mesial and distal alveolar walls of the defect. Histomorphometry also supported the similarity in performance of both tested groups as no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to percent bone, percent residual implant, and percent bone marrow values. While not statistically different, on average group A had more than twice the mean amount of bone present at 8 and 12 weeks compared to group B. Overall, group A had a good biocompatibility response, similar to group B. Clinical studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
进行了一项临床前试验,以治疗27只犬的54处下颌临界大小牙槽嵴缺损。将每侧下颌骨随机分为两组,分别用两种不同的无机牛骨移植物治疗(A组 = InterOss [SigmaGraft];B组 = Bio-Oss [Geistlich])或作为阴性对照(C组 = 空白缺损),随后进行4周、8周或12周的观察期。采用微型计算机断层扫描、组织学、组织病理学和组织形态计量学分析来评估这些治疗方法的安全性和有效性。根据本研究评估的所有参数,A组治疗缺损的生物相容性和愈合情况与B组无明显差异。移植骨吸收和骨整合的影像学比较显示,两个治疗组的平均得分相似。同样,两组在矿化体积百分比和密度方面也未观察到统计学差异。与临界大小的空白对照组相比,两个治疗组在缺损部位的骨量在统计学上均显著增加,且似乎有助于保留缺损的近中和远中牙槽壁。组织形态计量学也支持两个试验组在性能上的相似性,因为在骨百分比、残余植入物百分比和骨髓百分比值方面未观察到统计学显著差异。虽然无统计学差异,但平均而言,A组在8周和12周时的骨量平均值是B组的两倍多。总体而言,A组具有良好的生物相容性反应,与B组相似。建议进行临床研究以证实这些发现。