• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于身体健康状况症状评估的网络应用:一项系统综述。

Web Use for Symptom Appraisal of Physical Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Mueller Julia, Jay Caroline, Harper Simon, Davies Alan, Vega Julio, Todd Chris

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 13;19(6):e202. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6755.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.6755
PMID:28611017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5487739/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Web has become an important information source for appraising symptoms. We need to understand the role it currently plays in help seeking and symptom evaluation to leverage its potential to support health care delivery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to systematically review the literature currently available on Web use for symptom appraisal.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for any empirical studies that addressed the use of the Web by lay people to evaluate symptoms for physical conditions. Articles were excluded if they did not meet minimum quality criteria. Study findings were synthesized using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

A total of 32 studies were included. Study designs included cross-sectional surveys, qualitative studies, experimental studies, and studies involving website/search engine usage data. Approximately 35% of adults engage in Web use for symptom appraisal, but this proportion varies between 23% and 75% depending on sociodemographic and disease-related factors. Most searches were symptom-based rather than condition-based. Users viewed only the top search results and interacted more with results that mentioned serious conditions. Web use for symptom appraisal appears to impact on the decision to present to health services, communication with health professionals, and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Web use for symptom appraisal has the potential to influence the timing of help seeking for symptoms and the communication between patients and health care professionals during consultations. However, studies lack suitable comparison groups as well as follow-up of participants over time to determine whether Web use results in health care utilization and diagnosis. Future research should involve longitudinal follow-up so that we can weigh the benefits of Web use for symptom appraisal (eg, reductions in delays to diagnosis) against the disadvantages (eg, unnecessary anxiety and health care use) and relate these to health care costs.

摘要

背景

网络已成为评估症状的重要信息来源。我们需要了解它目前在寻求帮助和症状评估中所起的作用,以充分利用其潜力来支持医疗服务的提供。

目的

旨在系统回顾目前关于网络用于症状评估的现有文献。

方法

我们在PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、ACM数字图书馆、SCOPUS和科学引文索引中搜索了任何关于外行人员使用网络评估身体状况症状的实证研究。不符合最低质量标准的文章被排除。研究结果采用主题分析法进行综合。

结果

共纳入32项研究。研究设计包括横断面调查、定性研究、实验研究以及涉及网站/搜索引擎使用数据的研究。约35%的成年人使用网络进行症状评估,但这一比例因社会人口统计学和疾病相关因素在23%至75%之间有所不同。大多数搜索是基于症状而非基于疾病的。用户仅查看搜索结果的前几项,并且与提及严重疾病的结果互动更多。使用网络进行症状评估似乎会影响寻求医疗服务的决定、与医疗专业人员的沟通以及焦虑情绪。

结论

使用网络进行症状评估有可能影响寻求症状帮助的时机以及患者与医疗专业人员在咨询过程中的沟通。然而,研究缺乏合适的对照组以及对参与者的长期随访,以确定网络使用是否会导致医疗服务利用和诊断。未来的研究应包括纵向随访,以便我们能够权衡使用网络进行症状评估的益处(如减少诊断延迟)与弊端(如不必要的焦虑和医疗服务使用),并将这些与医疗成本联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/5487739/448c94bb3414/jmir_v19i6e202_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/5487739/448c94bb3414/jmir_v19i6e202_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc52/5487739/448c94bb3414/jmir_v19i6e202_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Web Use for Symptom Appraisal of Physical Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.用于身体健康状况症状评估的网络应用:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 13;19(6):e202. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6755.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effectiveness and limitations of online health information tools in assessing the quality of medication-related content.评估在线健康信息工具在评估药物相关内容质量方面的有效性和局限性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 24;13:1460202. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460202. eCollection 2025.
2
Information Behaviour and Knowledge of Patients Before Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术前患者的信息行为与知识水平
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 17;17(2):300. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020300.
3
Enhancing Multilingual Patient Education: ChatGPT's Accuracy and Readability for SSNHL Queries in English and Spanish.

本文引用的文献

1
Are online symptoms checkers useful for patients with inflammatory arthritis?在线症状检查工具对炎性关节炎患者有用吗?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 24;17(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1189-2.
2
Characterizing the Processes for Navigating Internet Health Information Using Real-Time Observations: A Mixed-Methods Approach.利用实时观测来描述浏览互联网健康信息的过程:一种混合方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 20;17(7):e173. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3945.
3
Use of internet resources by patients awaiting gastroenterology consultation.
加强多语言患者教育:ChatGPT对英文和西班牙文突发性聋查询的准确性和可读性
OTO Open. 2024 Dec 11;8(4):e70048. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70048. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
4
Navigating the Lay Referral System for Treatment-Seeking Decisions During Illness in the Digital Age: A Qualitative Study of Adults Living in Slums in Nigeria.数字时代疾病期间寻求治疗决策的非专业转诊系统导航:对尼日利亚贫民窟成年人的定性研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Feb;47(2):e13863. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13863. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
5
Capabilities of ChatGPT-3.5 as a Urological Triage System.ChatGPT-3.5作为泌尿外科分诊系统的能力。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Nov 1;70:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.015. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Differences in Fear and Negativity Levels Between Formal and Informal Health-Related Websites: Analysis of Sentiments and Emotions.正式与非正式健康相关网站之间的恐惧和消极水平差异:情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 9;26:e55151. doi: 10.2196/55151.
7
Evaluating the diagnostic and triage performance of digital and online symptom checkers for the presentation of myocardial infarction; A retrospective cross-sectional study.评估数字和在线症状检查器对心肌梗死表现的诊断和分诊性能;一项回顾性横断面研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 5;3(8):e0000558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000558. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Enhancing Ophthalmic Triage: identification of new clinical features to support healthcare professionals in triage.增强眼科分诊能力:识别新的临床特征,以支持医护人员进行分诊。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Sep;38(13):2536-2544. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03070-9. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Otosclerosis online: a critical analysis of quality, reliability, readability and content of otosclerosis information.耳硬化症在线:耳硬化症信息质量、可靠性、可读性和内容的批判性分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):503-508. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08311-3. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
10
User Experience of Symptom Checkers: A Systematic Review.症状检查器的用户体验:系统评价。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023 Apr 29;2022:1198-1207. eCollection 2022.
等待胃肠病学咨询的患者对互联网资源的使用。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;26(1):49-52. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.6043.
4
Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey.使用互联网的老年人的健康信息寻求行为:一项调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 8;17(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3749.
5
Evaluating the process of online health information searching: a qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives.评估在线健康信息搜索过程:一种探索消费者观点的定性方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 7;16(10):e224. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3341.
6
Medical information seeking: impact on risk for anxiety psychopathology.寻求医疗信息:对焦虑心理病理学风险的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;45(3):402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Using the internet to seek information about genetic and rare diseases: a case study comparing data from 2006 and 2011.利用互联网查找有关遗传疾病和罕见病的信息:一项对比2006年和2011年数据的案例研究
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Feb 24;3(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2916.
8
When do patients with hand illness seek online health consultations and what do they ask?手部疾病患者何时会寻求在线健康咨询,他们会咨询哪些问题?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1246-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3461-9. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
9
Older adult experience of online diagnosis: results from a scenario-based think-aloud protocol.老年人的在线诊断体验:基于情景的有声思维协议的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 16;16(1):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2924.
10
Gynaecologic cancer symptom awareness, concern and care seeking among US women: a multi-site qualitative study.美国女性的妇科癌症症状意识、关注和护理寻求:一项多地点定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2013 Feb;30(1):96-104. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms040. Epub 2012 Sep 3.