• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危前列腺癌男性的决策过程:一项调查研究。

Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):325-332. doi: 10.1002/pon.4469. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1002/pon.4469
PMID:28612468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5849389/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize decision-making processes and outcomes among men expressing early-treatment preferences for low-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

We conducted telephone surveys of men newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer in 2012 to 2014. We analyzed subjects who had discussed prostate cancer treatment with a clinician and expressed a treatment preference. We asked about decision-making processes, including physician discussions, prostate-cancer knowledge, decision-making styles, treatment preference, and decisional conflict. We compared the responses across treatment groups with χ or ANOVA.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 761) had a median age of 62; 82% were white, 45% had a college education, and 35% had no comorbidities. Surveys were conducted at a median of 25 days (range 9-100) post diagnosis. Overall, 55% preferred active surveillance (AS), 26% preferred surgery, and 19% preferred radiotherapy. Participants reported routinely considering surgery, radiotherapy, and AS. Most were aware of their low-risk status (97%) and the option for AS (96%). However, men preferring active treatment (AT) were often unaware of treatment complications, including sexual dysfunction (23%) and urinary complications (41%). Most men (63%) wanted to make their own decision after considering the doctor's opinion, and about 90% reported being sufficiently involved in the treatment discussion. Men preferring AS had slightly more uncertainty about their decisions than those preferring AT.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects were actively engaged in decision making and considered a range of treatments. However, we found knowledge gaps about treatment complications among those preferring AT and slightly more decisional uncertainty among those preferring AS, suggesting the need for early decision support.

摘要

目的

描述表达对低危前列腺癌早期治疗偏好的男性的决策过程和结果。

方法

我们在 2012 年至 2014 年期间对新诊断为低危前列腺癌的男性进行了电话调查。我们分析了与临床医生讨论过前列腺癌治疗并表达了治疗偏好的受试者。我们询问了决策过程,包括医生讨论、前列腺癌知识、决策风格、治疗偏好和决策冲突。我们通过 χ 或 ANOVA 比较了治疗组之间的反应。

结果

参与者(n=761)的中位年龄为 62 岁;82%为白人,45%具有大学学历,35%无合并症。调查在诊断后中位数为 25 天(范围 9-100)进行。总体而言,55%的人偏好主动监测(AS),26%的人偏好手术,19%的人偏好放疗。参与者报告经常考虑手术、放疗和 AS。大多数人都知道自己的低危状况(97%)和 AS 的选择(96%)。然而,选择主动治疗(AT)的男性往往不知道治疗并发症,包括性功能障碍(23%)和尿失禁(41%)。大多数男性(63%)希望在考虑医生意见后自己做出决定,约 90%的人报告说他们充分参与了治疗讨论。选择 AS 的男性对自己的决定稍微感到不确定,比选择 AT 的男性略多。

结论

受试者积极参与决策,并考虑了一系列治疗方案。然而,我们发现选择 AT 的男性对治疗并发症的知识存在差距,而选择 AS 的男性对决策的不确定性略高,这表明需要早期决策支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ce/5849389/3931ec414825/nihms932430f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ce/5849389/3931ec414825/nihms932430f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ce/5849389/3931ec414825/nihms932430f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.低危前列腺癌男性的决策过程:一项调查研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):325-332. doi: 10.1002/pon.4469. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.低风险前列腺癌男性对主动监测与积极治疗的治疗偏好
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Aug;25(8):1240-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1079. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.癌症认知和医疗信息不一致与决策冲突相关:一项对接受主动监测的前列腺癌男性的初步研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10791.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
4
Does Patient Preference Measurement in Decision Aids Improve Decisional Conflict? A Randomized Trial in Men with Prostate Cancer.决策辅助工具中患者偏好测量是否能改善决策冲突?一项针对前列腺癌男性的随机试验。
Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):785-798. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0255-7.
5
How do patients choose between active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy? The effect of a preference-sensitive decision aid on treatment decision making for localized prostate cancer.患者如何在主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术和放射治疗之间做出选择?一种偏好敏感型决策辅助工具对局限性前列腺癌治疗决策的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(2):37.e9-37.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
How older patients' treatment preferences are influenced by disclosures about therapeutic uncertainty: surgery versus expectant management for localized prostate cancer.老年患者的治疗偏好如何受到关于治疗不确定性的披露的影响:局限性前列腺癌的手术治疗与观察等待管理
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Aug;44(8):934-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01863.x.
7
Satisfaction with Care Among Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Population-based Study.局部前列腺癌男性患者的护理满意度:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Prostatectomy versus radiotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer (PREPaRE) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study of treatment decision-making in men with localised prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌前列腺切除术与放疗(PREPaRE)研究:一项局部前列腺癌男性治疗决策混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e018403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018403.
9
Decipher test impacts decision making among patients considering adjuvant and salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy: Interim results from the Multicenter Prospective PRO-IMPACT study.Decipher检测对考虑根治性前列腺切除术后辅助治疗和挽救性治疗的患者的决策有影响:多中心前瞻性PRO-IMPACT研究的中期结果。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2850-2859. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30665. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?低风险局限性前列腺癌的主动监测:男性及其伴侣怎么看?
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):90-97. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw123. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
2
Men's experiences of decision-making in life-prolonging treatments of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - wishing for a process adapted to personal preferences: a prospective interview study.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌延长生命治疗中男性的决策经历——期望有一个适应个人偏好的过程:一项前瞻性访谈研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02985-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Physician Recommendations Trump Patient Preferences in Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions.在前列腺癌治疗决策中,医生的建议比患者的偏好更具影响力。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16662841. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
2
Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.低风险前列腺癌男性对主动监测与积极治疗的治疗偏好
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Aug;25(8):1240-50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1079. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
3
Informed Decision Making: Assessment of the Quality of Physician Communication about Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
Treatment decision-making and treatment experiences in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性患者的治疗决策与治疗经历
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 24;64:462-469. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42748.
4
The lived experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.前列腺癌主动监测的生活经历:系统评价与元综合分析
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01748-x.
5
Eliciting men's preferences for decision-making relative to treatments of localized prostate cancer with a good or moderate prognosis.了解男性在治疗预后良好或中等的局限性前列腺癌时对决策的偏好。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1541-1549. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04416-w. Epub 2023 May 12.
6
Psychological predictors of delayed active treatment following active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The Patient REported outcomes for Prostate cARE prospective cohort study.低风险前列腺癌主动监测后延迟积极治疗的心理预测因素:前列腺癌主动监测患者报告结局前瞻性队列研究
BJUI Compass. 2021 Dec 14;3(3):226-237. doi: 10.1002/bco2.124. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Patient participation in treatment decision-making of prostate cancer: a qualitative study.患者参与前列腺癌治疗决策:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4189-4200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06753-1. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Treatment decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer living in a remote area: A cross-sectional, observational study.居住在偏远地区的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的治疗决策:一项横断面观察性研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E160-E168. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6521.
9
Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?增强患者在放射肿瘤学决策中的能力——我们能做得更好吗?
Mol Oncol. 2020 Jul;14(7):1442-1460. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12675. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.评估局限性前列腺癌主动监测的风险。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1028-1039. doi: 10.1111/hex.12912. Epub 2019 May 16.
知情决策:对医生关于前列腺癌诊断与治疗沟通质量的评估
Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):999-1009. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15597226. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年局限性前列腺癌患者的管理趋势
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6036.
5
Systematic Review of Decision Aids for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Prostate Cancer Making Treatment Decisions.对新诊断前列腺癌患者进行治疗决策的决策辅助工具的系统评价。
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.093. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
6
Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta-analysis.局部前列腺癌治疗选择的决策辅助工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):239-51. doi: 10.3322/caac.21272. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析:决定局部前列腺癌主动监测中根治性治疗改变的因素。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):993-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
8
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.密歇根州低危前列腺癌男性中初始主动监测的当代应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
9
National trends in the management of low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in the United States.美国低危和中危前列腺癌管理的国家趋势。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.111. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
10
'What is this active surveillance thing?' Men's and partners' reactions to treatment decision making for prostate cancer when active surveillance is the recommended treatment option.“这种主动监测是怎么回事?”当主动监测为推荐治疗方案时,男性及其伴侣对前列腺癌治疗决策的反应
Psychooncology. 2014 Dec;23(12):1391-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3576. Epub 2014 May 16.