• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?低风险局限性前列腺癌的主动监测:男性及其伴侣怎么看?
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):90-97. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw123. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
2
'What is this active surveillance thing?' Men's and partners' reactions to treatment decision making for prostate cancer when active surveillance is the recommended treatment option.“这种主动监测是怎么回事?”当主动监测为推荐治疗方案时,男性及其伴侣对前列腺癌治疗决策的反应
Psychooncology. 2014 Dec;23(12):1391-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3576. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
'It's not like you just had a heart attack': decision-making about active surveillance by men with localized prostate cancer.“又不是你刚心脏病发作了”:局限性前列腺癌男性患者关于主动监测的决策
Psychooncology. 2014 Apr;23(4):467-72. doi: 10.1002/pon.3444. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
4
Designing Normative Messages About Active Surveillance for Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.为局限性前列腺癌男性设计关于主动监测的规范性信息。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(9):1014-20. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018618. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
Patient perspective on watchful waiting/active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.患者对局限性前列腺癌的观察等待/主动监测的看法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(6):763-70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.06.120128.
6
Is "Active Surveillance" an Acceptable Alternative?: A Qualitative Study of Couples' Decision Making about Early-Stage, Localized Prostate Cancer.“主动监测”是一种可接受的替代方案吗?一项关于夫妻对早期局限性前列腺癌决策的定性研究。
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2016;6(1):51-61. doi: 10.1353/nib.2016.0006.
7
Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.在对局限性前列腺癌进行主动监测的男性中,活检出现病理性进展的预测因素:监测活检模式的价值。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.060. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
Perception of cancer and inconsistency in medical information are associated with decisional conflict: a pilot study of men with prostate cancer who undergo active surveillance.癌症认知和医疗信息不一致与决策冲突相关:一项对接受主动监测的前列腺癌男性的初步研究。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10791.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
9
Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study.低危前列腺癌男性的决策过程:一项调查研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):325-332. doi: 10.1002/pon.4469. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Qualitative insights into how men with low-risk prostate cancer choosing active surveillance negotiate stress and uncertainty.关于低风险前列腺癌男性如何选择主动监测来应对压力和不确定性的定性见解。
BMC Urol. 2017 May 8;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0225-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Key Determinants Influencing Treatment Decision-Making for and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.影响前列腺癌积极监测治疗决策和依从性的关键决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jul 15;15(7):315. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070315.
2
The lived experience of active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.前列腺癌主动监测的生活经历:系统评价与元综合分析
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01748-x.
3
Patient perspectives on factors influencing active surveillance adherence for low-risk prostate cancer: A qualitative study.患者视角下影响低危前列腺癌主动监测依从性的因素:一项定性研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6847. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6847. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Five-year follow-up study of a population-based prospective cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: the treatment options in prostate cancer study (TOPCS): study protocol.基于人群的低危前列腺癌男性前瞻性队列的 5 年随访研究:前列腺癌治疗选择研究(TOPCS):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e056675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056675.
5
Supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer: A systematic review update.前列腺癌男性患者的支持性照护需求:系统评价更新。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Mar;31(2):e13541. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13541. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
6
Perceptions of partial gland ablation for prostate cancer among men on active surveillance: A qualitative study.接受主动监测的男性对前列腺癌部分腺体消融术的认知:一项定性研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2021 Jun;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000068.
7
Treatment decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer living in a remote area: A cross-sectional, observational study.居住在偏远地区的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的治疗决策:一项横断面观察性研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Mar;15(3):E160-E168. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6521.
8
Decision regret in men living with and beyond nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the United Kingdom: A population-based patient-reported outcome study.英国生存和生存后非转移性前列腺癌男性的决策后悔:基于人群的患者报告结局研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 May;29(5):886-893. doi: 10.1002/pon.5362. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study.为什么患有低危前列腺癌的男性选择并坚持接受主动监测:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0225134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225134. eCollection 2019.
10
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors' Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making.前列腺癌幸存者在治疗决策中的参与感的种族和民族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Dec;5(6):1273-1283. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0475-0. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
2
Patients' Survival Expectations With and Without Their Chosen Treatment for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌患者接受和不接受其选择的治疗时的生存预期。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):208-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1926.
3
Racial Differences in Treatment Decision-Making for Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Study.种族差异对临床局限性前列腺癌男性治疗决策的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Mar;3(1):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0109-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.1990 - 2013年局限性前列腺癌患者的管理趋势
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6036.
5
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.密歇根州低危前列腺癌男性中初始主动监测的当代应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
6
Perceptions of Active Surveillance and Treatment Recommendations for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: Results from a National Survey of Radiation Oncologists and Urologists.主动监测低危前列腺癌的认知和治疗推荐:一项全国范围内调查放射肿瘤学家和泌尿科医师的结果。
Med Care. 2014 Jul;52(7):579-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000155.
7
Variation in use of active surveillance among men undergoing expectant treatment for early stage prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌接受期待治疗的男性中主动监测使用的变化。
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.105. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
8
Quality of physician-patient relationships is associated with the influence of physician treatment recommendations among patients with prostate cancer who chose active surveillance.医患关系质量与选择主动监测的前列腺癌患者中医生治疗建议的影响力相关。
Urol Oncol. 2014 May;32(4):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
9
'It's not like you just had a heart attack': decision-making about active surveillance by men with localized prostate cancer.“又不是你刚心脏病发作了”:局限性前列腺癌男性患者关于主动监测的决策
Psychooncology. 2014 Apr;23(4):467-72. doi: 10.1002/pon.3444. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
10
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement.癌症中的过度诊断和过度治疗:改进的契机。
JAMA. 2013 Aug 28;310(8):797-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.108415.

低风险局限性前列腺癌的主动监测:男性及其伴侣怎么看?

Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?

作者信息

Mallapareddi Arun, Ruterbusch Julie, Reamer Elyse, Eggly Susan, Xu Jinping

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA and.

Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):90-97. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw123. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmw123
PMID:28034917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6916739/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance (AS) is recognized as a reasonable treatment option for low-risk localized prostate cancer (LPC) but continues to be chosen by a minority of men. To date, limited data are available regarding reasons why men with low-risk LPC adopt AS.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to better understand conceptualizations, experiences and reasons why men with low-risk LPC and their partners adopt AS.

METHODS

We conducted five focus groups (FGs), three among men with low-risk LPC who had chosen AS and two with their partners. FGs were video/audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 men and 6 partners (all women) participated in FG discussions. The most common reasons for choosing AS were seeing the LPC as 'small' or 'low grade' without need for immediate treatment and trusting their physician's AS recommendation. The most common concerns about AS were perceived unreliability of prostate specific antigen, pain associated with prostate biopsies and potential cancer progression. Partners saw themselves as very involved in their husbands' treatment decision-making process, more than men acknowledged them to be. Multiple terms including 'watchful waiting' were used interchangeably with AS. There appeared to be a lack of understanding that AS is not simply 'doing nothing' but is actually a recognized management option for low-risk LPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Emphasizing the low risk of a man's LPC and enhancing physician trust may increase acceptability of AS. Standardizing terminology and presenting AS as a reasonable and recognized management option may also help increase its adoption.

摘要

背景

主动监测(AS)被认为是低风险局限性前列腺癌(LPC)的一种合理治疗选择,但仍只有少数男性选择。迄今为止,关于低风险LPC男性采用AS的原因的数据有限。

目的

本研究的目的是更好地理解低风险LPC男性及其伴侣采用AS的概念、经历和原因。

方法

我们进行了五个焦点小组(FGs),其中三个是针对选择AS的低风险LPC男性,另外两个是与他们的伴侣一起进行的。焦点小组进行了视频/音频记录、转录,并使用定性主题分析进行分析。

结果

共有12名男性和6名伴侣(均为女性)参与了焦点小组讨论。选择AS的最常见原因是将LPC视为“小疾病”或“低级别疾病”,无需立即治疗,以及信任医生的AS建议。对AS最常见的担忧是前列腺特异性抗原的不可靠性、前列腺活检相关的疼痛以及潜在的癌症进展。伴侣们认为自己在丈夫的治疗决策过程中参与度很高,高于男性所认可的程度。包括“观察等待(watchful waiting)”在内的多个术语与AS可互换使用。似乎人们缺乏认识到AS并非简单地“什么都不做”,而是低风险LPC的一种公认的管理选择。

结论

强调男性LPC的低风险并增强医生的信任可能会提高AS的可接受性。规范术语并将AS呈现为一种合理且公认的管理选择也可能有助于增加其采用率。