• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association between Food for Life, a Whole Setting Healthy and Sustainable Food Programme, and Primary School Children's Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables: A Cross-Sectional Study in England.“生命食物”(一项全面的健康与可持续食品计划)与小学生水果和蔬菜摄入量之间的关联:英国的一项横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;14(6):639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060639.
2
Engagement with the National Healthy Schools Programme is associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption in primary school children.参与国家健康学校计划与小学生增加水果和蔬菜的消费有关。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Apr;25(2):155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01208.x. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
3
The impact of the food-based and nutrient-based standards on lunchtime food and drink provision and consumption in primary schools in England.基于食物和营养素标准对英格兰小学午餐时间提供的食物和饮料以及其消费的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Feb;14(2):209-18. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002132. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
4
School meals: types of foods offered to and consumed by children at lunch and breakfast.学校膳食:儿童在午餐和早餐时所提供和食用的食物类型。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2 Suppl):S67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.062.
5
Children's lunchtime food choices following the introduction of food-based standards for school meals: observations from six primary schools in Sheffield.儿童在学校午餐引入基于食物标准后的食物选择:谢菲尔德六所小学的观察结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Feb;14(2):271-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002120. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
6
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program and Requests for Fruits and Vegetables Outside School Settings.新鲜水果和蔬菜计划及校外设置的水果和蔬菜需求。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Aug;118(8):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.013. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
7
What determines the fruit and vegetables intake of primary school children? - An analysis of personal and social determinants.哪些因素决定了小学生的果蔬摄入量?——个人和社会决定因素的分析。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Increasing Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: Findings from the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.增加儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量:美国农业部新鲜水果和蔬菜项目的研究结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Aug;115(8):1283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
9
Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Fruits and Vegetables Selected and Consumed at School Lunch among Second- and Third-Grade Students.验证一种用于测量二、三年级学生在学校午餐中选择和食用的水果和蔬菜的问卷。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1700-1710.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
Increasing children's fruit and vegetable consumption: distribution or a multicomponent programme?增加儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量:分发还是多组分计划?
Public Health Nutr. 2007 Sep;10(9):939-47. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007665495. Epub 2007 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary-school-aged children inspire their peers and families to eat more vegetables in the KiiDSAY project: a qualitative descriptive study.KiiDSAY 项目:小学生激励同伴和家人多吃蔬菜:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Mar 9;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04643-z.
2
Impact and process evaluation of a primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.澳大利亚一项针对 10-12 岁儿童的小学食物教育和可持续性培训(FEAST)计划的影响和过程评估:实用群组非随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18079-8.
3
A Systematic Review of Healthy Nutrition Intervention Programs in Kindergarten and Primary Education.幼儿园和小学健康营养干预计划的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 20;15(3):541. doi: 10.3390/nu15030541.
4
Evaluating OzHarvest's primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.评估澳大利亚 10-12 岁儿童的 OzHarvest 小学食品教育和可持续性培训(FEAST)计划:一项实用的群组非随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10302-0.
5
Dissemination of EAACI food allergy guidelines using a flexible, practical, whole school allergy awareness toolkit.使用灵活实用的全校过敏意识工具包推广 EAACI 食物过敏指南。
Allergy. 2021 Nov;76(11):3479-3488. doi: 10.1111/all.14871. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Promoting Healthy Eating among Young People-A Review of the Evidence of the Impact of School-Based Interventions.促进年轻人健康饮食——学校干预措施影响的证据综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Sep 22;12(9):2894. doi: 10.3390/nu12092894.
7
Dietary Behaviours Among Han, Tujia and Miao Primary School Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Chongqing, China.汉族、土家族和苗族小学生的饮食行为:中国重庆的一项横断面调查
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Aug 24;13:1309-1318. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S249101. eCollection 2020.
8
Health and Sustainability in Public Meals-An Explorative Review.公共餐饮中的健康与可持续性——探索性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 18;17(2):621. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020621.

本文引用的文献

1
Are school meals a viable and sustainable tool to improve the healthiness and sustainability of children´s diet and food consumption? A cross-national comparative perspective.学校膳食是否是改善儿童饮食健康和可持续性的可行和可持续工具?跨国比较视角。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Dec 12;57(18):3942-3958. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1197180.
2
The World Health Organization's Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.世界卫生组织促进健康学校框架:一项Cochrane系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y.
3
The PRO GREENS intervention in Finnish schoolchildren - the degree of implementation affects both mediators and the intake of fruits and vegetables.针对芬兰学童的“超级绿色食品”干预措施——实施程度既影响调节因素,也影响水果和蔬菜的摄入量。
Br J Nutr. 2014 Oct 14;112(7):1185-94. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001767. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Vital signs: fruit and vegetable intake among children - United States, 2003-2010.生命体征:儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量 - 美国,2003-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Aug 8;63(31):671-6.
5
Fruit and vegetable consumption in a sample of 11-year-old children in ten European countries--the PRO GREENS cross-sectional survey.十个欧洲国家11岁儿童样本中的水果和蔬菜摄入量——PRO GREENS横断面调查
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Nov;17(11):2436-44. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001347. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial.旨在增加儿童身体活动、减少久坐行为和增加水果与蔬菜摄入量的干预措施对儿童的影响:积极生活 5 年(AFLY5)基于学校的群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3256.
7
The association between organic school food policy and school food environment: results from an observational study in Danish schools.有机学校食品政策与学校食品环境的关联:来自丹麦学校的观察性研究结果。
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Mar;134(2):110-6. doi: 10.1177/1757913913517976. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Do attitudes, intentions and actions of school food coordinators regarding public organic food procurement policy improve the eating environment at school? Results from the iPOPY study.学校食品协调员对公共有机食品采购政策的态度、意愿和行为是否会改善学校的饮食环境?iPOPY 研究的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jun;17(6):1299-307. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001511. Epub 2013 May 31.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y.系统评价和荟萃分析:以学校为基础的干预措施对改善 5 至 12 岁儿童每日水果和蔬菜摄入量的效果
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):889-901. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030270. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Food sustainability education as a route to healthier eating: evaluation of a multi-component school programme in English primary schools.食物可持续性教育作为更健康饮食的途径:英国小学多组分学校方案的评估。
Health Educ Res. 2012 Jun;27(3):448-58. doi: 10.1093/her/cys016. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

“生命食物”(一项全面的健康与可持续食品计划)与小学生水果和蔬菜摄入量之间的关联:英国的一项横断面研究

Association between Food for Life, a Whole Setting Healthy and Sustainable Food Programme, and Primary School Children's Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables: A Cross-Sectional Study in England.

作者信息

Jones Mat, Pitt Hannah, Oxford Liz, Bray Issy, Kimberlee Richard, Orme Judy

机构信息

Public Health and Wellbeing Research Group, University of the West of England (UWE), Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.

Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3BA, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;14(6):639. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060639.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14060639
PMID:28613266
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5486325/
Abstract

The promotion of dietary health is a public health priority in England and in other countries. Research shows that the majority of children do not consume the recommended amount of fruit and vegetables (F&V). There has been relatively little research on the impact of programmes, such as Food for Life, that (a) integrate action on nutrition and food sustainability issues, and (b) are delivered as commissions in a local authority area. The study sought to assess pupil F&V in schools engaged with the Food for Life (FFL) programme. The design was a cross-sectional study comparing pupils in FFL engaged (n = 24) and non-engaged (n = 23) schools. A total of 2411 pupils aged 8-10 completed a validated self-report questionnaire. After adjusting for confounders, pupils in schools engaged with FFL consumed significantly more servings of F&V compared to pupils in comparison schools (M = 2.03/1.54, < 0.001). Pupils in FFL schools were twice as likely to eat five or more portions of F&V per day (Odds Ratio = 2.07, < 0.001, Confidence Interval = 1.54, 2.77). Total F&V consumption was significantly higher ( < 0.05) amongst pupils in schools with a higher level FFL award. Whilst limitations include possible residual confounding, the study suggests primary school engagement with the FFL programme may be an effective way of improving children's dietary health.

摘要

促进饮食健康是英国及其他国家公共卫生的重点工作。研究表明,大多数儿童并未摄入推荐量的水果和蔬菜(F&V)。对于诸如“生命之粮”这类(a)将营养与食品可持续性问题的行动整合在一起,且(b)作为地方当局辖区内委托项目开展的项目所产生的影响,相关研究相对较少。该研究旨在评估参与“生命之粮”(FFL)项目的学校中学生的水果和蔬菜摄入量。研究设计为横断面研究,比较参与FFL项目的学校(n = 24)和未参与该项目的学校(n = 23)的学生情况。共有2411名8至10岁的学生完成了一份经过验证的自我报告问卷。在对混杂因素进行调整后,与对照学校的学生相比,参与FFL项目学校的学生摄入的水果和蔬菜份数显著更多(M = 2.03/1.54,P < 0.001)。FFL学校的学生每天食用五份或更多份水果和蔬菜(F&V)的可能性是对照学校学生的两倍(优势比 = 2.07,P < 0.001,置信区间 = 1.54, 2.77)。在获得较高等级FFL奖项的学校中,学生的水果和蔬菜总摄入量显著更高(P < 0.05)。尽管存在可能的残余混杂等局限性,但该研究表明小学参与FFL项目可能是改善儿童饮食健康的有效途径。