Suppr超能文献

极低帧率数字荧光透视在心房颤动导管消融中的应用:2帧/秒与4帧/秒帧率的比较

Extremely low-frame-rate digital fluoroscopy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A comparison of 2 versus 4 frame rate.

作者信息

Lee Ji Hyun, Kim Jun, Kim Minsu, Hwang Jongmin, Hwang You Mi, Kang Joon-Won, Nam Gi-Byoung, Choi Kee-Joon, Kim You-Ho

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7200. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007200.

Abstract

Despite the technological advance in 3-dimensional (3D) mapping, radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a major concern in both patients and physicians. Previous studies reported substantial radiation exposure (7369-8690 cGy cm) during AF catheter ablation with fluoroscopic settings of 7.5 frames per second (FPS) under 3D mapping system guidance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-frame-rate fluoroscopy protocol for catheter ablation for AF.Retrospective analysis of data on 133 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation with 3-D electro-anatomic mapping at our institute from January 2014 to May 2015 was performed. Since January 2014, fluoroscopy frame rate of 4-FPS was implemented at our institute, which was further decreased to 2-FPS in September 2014. We compared the radiation exposure quantified as dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (ED) between the 4-FPS (n = 57) and 2-FPS (n = 76) groups.The 4-FPS group showed higher median DAP (599.9 cGy cm; interquartile range [IR], 371.4-1337.5 cGy cm vs. 392.0 cGy cm; IR, 289.7-591.4 cGy cm; P < .01), longer median fluoroscopic time (24.4 min; IR, 17.5-34.9 min vs. 15.1 min; IR, 10.7-20.1 min; P < .01), and higher median ED (1.1 mSv; IR, 0.7-2.5 mSv vs. 0.7 mSv; IR, 0.6-1.1 mSv; P < .01) compared with the 2-FPS group. No major procedure-related complications such as cardiac tamponade were observed in either group. Over follow-up durations of 331 ± 197 days, atrial tachyarrhythmia recurred in 20 patients (35.1%) in the 4-FPS group and in 27 patients (35.5%) in the 2-FPS group (P = .96). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant different between the 2 groups (log rank, P = .25).In conclusion, both the 4-FPS and 2-FPS settings were feasible and emitted a relatively low level of radiation compared with that historically reported for DAP in a conventional fluoroscopy setting.

摘要

尽管三维(3D)标测技术有所进步,但心房颤动(AF)导管消融术中的辐射暴露仍是患者和医生共同关注的主要问题。既往研究报道,在3D标测系统引导下,房颤导管消融术在每秒7.5帧(FPS)的透视设置下会产生大量辐射暴露(7369 - 8690 cGy cm)。我们评估了低帧率透视方案用于房颤导管消融的有效性和安全性。

对2014年1月至2015年5月在我院接受3D电解剖标测房颤导管消融术的133例患者的数据进行回顾性分析。自2014年1月起,我院将透视帧率设定为4 - FPS,2014年9月进一步降至2 - FPS。我们比较了4 - FPS组(n = 57)和2 - FPS组(n = 76)之间以剂量面积乘积(DAP)和有效剂量(ED)量化的辐射暴露情况。

与2 - FPS组相比,4 - FPS组的DAP中位数更高(599.9 cGy cm;四分位数间距[IR],371.4 - 1337.5 cGy cm vs. 392.0 cGy cm;IR,289.7 - 591.4 cGy cm;P <.01),透视时间中位数更长(24.4 分钟;IR,17.5 - 34.9分钟 vs. 15.1分钟;IR,10.7 - 20.1分钟;P <.01),ED中位数更高(1.1 mSv;IR,0.7 - 2.5 mSv vs. 0.7 mSv;IR,0.6 - 1.1 mSv;P <.01)。两组均未观察到诸如心脏压塞等与手术相关的严重并发症。在331 ± 197天的随访期间,4 - FPS组有20例患者(35.1%)复发房性快速性心律失常,2 - FPS组有27例患者(35.5%)复发(P =.96)。Kaplan - Meier生存分析显示两组之间无显著差异(对数秩,P =.25)。

总之,与传统透视设置下历史报道的DAP相比,4 - FPS和2 - FPS设置都是可行的,且辐射水平相对较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3937/5478349/3b40935315ab/medi-96-e7200-g005.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验