Blasberg Tobias F, Wolf Lea, Henke Christian, Lorenz Matthias W
Department of Neurology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Helios HSK Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Straße 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany.
BMC Neurol. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0894-2.
Isolated transient vertigo can be the only symptom of posterior circulation ischemia. Thus, it is important to differentiate isolated vertigo of a cerebrovascular origin from that of more benign origins, as patients with cerebral ischemia have a much higher risk for future stroke than do those with 'peripheral' vertigo. The current study aims to identify risk factors for cerebrovascular origin of isolated transient vertigo, and for future cerebrovascular events.
From the files of 339 outpatients with isolated transient vertigo we extracted history, clinical and technical findings, diagnosis, and follow-up information on subsequent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Risk factors were analyzed using multivariate regression models (logistic or Cox) and reconfirmed in univariate analyses.
On first presentation, 48 (14.2%) patients received the diagnosis 'probable or definite cerebrovascular vertigo'. During follow-up, 41 patients suffered stroke or TIA (event rate 7.9 per 100 person years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-10.4), 26 in the posterior circulation (event rate 4.8 per 100 person years, 95% CI 3.0-6.7). The diagnosis was not associated with follow-up cerebrovascular events. In multivariate models testing multiple potential determinants, only the presentation mode was consistently associated with the diagnosis and stroke risk: patients who presented because of vertigo (rather than reporting vertigo when they presented for other reasons) had a significantly higher risk for future stroke or TIA (p = 0.028, event rate 13.4 vs. 5.4 per 100 person years) and for future posterior circulation stroke or TIA (p = 0.044, event rate 7.8 vs. 3.5 per 100 person years).
We here report for the first time follow-up stroke rates in patients with transient isolated vertigo. In such patients, the identification of those with cerebrovascular origin remains difficult, and presentation mode was found to be the only consistent risk factor. Confirmation in an independent prospective sample is needed.
孤立性短暂性眩晕可能是后循环缺血的唯一症状。因此,区分脑血管源性孤立性眩晕与其他良性病因的眩晕很重要,因为脑缺血患者未来发生中风的风险比“外周性”眩晕患者高得多。本研究旨在确定孤立性短暂性眩晕的脑血管源性及未来脑血管事件的危险因素。
从339例孤立性短暂性眩晕门诊患者的病历中提取病史、临床和技术检查结果、诊断以及后续中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的随访信息。使用多变量回归模型(逻辑回归或Cox回归)分析危险因素,并在单变量分析中再次确认。
首次就诊时,48例(14.2%)患者被诊断为“可能或肯定的脑血管性眩晕”。随访期间,41例患者发生中风或TIA(事件发生率为每100人年7.9例,95%置信区间(CI)5.5 - 10.4),26例发生在后循环(事件发生率为每100人年4.8例,95%CI 3.0 - 6.7)。该诊断与随访期间的脑血管事件无关。在测试多个潜在决定因素的多变量模型中,只有就诊方式与诊断和中风风险始终相关:因眩晕就诊的患者(而非因其他原因就诊时报告眩晕的患者)未来发生中风或TIA的风险显著更高(p = 0.028,事件发生率为每100人年13.4例对5.4例),以及未来发生后循环中风或TIA的风险也显著更高(p = 0.044,事件发生率为每100人年7.8例对3.5例)。
我们首次报告了短暂性孤立性眩晕患者的随访中风发生率。在此类患者中,确定脑血管源性患者仍然困难,且发现就诊方式是唯一一致的危险因素。需要在独立的前瞻性样本中进行验证。