Newman-Toker David E, Hsieh Yu-Hsiang, Camargo Carlos A, Pelletier Andrea J, Butchy Gregary T, Edlow Jonathan A
Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Jul;83(7):765-75. doi: 10.4065/83.7.765.
To describe the spectrum of visits to US emergency departments (EDs) for acute dizziness and determine whether ED patients with dizziness are diagnosed as having a range of benign and dangerous medical disorders, rather than predominantly vestibular ones.
A cross-sectional study of ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) used a weighted sample of US ED visits (1993-2005) to measure patient and hospital demographics, ED diagnoses, and resource use in cases vs controls without dizziness. Dizziness in patients 16 years or older was defined as an NHAMCS reason-for-visit code of dizziness/vertigo (1225.0) or a final International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis of dizziness/vertigo (780.4) or of a vestibular disorder (386.x).
A total of 9472 dizziness cases (3.3% of visits) were sampled over 13 years (weighted 33.6 million). Top diagnostic groups were otologic/vestibular (32.9%), cardiovascular (21.1%), respiratory (11.5%), neurologic (11.2%, including 4% cerebrovascular), metabolic (11.0%), injury/poisoning (10.6%), psychiatric (7.2%), digestive (7.0%), genitourinary (5.1%), and infectious (2.9%). Nearly half of the cases (49.2%) were given a medical diagnosis, and 22.1% were given only a symptom diagnosis. Predefined dangerous disorders were diagnosed in 15%, especially among those older than 50 years (20.9% vs 9.3%; P<.001). Dizziness cases were evaluated longer (mean 4.0 vs 3.4 hours), imaged disproportionately (18.0% vs 6.9% undergoing computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), and admitted more often (18.8% vs 14.8%) (all P<.001).
Dizziness is not attributed to a vestibular disorder in most ED cases and often is associated with cardiovascular or other medical causes, including dangerous ones. Resource use is substantial, yet many patients remain undiagnosed.
描述美国急诊科急性头晕就诊情况的范围,并确定急诊科头晕患者是否被诊断患有一系列良性和危险的医学病症,而非主要是前庭病症。
一项基于国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)的急诊科就诊情况横断面研究,采用美国急诊科就诊情况的加权样本(1993 - 2005年)来衡量患者和医院的人口统计学特征、急诊科诊断以及有头晕与无头晕对照病例的资源使用情况。16岁及以上患者的头晕定义为NHAMCS就诊原因代码中的头晕/眩晕(1225.0)或最终国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本中头晕/眩晕(780.4)或前庭疾病(386.x)的诊断。
在13年期间共抽取了9472例头晕病例(占就诊病例的3.3%)(加权后为3360万例)。主要诊断类别包括耳科/前庭疾病(32.9%)、心血管疾病(21.1%)、呼吸系统疾病(11.5%)、神经系统疾病(11.2%,包括4%的脑血管疾病)、代谢性疾病(11.0%)、损伤/中毒(10.6%)、精神疾病(7.2%)、消化系统疾病(7.0%)、泌尿生殖系统疾病(5.1%)和感染性疾病(2.9%)。近一半的病例(49.2%)得到了医学诊断,22.1%仅得到了症状诊断。15%的病例被诊断为预定义的危险病症,尤其是50岁以上人群(20.9%对9.3%;P<0.001)。头晕病例的评估时间更长(平均4.0小时对3.4小时),接受影像学检查的比例过高(18.0%对6.9%接受计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像),住院率也更高(18.8%对14.8%)(所有P<0.001)。
在大多数急诊科病例中,头晕并非归因于前庭疾病,且常与心血管或其他医学病因相关,包括危险病因。资源使用量大,但许多患者仍未得到诊断。