• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值的保险设计对物理治疗腰痛的护理利用和成本的影响。

Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost.

作者信息

Maeng Daniel D, Graboski Anthony, Allison Peiling L, Fisher Dorothy Y, Bulger John B

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger Health System.

Geisinger Health Plan, Danville, PA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2017 May 31;10:1337-1346. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S135813. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S135813
PMID:28615965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5459966/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a value-based insurance design providing enhanced access to physical therapy (PT) for treatment of back pain on treatment patterns and cost of care.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of claims data obtained from Geisinger Health Plan (GHP). In April 2013, GHP began offering "PT bundle" - i.e., a bundle of up to five PT visits for a single one-time copay that can be renewed for another bundle of five PT visits - for its employer-based plan members with back pain.

METHODS

A cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for the PT bundle were compared against a contemporaneous cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for PT under the standard per-visit copay arrangement between January 2013 and October 2014.

RESULTS

Among the PT bundle cohort, the PT visit rate during the first 9 months since the PT preauthorization date had dramatically increased and then gradually decreased in subsequent months. The PT bundle was also associated with 29%-35% short-term reductions in emergency department visits and with 12%-20% reductions in primary care visits after 6 months. No significant impact on hospitalization or cost was observed.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the PT bundle appears to have led to a change in the treatment pattern of back pain that is more consistent with the recommended guidelines to use more conservative management such as PT as the first-line treatment for back pain.

摘要

目的

评估基于价值的保险设计对背痛治疗模式和护理成本的影响,该设计为物理治疗(PT)提供了更多机会。

研究设计

对从盖辛格健康计划(GHP)获得的理赔数据进行回顾性分析。2013年4月,GHP开始为患有背痛的雇主计划成员提供“PT套餐”,即一次性共付费用可享受多达五次PT就诊,可再续订另一组五次PT就诊。

方法

将一组预先批准使用PT套餐的GHP成员与2013年1月至2014年10月期间根据标准每次就诊共付安排预先批准进行PT治疗的同期GHP成员队列进行比较。

结果

在PT套餐队列中,自PT预先批准日期起的前9个月内,PT就诊率大幅上升,随后几个月逐渐下降。PT套餐还与急诊就诊短期减少29%-35%以及6个月后初级保健就诊减少12%-20%相关。未观察到对住院或成本有显著影响。

结论

PT套餐的实施似乎导致了背痛治疗模式的改变,这种改变更符合推荐的指南,即使用更保守的管理方法,如将PT作为背痛的一线治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecae/5459966/51bd364efa42/jpr-10-1337Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecae/5459966/51bd364efa42/jpr-10-1337Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecae/5459966/51bd364efa42/jpr-10-1337Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost.基于价值的保险设计对物理治疗腰痛的护理利用和成本的影响。
J Pain Res. 2017 May 31;10:1337-1346. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S135813. eCollection 2017.
2
Impact of a value-based insurance design for back pain on health plan member satisfaction and its implications for patient outcomes.基于价值的背痛保险设计对健康计划成员满意度的影响及其对患者结局的意义。
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Jun;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2014.0054. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
3
Subsequent health-care utilization associated with early physical therapy for new episodes of low back pain in older adults.老年人新发腰痛早期进行物理治疗与后续医疗保健利用的关系。
Spine J. 2017 Mar;17(3):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Physical Therapy as the First Point of Care to Treat Low Back Pain: An Instrumental Variables Approach to Estimate Impact on Opioid Prescription, Health Care Utilization, and Costs.物理治疗作为治疗腰痛的首要护理手段:一种用于估计对阿片类药物处方、医疗保健利用及成本影响的工具变量法
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4629-4646. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12984. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
Patterns of health care utilization and cost before and after opioid overdose: findings from 10-year longitudinal health plan claims data.阿片类药物过量前后的医疗保健利用模式和成本:来自10年纵向健康计划索赔数据的发现
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2017 Aug 16;8:57-67. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S135884. eCollection 2017.
6
Relationship of Opioid Prescriptions to Physical Therapy Referral and Participation for Medicaid Patients with New-Onset Low Back Pain.阿片类药物处方与医疗补助计划中新发腰痛患者的物理治疗转诊及参与情况的关系
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):784-794. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170064.
7
Impact of a multidisciplinary pain management program on patient care utilization and cost of care.多学科疼痛管理项目对患者护理利用和护理成本的影响。
J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 18;11:2375-2383. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S177231. eCollection 2018.
8
A comparison of analgesic prescribing among ED back and neck pain visits receiving physical therapy versus usual care.比较接受物理治疗与常规护理的急诊科腰背和颈部疼痛就诊患者的镇痛药物处方。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1322-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain.使用 STarT 后背筛查工具预测接受物理治疗的腰痛患者的功能障碍结局。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Elimination of the Out-of-Pocket Charge for Children's Primary Care Visits: An Application of Value-Based Insurance Design.取消儿童初级保健就诊的自付费用:基于价值的保险设计的应用。
J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;175:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Management Pathway and Opioid Prescriptions for Patients Entering the Emergency Department With Neck and Back Pain.急诊科收治的颈肩痛和背痛患者的管理途径与阿片类药物处方之间的关联
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Oct 9;7(5):490-498. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.001. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Strategies to Increase Access to Outpatient Physiotherapy Services: A Scoping Review.增加门诊物理治疗服务可及性的策略:一项范围综述
Physiother Can. 2022 Mar 17;74(2):197-207. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0119. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Development of a Logic Model for a Programme to Reduce the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rate for Non-Specific Lower Back Pain in a Tertiary Care Centre.

本文引用的文献

1
Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians.非侵入性治疗急性、亚急性和慢性下背痛:美国医师学院临床实践指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
2
A value proposition for early physical therapist management of neck pain: a retrospective cohort analysis.颈部疼痛早期物理治疗师管理的价值主张:一项回顾性队列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 12;16:253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1504-5.
3
Impact of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure on Physical Therapy Utilization for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Data.
为一家三级护理中心制定的降低非特异性下腰痛磁共振成像率项目的逻辑模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;9(2):238. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020238.
4
Feasibility study and process evaluation of MRI plus physiotherapy vs. physiotherapy alone in non-specific chronic low back pain among patients in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯患者中,磁共振成像(MRI)联合物理治疗与单纯物理治疗用于非特异性慢性下腰痛的可行性研究及过程评估
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 30;6(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00731-w.
5
Enhancing Access to Physical Therapy Services for People Experiencing Poverty and Homelessness: The Lighthouse Pilot Project.改善贫困和无家可归者获得物理治疗服务的机会:灯塔试点项目。
Physiother Can. 2019 Spring;71(2):176-186. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-85.pc.
6
Self-reported use of family physician, chiropractor and physiotherapy services among adult Canadians with chronic back disorders: an observational study.成年慢性背痛加拿大患者自我报告的家庭医生、脊椎按摩治疗师和物理治疗服务使用情况:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3790-6.
7
Looking ahead: chronic spinal pain management.展望未来:慢性脊柱疼痛管理
J Pain Res. 2017 Aug 30;10:2089-2095. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S136589. eCollection 2017.
自付费用对非特异性下腰痛物理治疗利用的影响:医疗支出面板调查数据的二次分析
Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;96(2):212-21. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150028. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Patterns of health care utilization for low back pain.腰痛的医疗保健利用模式。
J Pain Res. 2015 Aug 12;8:523-35. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S83599. eCollection 2015.
5
Use of electronic health records for early detection of high-cost, low back pain patients.利用电子健康记录早期发现高成本的腰痛患者。
Pain Res Manag. 2015 Sep-Oct;20(5):234-40. doi: 10.1155/2015/862702. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs.早期且遵循指南的物理治疗对腰痛患者的医疗资源利用及费用的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 9;15:150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3.
7
Physical Therapy or Advanced Imaging as First Management Strategy Following a New Consultation for Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Associations with Future Health Care Utilization and Charges.在初级保健中针对新发腰痛进行初次会诊后,将物理治疗或高级影像学检查作为首要管理策略:与未来医疗保健利用和费用的关联
Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec;50(6):1927-40. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12301. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Impact of a value-based insurance design for back pain on health plan member satisfaction and its implications for patient outcomes.基于价值的背痛保险设计对健康计划成员满意度的影响及其对患者结局的意义。
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Jun;18(3):203-8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2014.0054. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.背痛管理和治疗的恶化趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 23;173(17):1573-81. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8992.
10
Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: impact on future health care utilization and costs.初级保健转介腰痛患者至物理治疗:对未来医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 1;37(25):2114-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825d32f5.